Bug#329189: tetex-base: dvips -Poutline not using .pfb fonts

2005-10-11 Thread Florent Rougon
Arne Ahrend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 By the way, is anybody else able to reproduce this issue by installing
 the tetex-{base,bin,extra} packages separately one after the other?

Yes. The bug is in tetex-extra.postinst. Insert mktexlsr just before the
'if updmap 2...' and everything will work as expected.

Here is what happens:
  - with 'apt-get install tetex-extra', tetex-extra is unpacked before
tetex-base and tetex-bin are configured, and one of them calls
mktexlsr, which results in the map files from tetex-extra being
found when tetex-extra.postinst later calls updmap.
   - correct psfonts_t1.map
  - with 'apt-get install tetex-bin ; apt-get install tetex-extra',
the mktexlsr run by tetex-bin or tetex-base (maybe both) cannot find
tetex-extra's map files since tetex-extra is not even unpacked.
And tetex-extra.postinst doesn't run mktexlsr before updmap,
therefore updmap cannot find these map files.
   - incomplete psfonts_t1.map
  - when you run 'tetex-extra.postinst configure' afterwards, the
map files are found by updmap this time because the previous run
updated the ls-R files (updmap calls texhash, i.e. mktexlsr, at the
end of its operation by default, since it creates map files).
   - correct psfonts_t1.map

Nasty bug. :-/

-- 
Florent


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#329189: tetex-base: dvips -Poutline not using .pfb fonts

2005-10-11 Thread Frank Küster
severity 329189 important
reassign 329189 tetex-extra
retitle 329189 tetex-extra's Type1 fonts don't work when it is installed after 
tetex-bin
thanks



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#329189: tetex-base: dvips -Poutline not using .pfb fonts

2005-10-10 Thread Arne Ahrend
On Sun, 09 Oct 2005 19:16:39 +0200
Florent Rougon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  --- tetex-extra.updmap.err  2005-10-08 17:21:28.0 +0200
  +++ tetex-extra.updmap.err-with-x-in-updmap 2005-10-08 
  17:22:08.0 +0200
 
  --rw-r--r--  1 root root 33657 2005-10-08 00:28 psfonts_t1.map
 
 [...]
 
  +-rw-r--r--  1 root root 33657 2005-10-08 00:56 psfonts_t1.map
 
 It seems you got the same files here. Previously, your successful setup
 generated a bigger psfonts_t1.map (46 Ko or so). Are you sure you diffed
 the right files?

That was well spotted. No, I messed up there, sorry.
I am also confident that I was inadvertently using the apt-get call
sequence which avoids the bug and just credited that to /bin/sh /usr/bin/updmap 

 

2. Check whether running the 'tetex-extra.postinst configure' in
   either setup several times in a row always gives the same result.

Oops, I blindly copied that from one of the mails without the configure 
argument.
With that argument it does indeed fix the bug, here is the output of
sh -x /var/lib/dpkg/info/tetex-extra.postinst configure  
/tmp/tetex-extra-postinst.lg 21
The four dpkg logs (texinfo, tetex_{base,bin,extra} leading up to the bug are 
included further down.

This is the psfonts_t1.map file prior to and after the extra run of postinst:
-rw-r--r--  1 root root 33657 Oct 10 20:05 
/var/lib/texmf/dvips/config/psfonts_t1.map
-rw-r--r--  1 root root 45279 Oct 10 20:11 
/var/lib/texmf/dvips/config/psfonts_t1.map

+ set -e
+ PATH=/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin/X11
+ envvars='
AFMFONTS BIBINPUTS BSTINPUTS DVILJFONTS DVIPSFONTS DVIPSHEADERS GFFONTS
GLYPHFONTS INDEXSTYLE MFBASES MFINPUTS MFPOOL MFTINPUTS MPINPUTS MPMEMS
MPPOOL MPSUPPORT OCPINPUTS OFMFONTS OPLFONTS OTPINPUTS OVFFONTS OVPFONTS
PKFONTS PSHEADERS T1FONTS T1INPUTS TEXBIB TEXCONFIG TEXDOCS TEXFONTMAPS
TEXFONTS TEXFORMATS TEXINDEXSTYLE TEXINPUTS TEXMFCNF TEXMFDBS TEXMFINI
TEXPICTS TEXPKS TEXPOOL TEXPSHEADERS TEXSOURCES TFMFONTS TRFONTS VFFONTS
XDVIFONTS XDVIVFS TEXMF TETEXDIR
'
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset AFMFONTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset BIBINPUTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset BSTINPUTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset DVILJFONTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset DVIPSFONTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset DVIPSHEADERS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset GFFONTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset GLYPHFONTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset INDEXSTYLE
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset MFBASES
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset MFINPUTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset MFPOOL
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset MFTINPUTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset MPINPUTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset MPMEMS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset MPPOOL
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset MPSUPPORT
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset OCPINPUTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset OFMFONTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset OPLFONTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset OTPINPUTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset OVFFONTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset OVPFONTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset PKFONTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset PSHEADERS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset T1FONTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset T1INPUTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TEXBIB
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TEXCONFIG
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TEXDOCS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TEXFONTMAPS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TEXFONTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TEXFORMATS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TEXINDEXSTYLE
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TEXINPUTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TEXMFCNF
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TEXMFDBS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TEXMFINI
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TEXPICTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TEXPKS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TEXPOOL
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TEXPSHEADERS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TEXSOURCES
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TFMFONTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TRFONTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset VFFONTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset XDVIFONTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset XDVIVFS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TEXMF
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TETEXDIR
+ VUMAPC=/var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg
+ MKTMPDIR=/tmp
+ TEXINIT_P=/usr/bin/fmtutil
+ umask 022
+ . /usr/share/debconf/confmodule
++ '[' '!' '' ']'
++ PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1
++ export PERL_DL_NONLAZY
++ exec /usr/share/debconf/frontend /var/lib/dpkg/info/tetex-extra.postinst 
configure
Running initex. This may take some time. ...
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/lambda.oft installed.
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/omega.oft installed.
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/amstex.fmt installed.
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/metafun.mem installed.
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/mpost.mem installed.
Running updmap. This may take some time. ...



texinfo-dpkg.log

Selecting previously deselected package texinfo.
(Reading database ... 51308 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking texinfo (from .../texinfo_4.7-2.2_amd64.deb) ...
Setting up texinfo (4.7-2.2) ...


tetex-base-dpkg.log
===
Selecting previously deselected package tetex-base.
(Reading 

Bug#329189: tetex-base: dvips -Poutline not using .pfb fonts

2005-10-10 Thread Arne Ahrend
I forgot to include the log file of the single apt-get install tetex-extra run.

tetex-extra-apt.log
===
Reading Package Lists...
Building Dependency Tree...
The following extra packages will be installed:
  tetex-base tetex-bin texinfo
Suggested packages:
  xpdf-reader pdf-viewer chktex lacheck rubber
Recommended packages:
  tetex-doc dialog texi2html perl-tk
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  tetex-base tetex-bin tetex-extra texinfo
0 upgraded, 4 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B/29.9MB of archives.
After unpacking 107MB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n] Preconfiguring packages ...
Selecting previously deselected package texinfo.
(Reading database ... 51308 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking texinfo (from .../texinfo_4.7-2.2_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package tetex-base.
Unpacking tetex-base (from .../tetex-base_2.0.2c-8_all.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package tetex-bin.
Unpacking tetex-bin (from .../tetex-bin_2.0.2-31_amd64.deb) ...

