Bug#317418: Updated Sarge package available

2006-12-01 Thread Paul Slootman
On Fri 01 Dec 2006, Andy Spiegl wrote:
 
   Also, I tried to backport it to sarge (where I urgently need it)
   but didn't succeed because of many compile time errors. :-(
  
  How did you try to build it?
  apt-get source rsync
  cd rsync-2.6.9
  dpkg-buildpackage -uc -m[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Aiii, I forgot the -B and therefore didn't notice that I need
 libpopt-dev and libacl1-dev.  Just redid it now and it worked!
 
  You can try http://xxx/rsync_2.6.9-0.sarge.2_i386.deb
 Hm, that leaves me with a new problem:
 
 dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of rsync:
  rsync depends on lsb-base (= 3.0); however:
   Version of lsb-base on system is 2.0-7.
 
 So I guess that means that I have to install lsb from backports.org,

If you save the old init.d script from 2.6.8, you can override that
dependency. Or get rsync_2.6.9-0.sarge.2.1_i386.deb from the same place
I mentioned before (please keep that location confidential! I can't
afford a lot of bandwidth there). That has the old init.d script and the
old dependencies.

 But since I really need the fix, I installed it on just 1 of my servers and
 the backup server.  And here is more bad news: the patches didn't solve the
 problem. :-((
 
 Proof:
 
 server1:~#touch /var/www/some/subdir/testfile
 server1:~#/usr/bin/rsync -v --archive --relative --delete --delete-excluded 
 --compress --protocol=28 --exclude-from=/var/local/dom/def/backup.exclude 
 /var/www/ backupserver::server1_backup/
 building file list ... done
 var/www/some/subdir/
 /var/www/some/subdir/testfile
 
 server1:~#rm /var/www/some/subdir/testfile
 server1:~#/usr/bin/rsync -v --archive --relative --delete --delete-excluded 
 --compress --protocol=28 --exclude-from=/var/local/dom/def/backup.exclude 
 /var/www/ backupserver::server1_backup/
 building file list ... done
 var/www/some/subdir/
 
 
 As you can see it doesn't delete the testfile which resides in some
 subdirectory. :-(

(Why pass --protocol=28, BTW?)
I tried to reproduce this... (I used /dev/null for the exclude-from as
you don't show what's in there, and it shouldn't matter.)

receiver$ cat /etc/rsyncd.conf
[bla]
path = /tmp/rsync
uid = paul
read only = no

sender$ mkdir -p /tmp/rsync/a
sender$ touch /tmp/rsync/a/file
sender$ /usr/bin/rsync -v --archive --relative --delete --delete-excluded 
--compress --protocol=28 --exclude-from=/dev/null /tmp/rsync/a/ receiver::bla/
building file list ... done
tmp/
tmp/rsync/
tmp/rsync/a/
/tmp/rsync/a/file

sent 186 bytes  received 32 bytes  436.00 bytes/sec
total size is 29  speedup is 0.13
sender$ rm /tmp/rsync/a/file
sender$ /usr/bin/rsync -v --archive --relative --delete --delete-excluded 
--compress --protocol=28 --exclude-from=/dev/null /tmp/rsync/a/ 10.41.1.20::bla/
building file list ... done
deleting tmp/rsync/a/file
tmp/rsync/a/

sent 100 bytes  received 12 bytes  224.00 bytes/sec
total size is 0  speedup is 0.00


As you see, this works fine for me...


Paul Slootman


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#317418: Updated Sarge package available

2006-11-30 Thread Andy Spiegl
Hi Paul,

 There's a prerelease of 2.6.9 uploaded to experimental, 2.6.9~pre3-1
 It also has ACL support patched in.

Thanks for the note.  I am out of town for a while (actually out of
continent :-) so I didn't check until just now.
I found 2.6.9-2 on unstable, but I don't see any mentioning of this
bug in the changelog...?

Also, I tried to backport it to sarge (where I urgently need it)
but didn't succeed because of many compile time errors. :-(

Do you know maybe of anybody who already backported it?
(nothing in http://backports.org/debian/pool/main/r/rsync/)

Thanks so much,
 Andy.

-- 
 Some say time is the fire in which we burn  -- Dr. Soren


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#317418: Updated Sarge package available

2006-11-30 Thread Andy Spiegl
Hi Paul,

  Also, I tried to backport it to sarge (where I urgently need it)
  but didn't succeed because of many compile time errors. :-(
 
 How did you try to build it?
 apt-get source rsync
 cd rsync-2.6.9
 dpkg-buildpackage -uc -m[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Aiii, I forgot the -B and therefore didn't notice that I need
libpopt-dev and libacl1-dev.  Just redid it now and it worked!

 You can try http://paul.gps.nl/rsync_2.6.9-0.sarge.2_i386.deb
Hm, that leaves me with a new problem:

dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of rsync:
 rsync depends on lsb-base (= 3.0); however:
  Version of lsb-base on system is 2.0-7.

So I guess that means that I have to install lsb from backports.org,
but that requires that I also upgrade these:
  alien gcc-3.4-base libaudio2 libmng1 libqt3c102-mt libqt4-core libqt4-gui 
  libqt4-qt3support libqt4-sql librpm4 libstdc++6 lprng lsb-release pax 
  qt4-qtconfig rpm 

Uffda, that's a lot of requirements for just a simple fix. :-(

But since I really need the fix, I installed it on just 1 of my servers and
the backup server.  And here is more bad news: the patches didn't solve the
problem. :-((

Proof:

server1:~#touch /var/www/some/subdir/testfile
server1:~#/usr/bin/rsync -v --archive --relative --delete --delete-excluded 
--compress --protocol=28 --exclude-from=/var/local/dom/def/backup.exclude 
/var/www/ backupserver::server1_backup/
building file list ... done
var/www/some/subdir/
/var/www/some/subdir/testfile

server1:~#rm /var/www/some/subdir/testfile
server1:~#/usr/bin/rsync -v --archive --relative --delete --delete-excluded 
--compress --protocol=28 --exclude-from=/var/local/dom/def/backup.exclude 
/var/www/ backupserver::server1_backup/
building file list ... done
var/www/some/subdir/


As you can see it doesn't delete the testfile which resides in some
subdirectory. :-(

Thanks,
 Andy.

-- 
 I said no to drugs, but they just wouldn't listen!


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#317418: Updated Sarge package available

2006-11-02 Thread Paul Slootman
On Thu 21 Sep 2006, Andy Spiegl wrote:
 
  A 2.6.9 version of rsync is imminent
 Great.  Would you mind sending a mail (and to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
 when it's available?

There's a prerelease of 2.6.9 uploaded to experimental, 2.6.9~pre3-1
It also has ACL support patched in.


Paul Slootman


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#317418: Updated Sarge package available

2006-09-21 Thread Andy Spiegl
  Whoops! Please send over a large trout, I must be confused by the
  bugs :)
 
 No problem.  You can make up for it by backporting it again :)))

Are there any plans for a new backport?

Hm, actually I wonder whether the patch even made it into sid yet.
Does anyone know?

Thanks,
 Andy.

-- 
 You almost always get what you pay for. Other times, you get less.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#317418: Updated Sarge package available

2006-09-21 Thread Paul Slootman
On Thu 21 Sep 2006, Andy Spiegl wrote:
 
 Hm, actually I wonder whether the patch even made it into sid yet.

A 2.6.9 version of rsync is imminent, and should have that fix (and a couple
of other important fixes) in it, so I prefer to wait a bit for that.


Paul Slootman


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#317418: Updated Sarge package available

2006-09-12 Thread Andy Spiegl
Wonderful!
When can we expect the Debian package to include this patch?
(especially the backported version would be greeeat)

Thanks,
 Andy.


Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
 
 Ah, I got a prompt answer from Wayne on the rsync list. I'll attach it.
 
[...]
 
 This is a different bug that was recently fixed:  using --relative with
 a root (/) filesystem and --delete was also failing to delete.  The
 latest CVS source and recent nightly tar files have this fixed.  Here's
 the bug (which has an attached patch):
 
 https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3929
 
 ..wayne..
 

Chau,
 Andy.

-- 
 When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign:
 that the fools are all in confederacy against him.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#317418: Updated Sarge package available

2006-09-12 Thread Serge van Ginderachter
On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 19:28 +0200, Andy Spiegl wrote:

 When can we expect the Debian package to include this patch?
 (especially the backported version would be greeeat)

I backported it a long time ago, I thought it was referenced in this bug
thread? Anyway, you can pick up the package here

 deb http://www.vanginderachter.be/downloads/debian/packages/archives sarge main



Serge

-- 
Serge van Ginderachter
  
http://www.vanginderachter.be/

Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere
in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#317418: Updated Sarge package available

2006-09-12 Thread Andy Spiegl
 Whoops! Please send over a large trout, I must be confused by the
 bugs :)

No problem.  You can make up for it by backporting it again :)))

Andy.

