Bug#326014: reassign to fnord

2005-11-12 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Gerrit Pape [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

  I think that you can reassign this bug to fnord. Ralf tested with the
  attached patch to fnord and now mailgraph works for him without
  problems. Note that the second chunk of the patch is probably not
  needed but I did leave it, since that's what Ralf tested...
  
  The author of fnord is informed and I am discussing with him about this
  problem.
 
 Hi, are there any news on this?  I can neither find a comment from
 upstream, nor any changes in the upstream CVS repository.

I changed from fnord to gatling on the machine in question. And,
alas, the bug doesn't manifest itself. So I guess Gerrit's comment on
gatling vs. fnord is probably right. 

Gerrit, how about packaging gatling :) ?

-- 
Ralf Hildebrandt (i.A. des IT-Zentrums) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charite - Universitätsmedizin BerlinTel.  +49 (0)30-450 570-155
Gemeinsame Einrichtung von FU- und HU-BerlinFax.  +49 (0)30-450 570-962
IT-Zentrum Standort CBF send no mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#326014: reassign to fnord

2005-11-10 Thread Gerrit Pape
tags 326014 - pending
quit

On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 08:32:28AM +0200, David Schweikert wrote:
 Hi Norbert,
 
 I think that you can reassign this bug to fnord. Ralf tested with the
 attached patch to fnord and now mailgraph works for him without
 problems. Note that the second chunk of the patch is probably not
 needed but I did leave it, since that's what Ralf tested...
 
 The author of fnord is informed and I am discussing with him about this
 problem.

Hi, are there any news on this?  I can neither find a comment from
upstream, nor any changes in the upstream CVS repository.

Thanks, Gerrit.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#326014: reassign to fnord

2005-10-21 Thread Norbert Tretkowski
reassign 326014 fnord
thanks

* David Schweikert wrote:
 I think that you can reassign this bug to fnord. Ralf tested with
 the attached patch to fnord and now mailgraph works for him without
 problems. Note that the second chunk of the patch is probably not
 needed but I did leave it, since that's what Ralf tested...
 
 The author of fnord is informed and I am discussing with him about
 this problem.

Thanks David, Bug reassigned to fnord.

Norbert


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#326014: reassign to fnord

2005-10-17 Thread David Schweikert
Hi Norbert,

I think that you can reassign this bug to fnord. Ralf tested with the
attached patch to fnord and now mailgraph works for him without
problems. Note that the second chunk of the patch is probably not
needed but I did leave it, since that's what Ralf tested...

The author of fnord is informed and I am discussing with him about this
problem.

Cheers
David
-- 
David Schweikert| phone: +41 44 632 7019
System manager ISG.EE   | walk:  ETH Zentrum, ETL F24.1
ETH Zurich, Switzerland | web:   http://people.ee.ethz.ch/dws
--- httpd.c.orig2005-08-03 13:32:50.0 +0200
+++ httpd.c 2005-10-13 21:35:58.912929000 +0200
@@ -531,7 +531,7 @@
 
   while(poll(pfd,nr,-1)!=-1) {
/* read from cgi */
-   if (pfd[0].reventsPOLLIN) {
+   if (pfd[0].revents(POLLIN|POLLHUP)) {
  if (!(n=read(fd[0],ibuf,sizeof(ibuf break;
  if (n0) goto cgi_500;
  /* startup */
@@ -564,7 +564,7 @@
buffer_put(buffer_1,ibuf,n);
  }
  size+=n;
- if (pfd[0].reventsPOLLHUP) break;
+ /*if (pfd[0].reventsPOLLHUP) break;*/
}
/* write to cgi the post data */
else if (nr1  pfd[1].reventsPOLLOUT) {
@@ -583,7 +583,6 @@
close(df[1]);
  }
}
-   else if (pfd[0].reventsPOLLHUP) break;
else {
 cgi_500:  if (startup)
badrequest(500,Internal Server Error,Looks like the CGI 
crashed.);