USING /root/control-overrides/tetex-extra_2.0.2c-8_all.deb/

Selecting previously deselected package tetex-extra.
Unpacking tetex-extra (from .../tetex-extra_2.0.2c-8_all.deb) ...
Setting up texinfo (4.7-2.2) ...

Setting up tetex-base (2.0.2c-8) ...

Creating config file /etc/texmf/mktex.cnf with new version

Creating config file /etc/texmf/dvips/config.builtin35 with new version

Creating config file /etc/texmf/updmap.d/00updmap.cfg with new version

Creating config file /etc/texmf/dvipdfm/config with new version

Creating config file /etc/texdoctk/texdocrc with new version

Setting up tetex-bin (2.0.2-31) ...

Creating config file /etc/texmf/texmf.d/05TeXMF.cnf with new version

Creating config file /etc/texmf/texmf.d/15Plain.cnf with new version

Creating config file /etc/texmf/texmf.d/45TeXinputs.cnf with new version

Creating config file /etc/texmf/texmf.d/55Fonts.cnf with new version

Creating config file /etc/texmf/texmf.d/65BibTeX.cnf with new version

Creating config file /etc/texmf/texmf.d/75DviPS.cnf with new version

Creating config file /etc/texmf/texmf.d/85Misc.cnf with new version

Creating config file /etc/texmf/texmf.d/90TeXDoc.cnf with new version

Creating config file /etc/texmf/texmf.d/95NonPath.cnf with new version
Generating /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf ... 
Creating config file /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf with new version
done
Generating /var/lib/texmf/web2c/fmtutil.cnf ... done
Regenerating /var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg ... done
Running initex. This may take some time. ...
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/lambda.oft installed.
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/omega.oft installed.
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/amstex.fmt installed.
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/latex.fmt installed.
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/pdflatex.fmt installed.
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/pdftex.fmt installed.
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/tex.fmt installed.
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/cont-en.efmt installed.
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/elatex.efmt installed.
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/etex.efmt installed.
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/latex.efmt installed.
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/mptopdf.efmt installed.
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/pdfelatex.efmt installed.
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/pdfetex.efmt installed.
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/pdflatex.efmt installed.
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/metafun.mem installed.
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/mpost.mem installed.
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/mf.base installed.
Running updmap. This may take some time. ...


If you want to change the default settings,
use /usr/bin/texconfig to configure teTeX.

Fixing permissions and group of ls-R as specified by debconf ...
mode of `/var/lib/texmf/ls-R' changed to 0664 (rw-rw-r--)
mode of `/var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXMFMAIN' changed to 0664 (rw-rw-r--)
mode of `/var/cache/fonts/ls-R' changed to 0664 (rw-rw-r--)
changed group of `/var/lib/texmf/ls-R' to users
changed group of `/var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXMFMAIN' to users
changed group of `/var/cache/fonts/ls-R' to users

Setting up tetex-extra (2.0.2c-8) ...

Creating config file /etc/texmf/dvips/config.ams with new version

Creating config file /etc/texmf/dvips/config.cm with new version

Creating config file /etc/texmf/dvips/config.amz with new version

Creating config file /etc/texmf/dvips/config.cmz with new version
Running initex. This may take some time. ...
Running fmtutil succeeded.
Updmap found in PATH: /usr/bin/updmap
Running updmap. This may take some time. ...
Running updmap succeeded.


Regards,

Arne


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#329189: tetex-base: dvips -Poutline not using .pfb fonts

2005-10-09 Thread Florent Rougon
Thanks for the detailed info.

Arne Ahrend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I have the impression that I should no longer call this a tetex bug.
 Calling an executable shell script FILE starting with #!/bin/sh should
 be equivalent to calling /bin/sh FILE (and afaIk the latter is exactly
 what the kernel does in this case).

Yes.

 Replacing the PIDs (10453 and 28306) in the updmap STDERR logs I
 provided last night with X the diff shrinks down to

Good idea.

 --- tetex-extra.updmap.err  2005-10-08 17:21:28.0 +0200
 +++ tetex-extra.updmap.err-with-x-in-updmap 2005-10-08 17:22:08.0 
 +0200

 --rw-r--r--  1 root root 33657 2005-10-08 00:28 psfonts_t1.map

[...]

 +-rw-r--r--  1 root root 33657 2005-10-08 00:56 psfonts_t1.map

It seems you got the same files here. Previously, your successful setup
generated a bigger psfonts_t1.map (46 Ko or so). Are you sure you diffed
the right files?

 I assume these are the essential differences between /bin/sh -x
 /usr/bin/updmap and updmap (modified to have -x on line one in
 /usr/bin/updmap), the different invocations apparently cause certain
 cat commands to move by a few lines.

I think the different order has nothing do to with how you called
updmap. If you look closely at the two places where you had different
orders between the two runs, you'll see that every time, the commands
whose order is swapped are elements of a pipeline. They are not started
exactly at the same time, but run simultaneously afterwards.

   2. Check whether running the 'tetex-extra.postinst configure' in
  either setup several times in a row always gives the same result.

 After reproducing the bug several invocations of 
   sh -x /var/lib/dpkg/info/tetex-extra.postinst  
 /tmp/tetex-extra-postinst.lg 21 
 do not repair it.

Ah, but you forgot to pass 'configure' as the first parameter to
tetex-extra.postinst. Without it, updmap is not run and it is no wonder
why this doesn't fix anything.

 /usr/bin/which updmap gives
 /usr/bin/updmap

Good.

 Output of apt-get install tetex-extra:
 ==

[...]

 Running fmtutil succeeded.
 Updmap found in PATH: /usr/bin/updmap

Good.

 Running updmap. This may take some time. ...
 Running updmap succeeded.

OK.

 Exporting the PATH in postint and/or in /usr/bin/updmap does not
 change behaviour. And we know that invoking updmap as /bin/sh
 /usr/bin/updmap works around the bug.

Yes (but so strange that I still doubt it can be true!). I just wanted
to be really sure it wasn't a PATH issue. :-)

 lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root 4 2005-09-18 14:56 /bin/sh - bash

 I have also changed the link to dash, but that had no impact;
 everything seems to work as always with dash as well and it reproduced
 the bug. Same goes for replacing the link with a copy of bash. (I have
 of course changed it back to a link to bash afterwards.)

OK.

-- 
Florent


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#329189: tetex-base: dvips -Poutline not using .pfb fonts

2005-10-09 Thread Florent Rougon
Arne Ahrend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Starting after 
   dpkg --purge tetex-{base,bin,extra} texinfo
 it makes a difference whether I do
apt-get install tetex-bin ; apt-get install tetex-extra
   (this reproduces the bug)
 or just
   apt-get install tetex-extra
 and let it pull in all the others (this does NOT reproduce the bug).

Interesting (presumably this has nothing to do with the /bin/sh thing,
which is reassuring). The installation log (dpkg's messages) would be
even more interesting.

Maybe the unpack order can make font files appear in an unexpected place
if a package installs a symlink /path/to/foo and another package that is
unpacked later installs files such as /path/to/foo/bar/baz. But I think
the opposite order would give a dpkg error (trying to overwrite ...),
so I doubt it can be the explanation (and that would probably have been
noticed earlier). Just what comes to mind from what you described...

-- 
Florent


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#329189: tetex-base: dvips -Poutline not using .pfb fonts

2005-10-08 Thread Florent Rougon
Hi,

Let me make sure I understand what you are saying:

  Simply changing the line 'if updmap 2 $tempfile; then' into
  'if /bin/sh /usr/bin/updmap 2 $tempfile; then' in
  tetex-extra.postinst and running 'tetex-extra.postinst configure'
  gives you a different (more complete) psfonts_t1.map than running that
  command without the change?

If so, presumably both ways run a different updmap program. Quite
strange, but if only this change does what you say, I cannot see any
other cause (this is very surprising because the first thing
tetex-extra.postinst does is set a sane PATH; it doesn't export it,
though, but that cannot explain why the 'updmap' and
'/bin/sh /usr/bin/updmap' calls give different results here).

Could you please:

  1. Confirm the emphasized paragraph above.
  2. Check whether running the 'tetex-extra.postinst configure' in
 either setup several times in a row always gives the same result.
  3. Tell us what you obtain from '/usr/bin/which updmap' (as root).
 Check also in the script: insert

echo Updmap found: $(/usr/bin/which updmap)

 just before the if...fi block that calls updmap.
  4. Try the failing case with 'export PATH=...' instead of 'PATH=...',
 to see if it works better (this will affect PATH searching in
 updmap itself and in the other programs run from the postinst
 script).
  5. Tell us what 'ls -l /bin/sh' says.

-- 
Florent


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#329189: tetex-base: dvips -Poutline not using .pfb fonts

2005-10-08 Thread Arne Ahrend
On Sat, 08 Oct 2005 14:43:01 +0200
Florent Rougon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Let me make sure I understand what you are saying:
 
   Simply changing the line 'if updmap 2 $tempfile; then' into
   'if /bin/sh /usr/bin/updmap 2 $tempfile; then' in
   tetex-extra.postinst and running 'tetex-extra.postinst configure'
   gives you a different (more complete) psfonts_t1.map than running that
   command without the change?

Yes.

Well, I did not run 'tetex-extra.postinst configure' separately, but
at Franks suggestion plunged in a modfied postinst script[1] to apt-get install.

I have the impression that I should no longer call this a tetex bug. Calling
an executable shell script FILE starting with #!/bin/sh should be equivalent to 
calling
/bin/sh FILE (and afaIk the latter is exactly what the kernel does in this 
case). 

By the way, my i386 installation also shows the bug, and a manual run of updmap 
helps there, too.
(I must unknowingly have repaired the psfonts_t1.map file by an updmap call 
over the years.)

Replacing the PIDs (10453 and 28306) in the updmap STDERR logs I provided last 
night with X the diff
shrinks down to

--- tetex-extra.updmap.err  2005-10-08 17:21:28.0 +0200
+++ tetex-extra.updmap.err-with-x-in-updmap 2005-10-08 17:22:08.0 
+0200
@@ -87,9 +87,9 @@
 ++ tail -1
 + dvipsPreferOutline=true
 ++ cfgval dvipsDownloadBase35
+++ cat /var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg
 ++ sed -n 's/^dvipsDownloadBase35[  =][ =]*//p'
 ++ tail -1
-++ cat /var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg
 + dvipsDownloadBase35=false
 ++ cfgval pdftexDownloadBase14
 ++ cat /var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg
@@ -749,9 +749,9 @@
 + transLW35 /usr/share/texmf/dvips/tetex/pdftex35.map
 + case $mode in
 + cat /usr/share/texmf/dvips/tetex/pdftex35.map
-+ cat /tmp/updmap.X/a /tmp/updmap.X/b
 + egrep -v '(^%|PaintType)'
 + grep .
++ cat /tmp/updmap.X/a /tmp/updmap.X/b
 + transLW35 /usr/share/texmf/dvips/tetex/dvipdfm35.map
 + case $mode in
 + cat /usr/share/texmf/dvips/tetex/dvipdfm35.map
@@ -832,18 +832,18 @@
 + true
 + cd /var/lib/texmf/dvips/config
 + ls -l dvipdfm.map dvipdfm_dl14.map dvipdfm_ndl14.map pdftex.map 
pdftex_dl14.map pdftex_ndl14.map ps2pk.map psfonts.map psfonts_pk.map 
psfonts_t1.map builtin35.map download35.map
--rw-r--r--  1 root root  8985 2005-10-08 00:28 builtin35.map
--rw-r--r--  1 root root 13102 2005-10-08 00:28 download35.map
--rw-r--r--  1 root root 10500 2005-10-08 00:28 dvipdfm_dl14.map
-lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root17 2005-10-08 00:28 dvipdfm.map - dvipdfm_ndl14.map
--rw-r--r--  1 root root 11127 2005-10-08 00:28 dvipdfm_ndl14.map
--rw-r--r--  1 root root 36801 2005-10-08 00:28 pdftex_dl14.map
-lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root16 2005-10-08 00:28 pdftex.map - pdftex_ndl14.map
--rw-r--r--  1 root root 35227 2005-10-08 00:28 pdftex_ndl14.map
--rw-r--r--  1 root root 37768 2005-10-08 00:28 ps2pk.map
-lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root14 2005-10-08 00:28 psfonts.map - psfonts_t1.map
--rw-r--r--  1 root root 25532 2005-10-08 00:28 psfonts_pk.map
--rw-r--r--  1 root root 33657 2005-10-08 00:28 psfonts_t1.map
+-rw-r--r--  1 root root  8985 2005-10-08 00:56 builtin35.map
+-rw-r--r--  1 root root 13102 2005-10-08 00:56 download35.map
+-rw-r--r--  1 root root 10500 2005-10-08 00:56 dvipdfm_dl14.map
+lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root17 2005-10-08 00:56 dvipdfm.map - dvipdfm_ndl14.map
+-rw-r--r--  1 root root 11127 2005-10-08 00:56 dvipdfm_ndl14.map
+-rw-r--r--  1 root root 36801 2005-10-08 00:56 pdftex_dl14.map
+lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root16 2005-10-08 00:56 pdftex.map - pdftex_ndl14.map
+-rw-r--r--  1 root root 35227 2005-10-08 00:56 pdftex_ndl14.map
+-rw-r--r--  1 root root 37768 2005-10-08 00:56 ps2pk.map
+lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root14 2005-10-08 00:56 psfonts.map - psfonts_t1.map
+-rw-r--r--  1 root root 25532 2005-10-08 00:56 psfonts_pk.map
+-rw-r--r--  1 root root 33657 2005-10-08 00:56 psfonts_t1.map
 + verboseMsg
 + true
 + echo

I assume these are the essential differences between /bin/sh -x /usr/bin/updmap
and updmap (modified to have -x on line one in /usr/bin/updmap), the different
invocations apparently cause certain cat commands to move by a few lines.


