Bug#321133: encfs: relocation error

2007-07-16 Thread Kurt Roeckx

Hi,

I'm closing this bug since:
The version in stable (etch, 0.9.7k-3.1) and
oldstable (sarge, 0.9.7e-3sarge4) both have the symbol in
libcrypto.so.


Kurt



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#321133: encfs: relocation error

2005-09-07 Thread Christoph Martin
Hi Steve,

Steve Langasek schrieb:
 When you get to the point that you're ready to package a new upstream
 version, I'd like to talk to you about some debhelper-based options that
 would let you reliably detect ABI changes, so you can avoid both ABI
 breakage and gratuitous package renames.

That sounds really good. Please go ahaid.

I am just preparing a new Debian version of openssl (0.9.7g-2) which
fixes some outstanding problems. After that I plan to release the new
upstream 0.9.8.

I have created an alioth project with an svn archive to coordinate the
work. The first commits are already done. I started with the current
stable version and the current unstable version. All work including
security updates can base on it. If anybody is interested in joining the
project, feel free to let me know.

Christoph

-- 

Christoph Martin, Leiter der EDV der Verwaltung, Uni-Mainz, Germany
 Internet-Mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Telefon: +49-6131-3926337
  Fax: +49-6131-3922856


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#321133: encfs: relocation error

2005-09-06 Thread Christoph Martin
severity 321133 normal
tags 321133 wontfix
thanks

Steve Langasek schrieb:
 Well, this version of libssl0.9.7 was never in a stable release; there was
 no libssl0.9.7 in woody, and sarge shipped with 0.9.7e-3.  So, since this
 problem wasn't noticed until now, that's definitely an unsupported
 configuration that isn't going to be fixed (there's no way we're going to go
 back now and change the package name in sarge).

openssl is still considered as unstable from upstream. So they change
ABI without notification. I can't do anything now since sarge is released.

I am considering changing the shlibs.local files any time when I release
a new upstream version.

Christoph

-- 

Christoph Martin, Leiter der EDV der Verwaltung, Uni-Mainz, Germany
 Internet-Mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Telefon: +49-6131-3926337
  Fax: +49-6131-3922856


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#321133: encfs: relocation error

2005-09-06 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 05:07:55PM +0200, Christoph Martin wrote:
 severity 321133 normal
 tags 321133 wontfix
 thanks

 Steve Langasek schrieb:
  Well, this version of libssl0.9.7 was never in a stable release; there was
  no libssl0.9.7 in woody, and sarge shipped with 0.9.7e-3.  So, since this
  problem wasn't noticed until now, that's definitely an unsupported
  configuration that isn't going to be fixed (there's no way we're going to go
  back now and change the package name in sarge).

 openssl is still considered as unstable from upstream. So they change
 ABI without notification. I can't do anything now since sarge is released.

 I am considering changing the shlibs.local files any time when I release
 a new upstream version.

When you get to the point that you're ready to package a new upstream
version, I'd like to talk to you about some debhelper-based options that
would let you reliably detect ABI changes, so you can avoid both ABI
breakage and gratuitous package renames.

Cheers,
-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#321133: encfs: relocation error

2005-08-03 Thread Matt Price
Package: encfs
Version: 1.2.3.1-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

hi there,

all attempts to use encfs result in the following error message: 

encfs: relocation error: /usr/lib/libencfs.so.1: undefined symbol:
EVP_bf_cfb64

I'm afraid I have no idea what that means...  
installed muse module using module-assistant as suggested in
README.Debian; fuse-utils is also installed.

matt


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.23-1-k7
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US

Versions of packages encfs depends on:
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libfuse22.3.0-1  Filesystem in USErspace library
ii  libgcc1 1:4.0.1-2GCC support library
ii  librlog1c2  1.3.6-2  flexible message logging library
ii  libssl0.9.7 0.9.7d-3 SSL shared libraries
ii  libstdc++6  4.0.1-2  The GNU Standard C++ Library v3

-- no debconf information

--
 .''`.   Matt Price 
: :'  :  Debian User
`. `'`hemi-geek
  `- 
-- 
if you're an evil spambot, these addresses are for you:  [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#321133: encfs: relocation error

2005-08-03 Thread Eduard Bloch
severity 321133 important
reassign 321133 libssl0.9.7
thanks

#include hallo.h
* Matt Price [Wed, Aug 03 2005, 01:11:29PM]:
 Package: encfs
 Version: 1.2.3.1-2
 Severity: grave
 Justification: renders package unusable
 
 hi there,
 
 all attempts to use encfs result in the following error message: 
 
 encfs: relocation error: /usr/lib/libencfs.so.1: undefined symbol:
 EVP_bf_cfb64

This looks like a symbol from libssl0.9.7, which is installed in a
stone-age version. Please upgrade to Debian Stable.

Though I wonder why libssl0.9.7 has changed the ABI without setting a
versioned dependency in the shlibs file. It is not documented in
changelog.Debian.gz either, I guess the maintainers is unaware of the
issue. And the number of affected users is comparably small.

Regards,
Eduard.

 ii  librlog1c2  1.3.6-2  flexible message logging library
 ii  libssl0.9.7 0.9.7d-3 SSL shared libraries
 ii  libstdc++6  4.0.1-2  The GNU Standard C++ Library v3



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#321133: encfs: relocation error

2005-08-03 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 07:55:28PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
 severity 321133 important
 reassign 321133 libssl0.9.7
 thanks

 #include hallo.h
 * Matt Price [Wed, Aug 03 2005, 01:11:29PM]:
  Package: encfs
  Version: 1.2.3.1-2
  Severity: grave
  Justification: renders package unusable

  hi there,

  all attempts to use encfs result in the following error message: 

  encfs: relocation error: /usr/lib/libencfs.so.1: undefined symbol:
  EVP_bf_cfb64

 This looks like a symbol from libssl0.9.7, which is installed in a
 stone-age version. Please upgrade to Debian Stable.

 Though I wonder why libssl0.9.7 has changed the ABI without setting a
 versioned dependency in the shlibs file. It is not documented in
 changelog.Debian.gz either, I guess the maintainers is unaware of the
 issue. And the number of affected users is comparably small.

  ii  librlog1c2  1.3.6-2  flexible message logging 
  library
  ii  libssl0.9.7 0.9.7d-3 SSL shared libraries

Well, this version of libssl0.9.7 was never in a stable release; there was
no libssl0.9.7 in woody, and sarge shipped with 0.9.7e-3.  So, since this
problem wasn't noticed until now, that's definitely an unsupported
configuration that isn't going to be fixed (there's no way we're going to go
back now and change the package name in sarge).

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature