Bug#307746: smbclient: Port option (-p) is ignored
tags 307746 + confirmed fixed-upstream pending thanks Hello, the reported bug is fixed with upstream the 3.0.20 release of samba: * BUG 2688: re-implement support for the -P (--port) option The coming debian package upload will fix this bug. -- Noèl Köthe noel debian.org Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#307746: smbclient: Port option (-p) is ignored
Hi, any idea when this bug will be fixed in debian sarge? In the samba code it's already fixed, and there is a patch mentioned in https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2688. smbclient 3.0.14a-6 is still broken! Regards, Ralf
Bug#307746: smbclient: Port option (-p) is ignored
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 03:01:38PM +0200, Ralf Gross wrote: any idea when this bug will be fixed in debian sarge? It will not be. Sarge is released, and this bug doesn't meet the requirements for a stable update. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#307746: smbclient: Port option (-p) is ignored
tags 307746 upstream forwarded 307746 https://bugzilla.samba.org/bug/2688 thanks Looks like someone else has reported it as well. See https://bugzilla.samba.org/bug/2688. I'll track it from there. Tagging this bug, then (Eloy, Steve, OK with that way for tagging?) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307746: smbclient: Port option (-p) is ignored
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Christian Perrier wrote: | Jerry, Jeremy, this is from Debian BTS... | | Quoting Frank Chung ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): |Package: smbclient |Version: 3.0.14a-1 |Severity: normal | |I have a samba server listening on port 1390. To use smbclient to connect to |it, I have to use the -p 1390 option. | |Since upgrading to 3.0.14a-1, smbclient has started ignoring -p (or - --port, |for that matter): | |# smbclient -U user -W DOMAIN -p 1390 //server/share |timeout connecting to 160.19.25.253:445 |timeout connecting to 160.19.25.253:139 |Error connecting to 160.19.25.253 (Operation already in progress) |Connection to 160.19.25.253 failed Looks like someone else has reported it as well. See https://bugzilla.samba.org/bug/2688. I'll track it from there. cheers, jerry = Alleviating the pain of Windows(tm) --- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key- http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc I never saved anything for the swim back. Ethan Hawk in Gattaca -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCfg1xIR7qMdg1EfYRAmT8AKCAghkhiZJGb2RmgvtIr5n7Dg4wKwCgsha4 3t3Kf/wSJpL6hRf5ifnuGWg= =w1gq -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307746: smbclient: Port option (-p) is ignored
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Christian Perrier wrote: | Jerry, Jeremy, this is from Debian BTS... | | Quoting Frank Chung ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): |Package: smbclient |Version: 3.0.14a-1 |Severity: normal | | I have a samba server listening on port 1390. To use | smbclient to connect to it, I have to use the -p 1390 | option. Christian, This is my bug I'm pretty sure. If I haven't mailed you back with a fix by mid-week, ping me about it again. Thanks. cheers, jerry = Alleviating the pain of Windows(tm) --- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key- http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc I never saved anything for the swim back. Ethan Hawk in Gattaca -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCfMrMIR7qMdg1EfYRAkENAKDA+InU+HM2bAgDqOZD/YXgz7Y1XQCgo+hK X6gLIEsEnFEi48tn7ngJjnI= =Kk6U -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307746: smbclient: Port option (-p) is ignored
Package: smbclient Version: 3.0.14a-1 Severity: normal I have a samba server listening on port 1390. To use smbclient to connect to it, I have to use the -p 1390 option. Since upgrading to 3.0.14a-1, smbclient has started ignoring -p (or --port, for that matter): # smbclient -U user -W DOMAIN -p 1390 //server/share timeout connecting to 160.19.25.253:445 timeout connecting to 160.19.25.253:139 Error connecting to 160.19.25.253 (Operation already in progress) Connection to 160.19.25.253 failed Thanks and Regards, Frank -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-3 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages smbclient depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcomerr2 1.37-2 common error description library ii libkrb531.3.6-2 MIT Kerberos runtime libraries ii libldap22.1.30-3 OpenLDAP libraries ii libncurses5 5.4-4Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libpopt01.7-5lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii libreadline44.3-11 GNU readline and history libraries ii samba-common3.0.14a-1Samba common files used by both th -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307746: smbclient: Port option (-p) is ignored
Jerry, Jeremy, this is from Debian BTS... Quoting Frank Chung ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Package: smbclient Version: 3.0.14a-1 Severity: normal I have a samba server listening on port 1390. To use smbclient to connect to it, I have to use the -p 1390 option. Since upgrading to 3.0.14a-1, smbclient has started ignoring -p (or --port, for that matter): # smbclient -U user -W DOMAIN -p 1390 //server/share timeout connecting to 160.19.25.253:445 timeout connecting to 160.19.25.253:139 Error connecting to 160.19.25.253 (Operation already in progress) Connection to 160.19.25.253 failed By quickly looking at 3.0.14a release notes: * BUG 2588: Force smbclient to send netbios messages to port 139 unless otherwise instructed (based on patch from Thomas Bork). The patch is listed in Jerry's list, hence CC'ing himI have no idea whether that patch is related to the reported behaviour, but it seems to be the only change which could have triggered it (Jeremy CC'ed as well, just to nag him and show that Debian indeed tries to poke with upstream..:-))) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