 If so, presumably both ways run a different updmap program. Quite
 strange, but if only this change does what you say, I cannot see any
 other cause (this is very surprising because the first thing
 tetex-extra.postinst does is set a sane PATH; it doesn't export it,
 though, but that cannot explain why the 'updmap' and
 '/bin/sh /usr/bin/updmap' calls give different results here).

I added -x to the first line of /usr/bin/updmap to get verbose mode and
reproduce the bug at the same time, so it was _that_ updmap and no other.
But I have retested it with an
echo Updmap found in PATH: $(/usr/bin/which updmap)
line in postinst and got confirmation, see below.



   2. Check whether running the 'tetex-extra.postinst configure' in
  either setup several times in a row always gives the same result.

After reproducing the bug 

Bug#329189: tetex-base: dvips -Poutline not using .pfb fonts

2005-10-08 Thread Arne Ahrend
On Sat, 8 Oct 2005 19:00:24 +0200
Arne Ahrend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Sat, 08 Oct 2005 14:43:01 +0200
 Florent Rougon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Let me make sure I understand what you are saying:
  
Simply changing the line 'if updmap 2 $tempfile; then' into
'if /bin/sh /usr/bin/updmap 2 $tempfile; then' in
tetex-extra.postinst and running 'tetex-extra.postinst configure'
gives you a different (more complete) psfonts_t1.map than running that
command without the change?
 
 Yes.

I have made one further observation without manipulating postinst:

Starting after 
dpkg --purge tetex-{base,bin,extra} texinfo
it makes a difference whether I do
 apt-get install tetex-bin ; apt-get install tetex-extra
(this reproduces the bug)
or just
apt-get install tetex-extra
and let it pull in all the others (this does NOT reproduce the bug).

Cheers,

Arne



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#329189: tetex-base: dvips -Poutline not using .pfb fonts

2005-10-07 Thread Frank Küster
Arne Ahrend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I have purged tetex-{base,bin,extra} again and manually removed
 /usr/share/texmf and /etc/texmf/. Apologies for overlooking them so far.

You shouldn't have done that.  These directories are under dpkg's
control, and there are a couple of packages that put files there but do
not depend on tetex-* (either because they just Recommend or Suggest it,
or in one case, texinfo, because (currently) tetex-base depends on it).
You should do 

dpkg -S usr/share/texmf/ | egrep -v 'tetex-base|tetex-bin|tetex-extra' | cut -d 
':' -f 1 | sort -u

and then for each package this lists:

apt-get --reinstall install package

 After reinstalling tetex-{base,bin} the spurious
 /usr/share/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg file did _not_ reappear. 

That I knew.  There must have been a bug in some old version that
existed months ago.  So for your system all is well; but I think we'll
have to find a way to remove fmtutil.cnf and updmap.cfg from
TEXMFMAIN/web2c if we find them there.  To all, are there more files I
should care for?

Regards, Frank
-- 
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer




Bug#329189: tetex-base: dvips -Poutline not using .pfb fonts

2005-10-07 Thread Arne Ahrend
On Fri, 07 Oct 2005 13:28:42 +0200
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 dpkg -S usr/share/texmf/ | egrep -v 'tetex-base|tetex-bin|tetex-extra' | cut 
 -d ':' -f 1 | sort -u
 
 and then for each package this lists:
 
 apt-get --reinstall install package

Thanks for pointing that out. Indeed I needed to reinstall texinfo.


Kind regards,

Arne



Bug#329189: tetex-base: dvips -Poutline not using .pfb fonts

2005-10-07 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 06.10.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 Arne Ahrend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi,

  I have also useed find to seek for updmap.* files.
  /var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg
  /usr/share/man/man1/updmap.1.gz
  /usr/share/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg
  /usr/share/tetex-base/updmap.cfg
 
  dlocate does not seem to care for
  usr/share/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg.
 
 That one shouldn't be there.  We've had this two times before in
 the last couple of weeks, but unfortunately never found out why
 these files are there.
 
 I think, nevertheless, that we should just assume that they are
 there on some systems, and care for them (i.e. delete them).
 
As dlocate does not find it it was not brought in by dpkg but was
rather generated. In the moment I don't remember if the user can
deselect to generate that file. If not (and the generated file should
actually sit in /var/lib/texmf/web2c/) this is a file from an old
installation.
I guess we should simply remove it. As the submitter already purged
the old installation we can't do dig further into this.

Arne is it to close this bug then?

Regards,
  Hilmar
-- 
sigmentation fault


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#329189: tetex-base: dvips -Poutline not using .pfb fonts

2005-10-07 Thread Arne Ahrend

On Fri, 7 Oct 2005 21:01:36 +0200
Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I guess we should simply remove it. As the submitter already purged
 the old installation we can't do dig further into this.
 
 Arne is it to close this bug then?

As I see it the status is:

1) I cannot reproduce the spurious /usr/share/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg
   and this file is now gone (for me).
2) I still have to run updmap once by hand after installing tetex-extra
   to cause dvips -Pwww or -Poutline to use the .pfb fonts.

So from a personal perspective the little original problem is still there.

However, as tetex 3.0 is destined to enter unstable really soon now[1], it is 
probably
best to focus efforts on that release. If the Debian maintainer(s) of tetex
feel that we have made best use of my report, then certainly the bug should be 
closed.

Kind regards and many thanks,

Arne


[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/09/msg00015.html





___
SMS schreiben mit WEB.DE FreeMail - einfach, schnell und
kostenguenstig. Jetzt gleich testen! http://f.web.de/?mc=021192



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#329189: tetex-base: dvips -Poutline not using .pfb fonts

2005-10-07 Thread Frank Küster
Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 As dlocate does not find it it was not brought in by dpkg but was
 rather generated. 

You forgot that we once had a symlink /usr/share/texmf/web2c -
/var/lib/texmf/web2c.  It might be that some intermediate buggy version,
alone or together with a user messing things up, caused these files to
show up there.  Or some buggy installation script of whatever. 