-- 
 Many people easily confuse innovation with the latest
 influenza epidemia from Redmond.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#317418: Updated Sarge package available

2006-09-12 Thread Andy Spiegl
Hi Serge,

 I backported it a long time ago, I thought it was referenced in this bug
 thread? Anyway, you can pick up the package here
 
  deb http://www.vanginderachter.be/downloads/debian/packages/archives sarge 
 main

Wonderful!  However... your last changelog.Debian entry was in
September 2005, and the patch is from 2006-08-26.
 https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3929

So somehow I doubt that you already included that patch. :-)

Thanks a lot,
 Andy.

-- 
 If life is just a highway, then the soul is just a car, and objects in
 the rear-view mirror may appear closer than they are.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#317418: Updated Sarge package available

2006-09-12 Thread Serge van Ginderachter
 Wonderful!  However... your last changelog.Debian entry was in
 September 2005, and the patch is from 2006-08-26.
  https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3929
 
 So somehow I doubt that you already included that patch. :-)

Whoops! Please send over a large trout, I must be confused by the
bugs :)


Serge

-- 
Serge van Ginderachter
  
http://www.vanginderachter.be/

Failing to plan is planning to fail.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#317418: Updated Sarge package available

2006-09-09 Thread Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 06:53:30PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
 Because I couldn't reproduce it, and I didn't want to close a bug report

Huh? This should be very simple reproducible by just following the
http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2005-April/012335.html

And yes, with the current rsync/unstable it is not reproducible this
way, i.e. the patch works for that :)

 I had not seen confirmed that it was fixed (although I'm pretty

However, unfortunately it's not fully fixed either :/
I just stumbled over it while noticing that my rsnapshot root backup
never gets any file deleted...

So I made some tests:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# rsync -HSaxvn --delete --numeric-ids --relative 
--delete-excluded --exclude=lost+found/ / /mnt/rsnapshot/daily.0/darkside/root 
| grep -c ^deleting
0
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# rsync -HSaxvn --delete --numeric-ids --delete-excluded 
--exclude=lost+found/ / /mnt/rsnapshot/daily.0/darkside/root | grep -c ^deleting
264
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# cd /
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# rsync -HSaxvn --delete --numeric-ids --relative 
--delete-excluded --exclude=lost+found/ . /mnt/rsnapshot/daily.0/darkside/root 
| grep -c ^deleting
264
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# cd
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# rsync -HSaxvn --delete --numeric-ids --relative 
--delete-excluded --exclude=lost+found/ /. /mnt/rsnapshot/daily.0/darkside/root 
| grep -c ^deleting
0
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~#

As you can see, without --relative deletion works well, with --relative
it's not that simple to work around it (except the cd /, which doesn't not
work in case you rsync some.host:/ :)). If you have an idea for another
workaround, please let me know :)

 I meant to say I never encountered it, and there was a pretty simple
 workaround (drop the trailing slash). Your report that that doesn't help

Well, this is not always that simple :)


PS: CC: to rsnapshot-maintainer.


regards
   Mario
-- 
Programmieren in C++ haelt die grauen Zellen am Leben. Es schaerft
alle fuenf Sinne: den Schwachsinn, den Bloedsinn, den Wahnsinn, den
Unsinn und den Stumpfsinn.
 [Holger Veit in doc]


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#317418: Updated Sarge package available

2006-09-09 Thread Simon Boulet

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi

On 9-Sep-06, at 9:32 AM, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:


On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 06:53:30PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
Because I couldn't reproduce it, and I didn't want to close a bug  
report





I was able to reproduce this bug with the latest rsync and rsnapshot  
from stable


# rsync --version
rsync  version 2.6.4  protocol version 29
# rsnapshot
rsnapshot 1.2.1


First rsnapshot run:

# rsnapshot daily
# ls -lR daily.0/test/test/
daily.0/test/test/:
total 0
drwxr-xr-x  3 root root 14 2006-09-09 11:09 src

daily.0/test/test/src:
total 0
drwxr-xr-x  2 root root 30 2006-09-09 11:15 1

daily.0/test/test/src/1:
total 0
- -rw-r--r--  1 root root 0 2006-09-09 11:15 a
- -rw-r--r--  1 root root 0 2006-09-09 11:09 b
- -rw-r--r--  1 root root 0 2006-09-09 11:09 c


Remove file 'a' from the source directory:

# rm /test/src/1/a


Second rsnapshot run:

# rsnapshot daily
# ls -lR daily.0/test/test/
daily.0/test/test/:
total 0
drwxr-xr-x  3 root root 14 2006-09-09 11:09 src

daily.0/test/test/src:
total 0
drwxr-xr-x  2 root root 30 2006-09-09 11:15 1

daily.0/test/test/src/1:
total 0
- -rw-r--r--  2 root root 0 2006-09-09 11:15 a
- -rw-r--r--  2 root root 0 2006-09-09 11:09 b
- -rw-r--r--  2 root root 0 2006-09-09 11:09 c


Rsnapshot used /usr/bin/rsync -a --delete --numeric-ids --relative -- 
delete-excluded /test/ /home/backup/test/daily.0/test/






I meant to say I never encountered it, and there was a pretty simple
workaround (drop the trailing slash). Your report that that  
doesn't help


Well, this is not always that simple :)



A trailing slashes patch was introduced in rsnapshot 1.2.1-1.1 and  
later reviewed in 1.2.1-2, both went into unstable. This patch was to  
fix an issue with latest versions of GNU cp in testing/unstable. Now  
it seems you discovered a similar bug with the stable version of rsync.


Please try installing the latest rsnapshot 1.2.9-1 from testing. Most  
of the code was reviewed in 1.2.9 and trailing slashes were  
completely removed.


Thanks

Simon




-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFFAuRy1jAZg9vxR6wRAtFtAJ4oWxSDyQqvBeB0HNi1G8G3YwIF6gCggnOp
4wpuImr7kZFVqUNKvsPPi/w=
=6NIA
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#317418: Updated Sarge package available

2006-09-09 Thread Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 11:57:34AM -0400, Simon Boulet wrote:
 On 9-Sep-06, at 9:32 AM, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
  On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 06:53:30PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
  Because I couldn't reproduce it, and I didn't want to close a bug  
  report
 I was able to reproduce this bug with the latest rsync and rsnapshot  
 from stable

Yes, this might be the case because this is just not fixed in stable :)
As Paul clearly states in the bug, btw. :)

  workaround (drop the trailing slash). Your report that that  
  Well, this is not always that simple :)
 A trailing slashes patch was introduced in rsnapshot 1.2.1-1.1 and  

Well, my comment was more pointing to the fact that you simply *cannot*
remove the trailing slash of / :)

 later reviewed in 1.2.1-2, both went into unstable. This patch was to  
 fix an issue with latest versions of GNU cp in testing/unstable. Now  
 it seems you discovered a similar bug with the stable version of rsync.

Well, I'm running unstable :)

ii  rsnapshot  1.2.9-1local and remote filesystem snapshot utility
ii  rsync  2.6.8-2fast remote file copy program (like rcp)

Just to make this clear: I did only CC: you because you are the (new)
maintainer of rsnapshot and you've not been involved til now - in
contrast to the old maintainers :) However, since this issue directly
affects you you should at least know about it, IMHO :)
I did not CC: you to fix this, because it is clearly a rsync problem, not
a problem of rsnapshot. The latter is just affected.


Mario
-- 
[mod_nessus for iauth]
delta scanning your system...found depreciated OS...found
hole...installing new OS...please reboot and reconnect now


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#317418: Updated Sarge package available

2006-09-09 Thread Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 03:32:08PM +0200, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
 However, unfortunately it's not fully fixed either :/
 I just stumbled over it while noticing that my rsnapshot root backup
 never gets any file deleted...

Ah, I got a prompt answer from Wayne on the rsync list. I'll attach it.


Mario
-- 
delta talk softly and carry a keen sword
---BeginMessage---
On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 09:00:10PM +0200, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# rsync -HSaxvn --delete --relative / 
 /mnt/rsnapshot/daily.0/darkside/root | grep -c ^deleting
 0

This is a different bug that was recently fixed:  using --relative with
a root (/) filesystem and --delete was also failing to delete.  The
latest CVS source and recent nightly tar files have this fixed.  Here's
the bug (which has an attached patch):

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3929

..wayne..

---End Message---


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#317418: Updated Sarge package available

2006-09-01 Thread Andy Spiegl
Hi, I just stumpled over this same bug.  :-(
My backup disks were spilling because rsync never deleted files!

Unfortunately the patch provided by Serge doesn't work
when rsync connects to an rsync-server.  In that case
the --delete option STILL doesn't work as expected.

Leaving off the trailing slash doesn't help either. :-(

 Upstream has also been updated on this.
 
 Is there any way where this patch could go into Sarge?
Yes, pleaaase.  The bug is over a year old...

Thanks,
 Andy.

