Bug#307188: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#307188: octave-gpc: FTBFS: no match for 'operator[]' in '*m[vertices]'
* Christian T. Steigies [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-05-04 11:14]: gpcl_2.32-1_m68k.changes ACCEPTED Thanks! Do I need to build something else? Regarding gpcl and octave-gpc, no. -- Rafael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307188: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#307188: octave-gpc: FTBFS: no match for 'operator[]' in '*m[vertices]'
[Cc: to debian-release] * Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-05-01 15:16]: Package: octave-gpc Version: 0.1.4-1 Severity: serious Tags: sarge When building 'octave-gpc' on i386/testing, I get the following error: /usr/bin/mkoctfile -v -s -c gpc_create.cc /usr/bin/g++ -c -fPIC -I/usr/include/octave-2.1.69 -I/usr/include/octave-2.1.69/octave -O2 gpc_create.cc -o gpc_create.o gpc_create.cc: In function `octave_value_list Fgpc_create(const octave_value_list, int)': gpc_create.cc:81: error: no match for 'operator[]' in '*m[vertices]' gpc_create.cc:84: error: no match for 'operator[]' in '*m[indices]' gpc_create.cc:86: error: no match for 'operator[]' in '*m[hole]' make[1]: *** [gpc_create.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/octave-gpc-0.1.4' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 The newer version 0.1.5-4 in sid builds fine. Well, it is not octave-gpc's fault if its newest version is not in sarge yet. According to http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=octave-gpc, we have: # trying to update octave-gpc from 0.1.4-1 to 0.1.5-4 (candidate is 60 days old) # octave-gpc is waiting for gpcl * gpcl is not yet built on alpha: 2.31-5 vs 2.32-1 (missing 2 binaries: libgpcl-dev, libgpcl0) [...] gpcl is in non-free and octave-gpc is in contrib. How could this problem be fixed? -- Rafael ___ Pkg-octave-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-octave-devel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307188: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#307188: octave-gpc: FTBFS: no match for 'operator[]' in '*m[vertices]'
* Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-05-01 14:27]: On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 06:54:43PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: gpcl is in non-free and octave-gpc is in contrib. How could this problem be fixed? By getting gpcl updated on all architectures, requesting manual builds from the porter lists. Is this the case for everything in non-free? I'm starting a build for alpha here. Thanks. -- Rafael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307188: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#307188: octave-gpc: FTBFS: no match for 'operator[]' in '*m[vertices]'
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 11:05:50PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: * Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-05-01 14:27]: On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 06:54:43PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: gpcl is in non-free and octave-gpc is in contrib. How could this problem be fixed? By getting gpcl updated on all architectures, requesting manual builds from the porter lists. Is this the case for everything in non-free? Yes, and it always has been. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#307188: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#307188: octave-gpc: FTBFS: no match for 'operator[]' in '*m[vertices]'
[Cc: to debian-release] * Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-05-01 15:16]: Package: octave-gpc Version: 0.1.4-1 Severity: serious Tags: sarge When building 'octave-gpc' on i386/testing, I get the following error: /usr/bin/mkoctfile -v -s -c gpc_create.cc /usr/bin/g++ -c -fPIC -I/usr/include/octave-2.1.69 -I/usr/include/octave-2.1.69/octave -O2 gpc_create.cc -o gpc_create.o gpc_create.cc: In function `octave_value_list Fgpc_create(const octave_value_list, int)': gpc_create.cc:81: error: no match for 'operator[]' in '*m[vertices]' gpc_create.cc:84: error: no match for 'operator[]' in '*m[indices]' gpc_create.cc:86: error: no match for 'operator[]' in '*m[hole]' make[1]: *** [gpc_create.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/octave-gpc-0.1.4' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 The newer version 0.1.5-4 in sid builds fine. Well, it is not octave-gpc's fault if its newest version is not in sarge yet. According to http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=octave-gpc, we have: # trying to update octave-gpc from 0.1.4-1 to 0.1.5-4 (candidate is 60 days old) # octave-gpc is waiting for gpcl * gpcl is not yet built on alpha: 2.31-5 vs 2.32-1 (missing 2 binaries: libgpcl-dev, libgpcl0) [...] gpcl is in non-free and octave-gpc is in contrib. How could this problem be fixed? -- Rafael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307188: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#307188: octave-gpc: FTBFS: no match for 'operator[]' in '*m[vertices]'
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 06:54:43PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: [Cc: to debian-release] * Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-05-01 15:16]: Package: octave-gpc Version: 0.1.4-1 Severity: serious Tags: sarge When building 'octave-gpc' on i386/testing, I get the following error: /usr/bin/mkoctfile -v -s -c gpc_create.cc /usr/bin/g++ -c -fPIC -I/usr/include/octave-2.1.69 -I/usr/include/octave-2.1.69/octave -O2 gpc_create.cc -o gpc_create.o gpc_create.cc: In function `octave_value_list Fgpc_create(const octave_value_list, int)': gpc_create.cc:81: error: no match for 'operator[]' in '*m[vertices]' gpc_create.cc:84: error: no match for 'operator[]' in '*m[indices]' gpc_create.cc:86: error: no match for 'operator[]' in '*m[hole]' make[1]: *** [gpc_create.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/octave-gpc-0.1.4' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 The newer version 0.1.5-4 in sid builds fine. Well, it is not octave-gpc's fault if its newest version is not in sarge yet. According to http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=octave-gpc, we have: # trying to update octave-gpc from 0.1.4-1 to 0.1.5-4 (candidate is 60 days old) # octave-gpc is waiting for gpcl * gpcl is not yet built on alpha: 2.31-5 vs 2.32-1 (missing 2 binaries: libgpcl-dev, libgpcl0) [...] gpcl is in non-free and octave-gpc is in contrib. How could this problem be fixed? By getting gpcl updated on all architectures, requesting manual builds from the porter lists. I'm starting a build for alpha here. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
