Bug#305325: checkstyle: Antlr dependency should be == 2.7.2
Hello, Is this problem still reproducable? I think it was fixed by some earlier antlr or ant upload as I cant reproduce it. Cheers, Michael -- Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath! http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html Join the community at http://planet.classpath.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#305325: checkstyle: Antlr dependency should be == 2.7.2
Package: checkstyle Version: 3.4-8 Severity: important Checkstyle apparently cannot run properly with Antlr 2.7.5 (latest in Debian Sid). I haven't tested intermediate versions but Checkstyle's documentation (and my experimentation) shows that it runs as required with Antlr 2.7.2 I'm not sure how this should be properly resolved, but thought it should be brought to someone's attention. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages checkstyle depends on: ii antlr 2.7.5-6language tool for constructing rec ii junit 3.8.1.1-4 Automated testing framework for Ja ii libcommons-beanutils-java 1.6.1-4utility for manipulating JavaBeans ii libcommons-cli-java 1.0-6 API for working with the command l ii libcommons-collections-ja 2.1.1-3A set of abstract data type interf ii libcommons-logging-java 1.0.4-2The commmon wrapper interface for ii libregexp-java1.3-1 regular expression library for Jav ii sun-j2sdk1.5 [java2-runti 1.5.0+update01 Java(TM) 2 SDK, Standard Edition, -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#305325: checkstyle: Antlr dependency should be == 2.7.2
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 07:30:47PM +1000, David Blaikie wrote: Package: checkstyle Version: 3.4-8 Severity: important Checkstyle apparently cannot run properly with Antlr 2.7.5 (latest in Debian Sid). I haven't tested intermediate versions but Checkstyle's documentation (and my experimentation) shows that it runs as required with Antlr 2.7.2 I'm not sure how this should be properly resolved, but thought it should be brought to someone's attention. And what are the problems? What doesn't work? Do you have a simple testcase for this? I use checkstyle locally without any problems. Michael -- Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath! http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html Join the community at http://planet.classpath.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#305325: checkstyle: Antlr dependency should be == 2.7.2
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 11:57:56AM +0200, Michael Koch wrote: On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 07:30:47PM +1000, David Blaikie wrote: Package: checkstyle Version: 3.4-8 Severity: important Checkstyle apparently cannot run properly with Antlr 2.7.5 (latest in Debian Sid). I haven't tested intermediate versions but Checkstyle's documentation (and my experimentation) shows that it runs as required with Antlr 2.7.2 And what are the problems? What doesn't work? Do you have a simple testcase for this? I use checkstyle locally without any problems. Sorry, I just reread that bug report and realised how useless/erroneous it was. Seems the specific issue I was having is that the Checkstyle Ant task fails (if you are interested I can provide comparative output, but I haven't produced a trivial test case) when antlr.jar is in (or linked from) /usr/share/ant/lib (as is the case with the Debian antlr package). Not sure if this is an irreconcileable conflict, but in any case I'm not sure it's a bug I can really file against any specific package. This can be closed, sorry for the inconvenience. David -- -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.1 GCS d+@ s++: a-- C ULS++ P L++ !E W++ N+ o? K? w(+) O? M@ V? PS+ PE@ Y+ PGP- t(+) 5 X+ R? tv+ b+ DI++ D++ G+ e h! r !y --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#305325: checkstyle: Antlr dependency should be == 2.7.2
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 01:37:44PM +1000, David Blaikie wrote: On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 11:57:56AM +0200, Michael Koch wrote: On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 07:30:47PM +1000, David Blaikie wrote: Package: checkstyle Version: 3.4-8 Severity: important Checkstyle apparently cannot run properly with Antlr 2.7.5 (latest in Debian Sid). I haven't tested intermediate versions but Checkstyle's documentation (and my experimentation) shows that it runs as required with Antlr 2.7.2 And what are the problems? What doesn't work? Do you have a simple testcase for this? I use checkstyle locally without any problems. Sorry, I just reread that bug report and realised how useless/erroneous it was. Seems the specific issue I was having is that the Checkstyle Ant task fails (if you are interested I can provide comparative output, but I haven't produced a trivial test case) when antlr.jar is in (or linked from) /usr/share/ant/lib (as is the case with the Debian antlr package). Not sure if this is an irreconcileable conflict, but in any case I'm not sure it's a bug I can really file against any specific package. This can be closed, sorry for the inconvenience. Please attach the output you have to this bug and I will se what I can do. Michael -- Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath! http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html Join the community at http://planet.classpath.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#305325: checkstyle: Antlr dependency should be == 2.7.2
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 05:35:13AM +0200, Michael Koch wrote: On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 01:37:44PM +1000, David Blaikie wrote: On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 11:57:56AM +0200, Michael Koch wrote: On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 07:30:47PM +1000, David Blaikie wrote: Package: checkstyle Version: 3.4-8 Severity: important Checkstyle apparently cannot run properly with Antlr 2.7.5 (latest in Debian Sid). I haven't tested intermediate versions but Checkstyle's documentation (and my experimentation) shows that it runs as required with Antlr 2.7.2 And what are the problems? What doesn't work? Do you have a simple testcase for this? I use checkstyle locally without any problems. Sorry, I just reread that bug report and realised how useless/erroneous it was. Seems the specific issue I was having is that the Checkstyle Ant task fails (if you are interested I can provide comparative output, but I haven't produced a trivial test case) when antlr.jar is in (or linked from) /usr/share/ant/lib (as is the case with the Debian antlr package). Not sure if this is an irreconcileable conflict, but in any case I'm not sure it's a bug I can really file against any specific package. This can be closed, sorry for the inconvenience. Please attach the output you have to this bug and I will se what I can do. It seems there's a fundamental conflict between the ANTLR Ant Task (or more generally, having antlr.jar in the global CLASSPATH or Ant's lib directory - even if you aren't actively using the ANTLR Task) and the Checkstyle Ant Task. There's a passing comment about it in an Ant development proposal here: http://fisheye.cenqua.com/viewrep/~raw,r=1.3/ant/proposal/mutant/docs/desc.html Basically if I have Ant with antlr.jar in ant/lib (as is the state when the antlr and ant debian packages are installed) and I use the checkstyle task, including in its classpath all the checkstyle jars (including or excluding antlr.jar, it doesn't matter) then checkstyle will fail to run properly, producing errors such as this: [checkstyle] Can't find/access AST Node typecom.puppycrawl.tools.checkstyle.api.DetailAST (repeated several times) [checkstyle] /home/dblaikie/work/honours/ssaburg/src/au/edu/usyd/it/ssaburg/Expression.java:0: Got an exception - java.lang.ClassCastException: antlr.CommonAST (things like this for every source file) due to the way Ant sets up the ClassLoader hierarchy, the Antlr classes are loaded by the base loader which is above the loader used for the checkstyle classes, therefore the Antlr classes cannot access the checkstyle classes (but checkstyle can access antlr classes). Even including the antlr.jar in the local classpath used to load the checkstyle task is insufficient as Java's ClassLoader delegation model still causes the base antlr.jar to be used. And this is all quite a pity, but I don't think there's much to be done about it. I think I'll just manually execute Checkstyle 4.0 (has a few more features that are nice, and can handle generics, more or less) every now and then.. Thanks, David -- -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.1 GCS d+@ s++: a-- C ULS++ P L++ !E W++ N+ o? K? w(+) O? M@ V? PS+ PE@ Y+ PGP- t(+) 5 X+ R? tv+ b+ DI++ D++ G+ e h! r !y --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