-- 
 It pains me physically to see a woman victimized, rendered pathetic, by 
fashion.
   (Yves Saint Laurent, French designer)


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#317418: Updated Sarge package available

2006-09-01 Thread Paul Slootman
On Fri 01 Sep 2006, Andy Spiegl wrote:

 Hi, I just stumpled over this same bug.  :-(
 My backup disks were spilling because rsync never deleted files!
 
 Unfortunately the patch provided by Serge doesn't work
 when rsync connects to an rsync-server.  In that case
 the --delete option STILL doesn't work as expected.
 
 Leaving off the trailing slash doesn't help either. :-(
 
  Upstream has also been updated on this.
  
  Is there any way where this patch could go into Sarge?
 Yes, pleaaase.  The bug is over a year old...

... and has been fixed, in testing and unstable, for about just as long.

stable is called stable because it basically doesn't change.
Security fixes make it to point releases, but not simple bug fixes.
(BTW, I have never seen the bug myself, and I run rsync on dozens of
systems.)

You may want to check out http://www.backports.org/ for a backported
version of a modern rsync release that's suitable for your stable
system.


Paul Slootman


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#317418: Updated Sarge package available

2006-09-01 Thread Andy Spiegl
 ... and has been fixed, in testing and unstable, for about just as long.
Even in combination when connecting to a rsync server?
But then why is the bug report still open?

 stable is called stable because it basically doesn't change.
 Security fixes make it to point releases, but not simple bug fixes.
Well yes, but I'd consider this a pretty severe bug which would be worth
fixing in sarge.

 (BTW, I have never seen the bug myself, and I run rsync on dozens of
 systems.)
Then you are probably not using --relative.

 You may want to check out http://www.backports.org/ for a backported
 version of a modern rsync release that's suitable for your stable
 system.
Thanks, I'll try that next week.
But I can't find anything about it in the changelog of the package...

Chau,
 Andy.

-- 
 I got rid of my husband.  The cat was allergic.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#317418: Updated Sarge package available

2006-09-01 Thread Paul Slootman
On Fri 01 Sep 2006, Andy Spiegl wrote:

  ... and has been fixed, in testing and unstable, for about just as long.
 Even in combination when connecting to a rsync server?
 But then why is the bug report still open?

Because I couldn't reproduce it, and I didn't want to close a bug report
I had not seen confirmed that it was fixed (although I'm pretty
confident that it is). So if it works for you with the backports
version, I'd love to hear it.

  stable is called stable because it basically doesn't change.
  Security fixes make it to point releases, but not simple bug fixes.
 Well yes, but I'd consider this a pretty severe bug which would be worth
 fixing in sarge.

Unfortunately, that's not up to me :-(

  (BTW, I have never seen the bug myself, and I run rsync on dozens of
  systems.)
 Then you are probably not using --relative.

That could be true :)
That said, all my systems run the latest and greatest anyway...
I meant to say I never encountered it, and there was a pretty simple
workaround (drop the trailing slash). Your report that that doesn't help
when connecting to an rsync server is news.

  You may want to check out http://www.backports.org/ for a backported
  version of a modern rsync release that's suitable for your stable
  system.
 Thanks, I'll try that next week.
 But I can't find anything about it in the changelog of the package...

Did you check the rsync changelog? (I.e. not the Debian changelog; I
won't list _all_ the rsync upstream changes in the Debian changelog...)
If it's not there, then upstream probably forgot to mention it. As shown
in http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2005-April/012338.html upstream
(that's Wayne) had fixed it, and I would be most surprised if that fix
hadn't gone into the official source.


Paul Slootman


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#317418: Updated Sarge package available

2005-09-26 Thread Serge van Ginderachter


In can meanwhile confirm that this update also solves the problem in 
rsnapshot. Upstream has also been updated on this.


Is there any way where this patch could go into Sarge?

--
Serge van Ginderachter



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Bug#317418: Updated Sarge package available

2005-09-24 Thread Serge van Ginderachter


I can confirm that the bug is solved with the patch earlier

http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2005-April/012338.html

I updated the Sarge package - rsync version 2.6.4-6 with it and 
testrunned it using the --delete option, which works as expected.


'rsync_2.6.4-6.svg1_i386.deb' and full source can be downloaded here:

http://www.vanginderachter.be/downloads/debian/

I tried to build this package the Debian way, but as my experience with 
customising debian packages is very limited, it might be good if some 
more people could verify. Also, don't hesitate on giving me any feedback 
I could learn from, thanks.


I will further monitor the behavior of rsnapshot, which was broken in 
Sarge because of this bug. I expect that problem to be solved now in Sarge.


HTH,

--

Serge van Ginderachter


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]