Bug#321959: Bad section for libselinux1-dev and selinux-utils

2005-08-19 Thread Vincent Lefevre
reopen 321959
thanks

On 2005-08-13 23:23:06 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
 Are you sure? Here is the control file:
[...]

The problem is still there. If all is correct in the source, perhaps
the packages should be rebuilt?

BTW, http://packages.qa.debian.org/libs/libselinux.html says:

There were override disparities found in suite unstable:
* libselinux1: Override says libs - optional, .deb says base - required
* selinux-utils: Override says libs - optional, .deb says admin -
  optional ({partial})
* libselinux1-dev: Override says libs - optional, .deb says
  libdevel - optional ({partial})

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Web: http://www.vinc17.org/
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: http://www.vinc17.org/blog/
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#321959: Bad section for libselinux1-dev and selinux-utils

2005-08-14 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2005-08-13 23:23:06 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
 Are you sure? Here is the control file:

Yes:

dixsept:~ dpkg -s libselinux1-dev
Package: libselinux1-dev
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: libs
Installed-Size: 856
Maintainer: Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Architecture: i386
Source: libselinux
Version: 1.24-4
[...]

This is the version where you did the change, and it has
Section: libs. Wouldn't there be a bug with the utility
that builds the packages?

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Web: http://www.vinc17.org/
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: http://www.vinc17.org/blog/
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#321959: Bad section for libselinux1-dev and selinux-utils

2005-08-13 Thread Vincent Lefevre
reopen 321959
thanks

The sections are still incorrect in the 1.24-4 packages.

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Web: http://www.vinc17.org/
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: http://www.vinc17.org/blog/
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#321959: Bad section for libselinux1-dev and selinux-utils

2005-08-08 Thread Vincent Lefevre
Package: libselinux
Severity: minor

libselinux1-dev should be in Section libdevel and selinux-utils
should probably be in Section admin (instead of libs).

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.10-20050517
Locale: LANG=POSIX, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO8859-1 (charmap=ISO-8859-1)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]