Bug#327018: [RFS] grace6: An XY plotting tool
Torsten Werner wrote: Package: grace6 Severity: grave Version: 5.99.0+final-7 Christoph Berg schrieb: Re: Li Daobing in [EMAIL PROTECTED] I want to adopt grace6[1]. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/307358 I rebuild grace6[2], lintian and linda clean. I have upload it to mentors.debian.net[3]. Hi, the package looks fine. Uploaded. A minor nit: update the maintainer name in debian/copyright for the next upload. Christoph Hello, DO NOT DO THAT AGAIN! RFH does not mean, that the package is not maintained. You should have coordinated the upload with the current maintainer - at least the ITA mail should be send some days/weeks *before* the upload. Ionut is the future maintainer who has coordinated with me. Ionut, please send your own ITA mail to the bug report mentioned above. We will discuss privately how to fix the problem. First, that's a RFA, not RFH[1]. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=307358 I think i am following the directive in [2]. And I am sorry that i am not familiar with the polite/rule you mentioned here. maybe you should submit a patch to improve this directive. [2] http://www.nl.debian.org/devel/wnpp/#l3 RFA If you are going to adopt a package, retitle its bug to replace ‘RFA’ with ‘ITA’, in order for other people to know the package is being adopted and to prevent its automatic removal from the archive, and set yourself as the owner of the bug. To actually adopt the package, upload it with your name in its Maintainer: field, and close this bug once the package has been installed. Anyway, you or Ionut can maintain this package. I don't care. Thanks. -- Li Daobing signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#327018: [RFS] grace6: An XY plotting tool
Re: Torsten Werner in [EMAIL PROTECTED] DO NOT DO THAT AGAIN! RFH does not mean, that the package is not maintained. You should have coordinated the upload with the current maintainer - at least the ITA mail should be send some days/weeks *before* the upload. It would have helped if you had filed one common RFA(H?) for grace and grace6 together, or at least have mentioned a cross-ref somewhere. Ionut is the future maintainer who has coordinated with me. Ionut, please send your own ITA mail to the bug report mentioned above. We will discuss privately how to fix the problem. I'm sorry if I broke transition plans there. Christoph -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#327018: [RFS] grace6: An XY plotting tool
Package: grace6 Severity: grave Version: 5.99.0+final-7 Christoph Berg schrieb: Re: Li Daobing in [EMAIL PROTECTED] I want to adopt grace6[1]. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/307358 I rebuild grace6[2], lintian and linda clean. I have upload it to mentors.debian.net[3]. Hi, the package looks fine. Uploaded. A minor nit: update the maintainer name in debian/copyright for the next upload. Christoph Hello, DO NOT DO THAT AGAIN! RFH does not mean, that the package is not maintained. You should have coordinated the upload with the current maintainer - at least the ITA mail should be send some days/weeks *before* the upload. Ionut is the future maintainer who has coordinated with me. Ionut, please send your own ITA mail to the bug report mentioned above. We will discuss privately how to fix the problem. Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
