Bug#310847: courier: version 0.50 is available
Hello Stefan, courier 0.50 is a long time in experimental, when do you plan to upload it to unstable? Greets, Jonas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#310847: courier: version 0.50 is available
Olaf van der Spek wrote: On 10/18/05, Stefan Hornburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Never, but I'm now pretty close with Courier 0.52.1. I expect that I need a few weeks to test out upgrade issues. Great. Will that include the mkpopdcert I send you? On that note, is 0.5* expected into testing soonish? Is there anything that people, namely myself, can help with inorder to get it in there quicker? cheers Nathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#310847: courier: version 0.50 is available
Hi Racke, I plan to upload Courier 0.50 to experimental next week. (Fri, 27 May 2005 17:01:50 +0200) When can this version be expected in unstable?
Bug#310847: courier: version 0.50 is available
On 10/18/05, Stefan Hornburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Never, but I'm now pretty close with Courier 0.52.1. I expect that I need a few weeks to test out upgrade issues. Great. Will that include the mkpopdcert I send you?
Bug#310847: courier: version 0.50 is available
Olaf van der Spek wrote: Hi Racke, I plan to upload Courier 0.50 to experimental next week. (Fri, 27 May 2005 17:01:50 +0200) When can this version be expected in unstable? Never, but I'm now pretty close with Courier 0.52.1. I expect that I need a few weeks to test out upgrade issues. Bye Racke -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#310847: courier: version 0.50 is available
Olaf van der Spek wrote: On 10/18/05, Stefan Hornburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Never, but I'm now pretty close with Courier 0.52.1. I expect that I need a few weeks to test out upgrade issues. Great. Will that include the mkpopdcert I send you? It will include probably a mkcouriercert :-). Bye Racke -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#310847: courier: version 0.50 is available
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 11:51:16AM +0200, Stefan Hornburg wrote: Olaf van der Spek wrote: Hi Racke, I plan to upload Courier 0.50 to experimental next week. (Fri, 27 May 2005 17:01:50 +0200) When can this version be expected in unstable? Never, but I'm now pretty close with Courier 0.52.1. I expect that I need a few weeks to test out upgrade issues. 0.50 from experimental recompiled for sarge working fine ... can you send me URL with debianized sources for 0.52.1 ??? i can test it with all my patches and changes (for example with trashquota) -- 5o Peter.Mann at tuke.sk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#310847: courier: version 0.50 is available
On 10/18/05, Stefan Hornburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Olaf van der Spek wrote: On 10/18/05, Stefan Hornburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Never, but I'm now pretty close with Courier 0.52.1. I expect that I need a few weeks to test out upgrade issues. Great. Will that include the mkpopdcert I send you? It will include probably a mkcouriercert :-). Nice. Has it been written already? If so, could I see it. Does it use the host name as the common name (by default) instead of localhost? And does it not use the other fields (by default)?
Bug#310847: courier: version 0.50 is available
Olaf van der Spek wrote: On 10/18/05, Stefan Hornburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Olaf van der Spek wrote: On 10/18/05, Stefan Hornburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Never, but I'm now pretty close with Courier 0.52.1. I expect that I need a few weeks to test out upgrade issues. Great. Will that include the mkpopdcert I send you? It will include probably a mkcouriercert :-). Nice. Has it been written already? If so, could I see it. To be honest, no. But there are enough bugs to warrant a decent script which can be steered by commandline parameters instead of the .cnf approach. If there is another Debian package which does this already, I would gladly devour its code instead of starting from scratch. Does it use the host name as the common name (by default) instead of localhost? And does it not use the other fields (by default)? Maybe /etc/mailname should be used if nothing else is specified. What do you think ? Bye Racke -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#310847: courier: version 0.50 is available
Peter Mann wrote: On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 11:51:16AM +0200, Stefan Hornburg wrote: Olaf van der Spek wrote: Hi Racke, I plan to upload Courier 0.50 to experimental next week. (Fri, 27 May 2005 17:01:50 +0200) When can this version be expected in unstable? Never, but I'm now pretty close with Courier 0.52.1. I expect that I need a few weeks to test out upgrade issues. 0.50 from experimental recompiled for sarge working fine ... can you send me URL with debianized sources for 0.52.1 ??? i can test it with all my patches and changes (for example with trashquota) deb-src http://debian.linuxia.de/ courier-test main Disclaimer: This is work in progress and may hose your system. A fresh upload to experimental is planned, but only if I'm pretty certain about the package structure to avoid unnecessary delays by the introduction of new packages. Bye Racke -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#310847: courier: version 0.50 is available
On 10/18/05, Stefan Hornburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nice. Has it been written already? If so, could I see it. To be honest, no. But there are enough bugs to warrant a decent script which can be steered by commandline parameters instead of the .cnf approach. If there is another Debian package which does this already, Please ensure the script can easily be rerun without requiring all values to be entered again though. I would gladly devour its code instead of starting from scratch. I'm not sure, but I heard freeswan may have a good certificate setup. I do know exim4 is in need of a good setup script too. Does it use the host name as the common name (by default) instead of localhost? And does it not use the other fields (by default)? Maybe /etc/mailname should be used if nothing else is specified. What do you think ? That indeed sounds like an ever better option.
Bug#310847: courier: version 0.50 is available
On Thu, 26 May 2005 14:52:45 +0300 Wladimir Mutel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: courier Severity: wishlist Courier versions 0.48,0.49 and 0.50 were already released. With various fixes/improvements as can be read below. http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=9566483 http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=11062332 http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=11739431 Would be great to see new version packed into .debs I would test your experimental build to give you a feed back : I plan to upload Courier 0.50 to experimental next week. Bye Racke -- LinuXia Systems = http://www.linuxia.de/ Expert Interchange Consulting and System Administration ICDEVGROUP = http://www.icdevgroup.org/ Interchange Development Team -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