 I guess we should simply remove it. As the submitter already purged
 the old installation we can't do dig further into this.

There were some old bug reports or discussions on the list where people
sent a listing of the directory.  I don't recall what was in there - but
essentially we can and should check fmtutil.cnf, updmap.cfg, *.log, and
all format files (*.fmt, *.efmt, *.oft et al)

Regards, Frank
-- 
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer




Bug#329189: tetex-base: dvips -Poutline not using .pfb fonts

2005-10-07 Thread Frank Küster
Arne Ahrend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 2) I still have to run updmap once by hand after installing tetex-extra
to cause dvips -Pwww or -Poutline to use the .pfb fonts.

Oh.  That is unexpected.  I think we should debug this, and for this we
need the stderr of updmap run with sh -x.  I don't have time to give
any help in that, but if you or somebody else wants to find out: Go to
http://lists.debian.org/search.html and search for apt-extracttemplates
control-overrides in debian-devel.  One of the mails is by me, I'm
answering to a mail that describes how to use changed postinst scripts
locally for testing.  

 However, as tetex 3.0 is destined to enter unstable really soon now[1], it is 
 probably
 best to focus efforts on that release. If the Debian maintainer(s) of tetex
 feel that we have made best use of my report, then certainly the bug should 
 be closed.

Well, either it is a real bug - then it might be still present in the
packaging of 3.0.  Or it is a misconfiguration on your side - then it is
possible that others have the same problem, and we should at least think
about documenting it.  If not working around it.

Regards, Frank
-- 
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer




Bug#329189: tetex-base: dvips -Poutline not using .pfb fonts

2005-10-06 Thread Ralf Stubner
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 19:01 +0200, Arne Ahrend wrote:

 Here is tetex-extra-apt.log
 ===
 Reading Package Lists...
 Building Dependency Tree...
 The following NEW packages will be installed:
   tetex-extra
 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
 Need to get 0B/10.5MB of archives.
 After unpacking 40.1MB of additional disk space will be used.
 Selecting previously deselected package tetex-extra.
 (Reading database ... 57352 files and directories currently installed.)
 Unpacking tetex-extra (from .../tetex-extra_2.0.2c-8_all.deb) ...
 Setting up tetex-extra (2.0.2c-8) ...
 
 Creating config file /etc/texmf/dvips/config.ams with new version
 
 Creating config file /etc/texmf/dvips/config.cm with new version
 
 Creating config file /etc/texmf/dvips/config.amz with new version
 
 Creating config file /etc/texmf/dvips/config.cmz with new version
 Running initex. This may take some time. ...
 Running updmap. This may take some time. ...
 using config file /var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg
 using output directory /var/lib/texmf/dvips/config
 
 Scanning for LW35 support files
 
 Scanning for MixedMap entries:
 
 Scanning for Map entries:
 
 
 Files generated in /var/lib/texmf/dvips/config:

I don't know the postinst scripts of the teTeX 2 packages all that well,
but I am wondering why there is no indication of update-updmap actually
running. Although update-updmap must have run at some point, otherwise a
manual updmap wouldn't have produced a correct map file.

cheerio
ralf


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#329189: tetex-base: dvips -Poutline not using .pfb fonts

2005-10-06 Thread Frank Küster
Arne Ahrend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Wed, 05 Oct 2005 15:16:30 +0200
 Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 This shows that updmap is in fact executed, but it seems that it does
 not do the right thing.  However, it should save a detailed log of its
 actions in /var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.log.  Can you please make repeat
 the test above so that it leads to the error, installing tetex-base and
 tetex-bin first.  Then, before installing tetex-extra, please do the
 following:
 
 - remove /var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.log just to make sure we get the
   right one

 Hmm, this file is not there and it does not get created...

Uh, that might point to the actual reason: It might be that the updmap
run from the postinst creates its files at a different place. What is
still unclear is why it does so.  Could it be that you use different
methods of gaining root rights for installing packages on the one hand,
and for manually running updmap on the other?

  Do you have dlocate installed?  If yes, please send us the output of

dlocate updmap.log
dlocate updmap.cfg

Furthermore, please send us the output of the following commands:

kpsewhich --expand-var='$VARTEXMF'
kpsewhich --expand-var='$TEXMF'

Please execute them after getting root rights the same way you do it for
apt-get (or both ways if there are two different ones).

 I also changed the verboseMsg() { $verbose  echo ${1+$@} ; } by removing 
 the
 redirection to STDERR, since the the /var/lib/dpkg/info/tetex-extra.postinst 
 script
 redirects STDERR into a file which it deletes immediately.

Oh, yes, I forgot this.  If the output of the commands above doesn't
help us, we'll have to do more complicated things to get the postinst
changed. 

Regards, Frank
-- 
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer




Bug#329189: tetex-base: dvips -Poutline not using .pfb fonts

2005-10-06 Thread Frank Küster
Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I don't know the postinst scripts of the teTeX 2 packages all that well,
 but I am wondering why there is no indication of update-updmap actually
 running. Although update-updmap must have run at some point, otherwise a
 manual updmap wouldn't have produced a correct map file.

It is not run at all, but that is no problem:  In 2.0.2, the behavior of
updmap is different when it cannot find a map file - it just skips it.
Therefore it was possible to keep all map entries in 00updmap.cfg that was
provided by tetex-base.  Only updmap needs to be run, it will (or
should) find the newly installed map files and create the corresponding
entries in psfonts_t1.map and all the others.

Regards, Frank
-- 
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer




Bug#329189: tetex-base: dvips -Poutline not using .pfb fonts

2005-10-06 Thread Arne Ahrend
On Thu, 06 Oct 2005 12:00:19 +0200
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   Do you have dlocate installed?  If yes, please send us the output of

Not until now :-

 dlocate updmap.log
(returns nothing)

 dlocate updmap.cfg
tetex-base: /usr/share/tetex-base/updmap.cfg
tetex-base: /usr/share/tetex-base/00updmap.cfg


I have also useed find to seek for updmap.* files.
/var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg
/usr/share/man/man1/updmap.1.gz
/usr/share/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg
/usr/share/tetex-base/updmap.cfg

dlocate does not seem to care for usr/share/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg.

 Furthermore, please send us the output of the following commands:
 
 kpsewhich --expand-var='$VARTEXMF'

/var/lib/texmf


 kpsewhich --expand-var='$TEXMF'

{/root/texmf,!!/usr/local/share/texmf,!!/usr/local/lib/texmf,!!/var/lib/texmf,!!/usr/share/texmf}

 
 Please execute them after getting root rights the same way you do it for
 apt-get (or both ways if there are two different ones).

It is always ssh -l root localhost save in very extreme circumstances.


Viele Grüße,

Arne




Bug#329189: tetex-base: dvips -Poutline not using .pfb fonts

2005-10-06 Thread Frank Küster
Arne Ahrend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I have also useed find to seek for updmap.* files.
 /var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg
 /usr/share/man/man1/updmap.1.gz
 /usr/share/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg
 /usr/share/tetex-base/updmap.cfg

 dlocate does not seem to care for usr/share/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg.

That one shouldn't be there.  We've had this two times before in the
last couple of weeks, but unfortunately never found out why these files
are there.

I think, nevertheless, that we should just assume that they are there on
some systems, and care for them (i.e. delete them).

 Furthermore, please send us the output of the following commands:
 
 kpsewhich --expand-var='$VARTEXMF'

 /var/lib/texmf

Correct

 kpsewhich --expand-var='$TEXMF'

 {/root/texmf,!!/usr/local/share/texmf,!!/usr/local/lib/texmf,!!/var/lib/texmf,!!/usr/share/texmf}

Also correct. Does anybody recall from the older bug reports why, in
these cases, the files in /usr/share/texmf/web2c took precedence over
the ones in /var/lib/texmf?

Regards, Frank
-- 
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer




Bug#329189: tetex-base: dvips -Poutline not using .pfb fonts

2005-10-06 Thread Arne Ahrend
On Thu, 06 Oct 2005 18:35:17 +0200
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Arne Ahrend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  dlocate does not seem to care for usr/share/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg.
 
 That one shouldn't be there.  We've had this two times before in the
 last couple of weeks, but unfortunately never found out why these files
 are there.
 
 I think, nevertheless, that we should just assume that they are there on
 some systems, and care for them (i.e. delete them).
 
  Does anybody recall from the older bug reports why, in
 these cases, the files in /usr/share/texmf/web2c took precedence over
 the ones in /var/lib/texmf?

I have purged tetex-{base,bin,extra} again and manually removed
/usr/share/texmf and /etc/texmf/. Apologies for overlooking them so far.

After reinstalling tetex-{base,bin} the spurious
/usr/share/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg file did _not_ reappear. Next
I installed tetex-extra which as usual reproduced the deficient
/var/lib/texmf/dvips/config/psfonts_t1.map file. The following
updmap.* files are now present:
/var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg
/usr/share/man/man1/updmap.1.gz
/usr/share/tetex-base/updmap.cfg


Ciao,
Arne



Bug#329189: tetex-base: dvips -Poutline not using .pfb fonts

2005-10-05 Thread Arne Ahrend
On Wed, 05 Oct 2005 15:16:30 +0200
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 This shows that updmap is in fact executed, but it seems that it does
 not do the right thing.  However, it should save a detailed log of its
 actions in /var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.log.  Can you please make repeat
 the test above so that it leads to the error, installing tetex-base and
 tetex-bin first.  Then, before installing tetex-extra, please do the
 following:
 
 - remove /var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.log just to make sure we get the
   right one

Hmm, this file is not there and it does not get created...

My updmap script has a line setting version=2.0 and the latest
change log entry is
# program history:
#   Mon Jan 27 22:38:44 CET 2003
#  don't call a function before processOptions; we may loose our
#  argument list with some broken shells




 - place a copy of /usr/bin/updmap in /usr/local/bin/ and edit the first
   line.  It is now
 
 #!/bin/sh
   
   edit it so that it reads
 
 #!/bin/sh -x
 
 
 After that, install tetex-extra, check that the problem in fact occured
 (i.e. that psfonts_t1.map is wrong) and send us the log of the
 installation and /var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.log.

I also changed the verboseMsg() { $verbose  echo ${1+$@} ; } by removing the
redirection to STDERR, since the the /var/lib/dpkg/info/tetex-extra.postinst 
script
redirects STDERR into a file which it deletes immediately.

After installing tetex-extra psfonts_t1.map is indeed wrong.

Kind regards,

Arne


Here is tetex-extra-apt.log
===
Reading Package Lists...
Building Dependency Tree...
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  tetex-extra
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B/10.5MB of archives.
After unpacking 40.1MB of additional disk space will be used.
Selecting previously deselected package tetex-extra.
(Reading database ... 57352 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking tetex-extra (from .../tetex-extra_2.0.2c-8_all.deb) ...
Setting up tetex-extra (2.0.2c-8) ...

Creating config file /etc/texmf/dvips/config.ams with new version

Creating config file /etc/texmf/dvips/config.cm with new version

Creating config file /etc/texmf/dvips/config.amz with new version

Creating config file /etc/texmf/dvips/config.cmz with new version
Running initex. This may take some time. ...
Running updmap. This may take some time. ...
using config file /var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg
using output directory /var/lib/texmf/dvips/config

Scanning for LW35 support files

Scanning for MixedMap entries:

Scanning for Map entries:


Files generated in /var/lib/texmf/dvips/config:






Bug#329189: tetex-base: dvips -Poutline not using .pfb fonts

2005-10-04 Thread Frank Küster
Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I am not sure if this helps debugging, but the fonts that where
 initially missing from psfonts_t1.map are the ones from bsr.map,
 bsr-interpolated.map, omega.map, xypic.map and eurosym.map. This are the
 map files (and fonts) provided by tetex-extra. I would expect 
 updmap to be called twice. Once during tetex-base configuration and once
 during tetex-extra configuration. This sounds as if update-updmap was
 executed during tetex-extra configuration, but not updmap itself.

That's a good observation.  Arne, can you please try to execute (as
root)

sh -x /var/lib/dpkg/info/tetex-extra.postinst  extra-postinst.lg 21 

and send us the resulting file extra-postinst.lg.

Regards, Frank
-- 
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer




Bug#329189: tetex-base: dvips -Poutline not using .pfb fonts

2005-10-04 Thread Arne Ahrend
On Tue, 04 Oct 2005 14:14:15 +0200
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 That's a good observation.  Arne, can you please try to execute (as
 root)
 
 sh -x /var/lib/dpkg/info/tetex-extra.postinst  extra-postinst.lg 21 
 
 and send us the resulting file extra-postinst.lg.

Here it is. As requested I have not passed any arguments, so the bottom part
of /var/lib/dpkg/info/tetex-extra.postinst is not reached.

Kind regards,

Arne Ahrend


+ set -e
+ PATH=/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin/X11
+ envvars='
AFMFONTS BIBINPUTS BSTINPUTS DVILJFONTS DVIPSFONTS DVIPSHEADERS GFFONTS
GLYPHFONTS INDEXSTYLE MFBASES MFINPUTS MFPOOL MFTINPUTS MPINPUTS MPMEMS
MPPOOL MPSUPPORT OCPINPUTS OFMFONTS OPLFONTS OTPINPUTS OVFFONTS OVPFONTS
PKFONTS PSHEADERS T1FONTS T1INPUTS TEXBIB TEXCONFIG TEXDOCS TEXFONTMAPS
TEXFONTS TEXFORMATS TEXINDEXSTYLE TEXINPUTS TEXMFCNF TEXMFDBS TEXMFINI
TEXPICTS TEXPKS TEXPOOL TEXPSHEADERS TEXSOURCES TFMFONTS TRFONTS VFFONTS
XDVIFONTS XDVIVFS TEXMF TETEXDIR
'
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset AFMFONTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset BIBINPUTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset BSTINPUTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset DVILJFONTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset DVIPSFONTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset DVIPSHEADERS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset GFFONTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset GLYPHFONTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset INDEXSTYLE
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset MFBASES
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset MFINPUTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset MFPOOL
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset MFTINPUTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset MPINPUTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset MPMEMS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset MPPOOL
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset MPSUPPORT
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset OCPINPUTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset OFMFONTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset OPLFONTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset OTPINPUTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset OVFFONTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset OVPFONTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset PKFONTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset PSHEADERS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset T1FONTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset T1INPUTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TEXBIB
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TEXCONFIG
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TEXDOCS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TEXFONTMAPS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TEXFONTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TEXFORMATS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TEXINDEXSTYLE
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TEXINPUTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TEXMFCNF
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TEXMFDBS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TEXMFINI
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TEXPICTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TEXPKS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TEXPOOL
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TEXPSHEADERS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TEXSOURCES
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TFMFONTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TRFONTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset VFFONTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset XDVIFONTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset XDVIVFS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TEXMF
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TETEXDIR
+ VUMAPC=/var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg
+ MKTMPDIR=/tmp
+ TEXINIT_P=/usr/bin/fmtutil
+ umask 022
+ . /usr/share/debconf/confmodule
++ '[' '!' '' ']'
++ PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1
++ export PERL_DL_NONLAZY
++ exec /usr/share/debconf/frontend /var/lib/dpkg/info/tetex-extra.postinst



Bug#329189: tetex-base: dvips -Poutline not using .pfb fonts

2005-10-04 Thread Frank Küster
Arne Ahrend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Tue, 04 Oct 2005 14:14:15 +0200
 Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 That's a good observation.  Arne, can you please try to execute (as
 root)
 
 sh -x /var/lib/dpkg/info/tetex-extra.postinst  extra-postinst.lg 21 
 
 and send us the resulting file extra-postinst.lg.

 Here it is. As requested I have not passed any arguments, so the bottom part
 of /var/lib/dpkg/info/tetex-extra.postinst is not reached.

Oh, sorry - that was not requested, but rather forgotten.  Of course
we need

sh -x /var/lib/dpkg/info/tetex-extra.postinst configure  extra-postinst.lg 
21 

(there's no check for the second argument).

TIA, Frank
-- 
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer




Bug#329189: tetex-base: dvips -Poutline not using .pfb fonts

2005-10-04 Thread Arne Ahrend
On Tue, 04 Oct 2005 18:50:05 +0200
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 sh -x /var/lib/dpkg/info/tetex-extra.postinst configure  extra-postinst.lg 
 21 

Voila. This dutifully runs updmap which in turn touches 
/var/lib/texmf/dvips/config/psfonts_t1.map,
but does not change it from the status after the manual run of updmap yesterday.

Just to make sure that synaptic is not responsible for messing up here I have 
again purged tetex-{base,bin,extra}
and captured the output of individually installing them back with apt-get. It 
claims to run
updmap, but consistently produces the faulty 
/var/lib/texmf/dvips/config/psfonts_t1.map file. I attach
the output of apt-get install tetex-extra  tetex-extra-apt.log 21 further 
down. When I then run the command
you suggested, psfonts_t1.map gets updated to the correct/desired content.

Cheers,
Arne




extra-postinst.lg
=
+ set -e
+ PATH=/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin/X11
+ envvars='
AFMFONTS BIBINPUTS BSTINPUTS DVILJFONTS DVIPSFONTS DVIPSHEADERS GFFONTS
GLYPHFONTS INDEXSTYLE MFBASES MFINPUTS MFPOOL MFTINPUTS MPINPUTS MPMEMS
MPPOOL MPSUPPORT OCPINPUTS OFMFONTS OPLFONTS OTPINPUTS OVFFONTS OVPFONTS
PKFONTS PSHEADERS T1FONTS T1INPUTS TEXBIB TEXCONFIG TEXDOCS TEXFONTMAPS
TEXFONTS TEXFORMATS TEXINDEXSTYLE TEXINPUTS TEXMFCNF TEXMFDBS TEXMFINI
TEXPICTS TEXPKS TEXPOOL TEXPSHEADERS TEXSOURCES TFMFONTS TRFONTS VFFONTS
XDVIFONTS XDVIVFS TEXMF TETEXDIR
'
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset AFMFONTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset BIBINPUTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset BSTINPUTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset DVILJFONTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset DVIPSFONTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset DVIPSHEADERS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset GFFONTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset GLYPHFONTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset INDEXSTYLE
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset MFBASES
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset MFINPUTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset MFPOOL
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset MFTINPUTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset MPINPUTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset MPMEMS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset MPPOOL
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset MPSUPPORT
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset OCPINPUTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset OFMFONTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset OPLFONTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset OTPINPUTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset OVFFONTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset OVPFONTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset PKFONTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset PSHEADERS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset T1FONTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset T1INPUTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TEXBIB
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TEXCONFIG
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TEXDOCS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TEXFONTMAPS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TEXFONTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TEXFORMATS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TEXINDEXSTYLE
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TEXINPUTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TEXMFCNF
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TEXMFDBS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TEXMFINI
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TEXPICTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TEXPKS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TEXPOOL
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TEXPSHEADERS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TEXSOURCES
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TFMFONTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TRFONTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset VFFONTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset XDVIFONTS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset XDVIVFS
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TEXMF
+ for i in '$envvars'
+ unset TETEXDIR
+ VUMAPC=/var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg
+ MKTMPDIR=/tmp
+ TEXINIT_P=/usr/bin/fmtutil
+ umask 022
+ . /usr/share/debconf/confmodule
++ '[' '!' '' ']'
++ PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1
++ export PERL_DL_NONLAZY
++ exec /usr/share/debconf/frontend /var/lib/dpkg/info/tetex-extra.postinst 
configure
Running initex. This may take some time. ...
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/lambda.oft installed.
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/omega.oft installed.
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/amstex.fmt installed.
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/metafun.mem installed.
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/mpost.mem installed.
Running updmap. This may take some time. ...


tetex-extra-apt.log
===
Reading Package Lists...
Building Dependency Tree...
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  tetex-extra
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B/10.5MB of archives.
After unpacking 40.1MB of additional disk space will be used.
Selecting previously deselected package tetex-extra.
(Reading database ... 57352 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking tetex-extra (from .../tetex-extra_2.0.2c-8_all.deb) ...
Setting up tetex-extra (2.0.2c-8) ...

Creating config file /etc/texmf/dvips/config.ams with new version

Creating config file /etc/texmf/dvips/config.cm with new version

Creating config file /etc/texmf/dvips/config.amz with new version

Creating config file /etc/texmf/dvips/config.cmz with new version
Running initex. This may take some time. ...
Running updmap. This may take some time. ...





Bug#329189: tetex-base: dvips -Poutline not using .pfb fonts

2005-10-03 Thread Arne Ahrend
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 13:03:42 +0200
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   You don't, by chance, have backups of the old psfonts_t1.map
 and/or of the updmap log file - either as
 /var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.log, or /tmp/updm*?  If you have some of
 these, please send them - but only the old ones that produced a buggy
 psfonts_t1.map is of any use.

I could not find any such log file and did not keep the original map file.
However, I am able to reproduce the problem by completely removing tetex-base,
tetex-bin and tetex-extra and reinstalling them.

Running of updmap is being reported during the installation,
but the resulting /var/lib/texmf/dvips/config/psfonts_t1.map
appears to match the one I had prior to reporting this issue.

Regards, Arne


Faulty /var/lib/texmf/dvips/config/psfonts_t1.map:

% psfonts_t1.map: maintained by the script updmap.
%   Don't change this file directly. Edit texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg
%   and run updmap to recreate this file.
antpb AntykwaPoltawskiego-Bold  encantp ReEncodeFont  antp.enc antpb.pfb
antpbi AntykwaPoltawskiego-BoldItalic  encantp ReEncodeFont  antp.enc 
antpbi.pfb
antpr AntykwaPoltawskiego-Regular  encantp ReEncodeFont  antp.enc antpr.pfb
antpri AntykwaPoltawskiego-Italic  encantp ReEncodeFont  antp.enc antpri.pfb
anttb AntykwaTorunska-Bold  enc-antt ReEncodeFont  antt.enc anttb.pfb
anttr AntykwaTorunska-Regular  enc-antt ReEncodeFont  antt.enc anttr.pfb
anttri AntykwaTorunska-Italic  enc-antt ReEncodeFont  antt.enc anttri.pfb
bchb8r CharterBT-Bold  TeXBase1Encoding ReEncodeFont  8r.enc bchb8a.pfb
bchbi8r CharterBT-BoldItalic  TeXBase1Encoding ReEncodeFont  8r.enc 
bchbi8a.pfb
bchbo8r CharterBT-Bold  .167 SlantFont TeXBase1Encoding ReEncodeFont  8r.enc 
bchb8a.pfb
bchr8r CharterBT-Roman  TeXBase1Encoding ReEncodeFont  8r.enc bchr8a.pfb
bchri8r CharterBT-Italic  TeXBase1Encoding ReEncodeFont  8r.enc bchri8a.pfb
bchro8r CharterBT-Roman  .167 SlantFont TeXBase1Encoding ReEncodeFont  
8r.enc bchr8a.pfb
cmcb10 cmcb10 cmcb10.pfb
cmcbx10 cmcbx10 cmcbx10.pfb
cmcbx12 cmcbx12 cmcbx12.pfb
cmcbx5 cmcbx5 cmcbx5.pfb
cmcbx6 cmcbx6 cmcbx6.pfb
cmcbx7 cmcbx7 cmcbx7.pfb
cmcbx8 cmcbx8 cmcbx8.pfb
cmcbx9 cmcbx9 cmcbx9.pfb
cmcbxsl10 cmcbxsl10 cmcbxsl1.pfb
cmcbxti10 cmcbxti10 cmcbxti1.pfb
cmccsc10 cmccsc10 cmccsc10.pfb
cmccsc8 cmccsc8 cmccsc8.pfb
cmccsc9 cmccsc9 cmccsc9.pfb
cmcinch cmcinch72 cmcinch7.pfb
cmcitt10 cmcitt10 cmcitt10.pfb
cmcsl10 cmcsl10 cmcsl10.pfb
cmcsl12 cmcsl12 cmcsl12.pfb
cmcsl8 cmcsl8 cmcsl8.pfb
cmcsl9 cmcsl9 cmcsl9.pfb
cmcsltt10 cmcsltt10 cmcsltt1.pfb
cmcss10 cmcss10 cmcss10.pfb
cmcss12 cmcss12 cmcss12.pfb
cmcss17 cmcss17 cmcss17.pfb
cmcss8 cmcss8 cmcss8.pfb
cmcss9 cmcss9 cmcss9.pfb
cmcssbx10 cmcssbx10 cmcssbx1.pfb
cmcssdc10 cmcssdc10 cmcssdc1.pfb
cmcssi10 cmcssi10 cmcssi10.pfb
cmcssi12 cmcssi12 cmcssi12.pfb
cmcssi17 cmcssi17 cmcssi17.pfb
cmcssi8 cmcssi8 cmcssi8.pfb
cmcssi9 cmcssi9 cmcssi9.pfb
cmcssq8 cmcssq8 cmcssq8.pfb
cmcssqi8 cmcssqi8 cmcssqi8.pfb
cmcti10 cmcti10 cmcti10.pfb
cmcti12 cmcti12 cmcti12.pfb
cmcti7 cmcti7 cmcti7.pfb
cmcti8 cmcti8 cmcti8.pfb
cmcti9 cmcti9 cmcti9.pfb
cmctt10 cmctt10 cmctt10.pfb
cmctt12 cmctt12 cmctt12.pfb
cmctt8 cmctt8 cmctt8.pfb
cmctt9 cmctt9 cmctt9.pfb
cmcu10 cmcu10 cmcu10.pfb
cmcyr10 cmcyr10 cmcyr10.pfb
cmcyr12 cmcyr12 cmcyr12.pfb
cmcyr17 cmcyr17 cmcyr17.pfb
cmcyr5 cmcyr5 cmcyr5.pfb
cmcyr6 cmcyr6 cmcyr6.pfb
cmcyr7 cmcyr7 cmcyr7.pfb
cmcyr8 cmcyr8 cmcyr8.pfb
cmcyr9 cmcyr9 cmcyr9.pfb
cmex7 TeX-cmex7 fmex7.pfb
cmex8 TeX-cmex8 fmex8.pfb
cmex9 TeX-cmex9 fmex9.pfb
cob Courier-Bold  TeXnANSIEncoding ReEncodeFont  texnansi.enc
cobo Courier-BoldOblique  TeXnANSIEncoding ReEncodeFont  texnansi.enc
com Courier  TeXnANSIEncoding ReEncodeFont  texnansi.enc
contnav ContextNavigation contnav.pfb
coo Courier-Oblique  TeXnANSIEncoding ReEncodeFont  texnansi.enc
csb10 csb10 csb10.pfb
csbx10 csbx10 csbx10.pfb
csbx12 csbx12 csbx12.pfb
csbx5 csbx5 csbx5.pfb
csbx6 csbx6 csbx6.pfb
csbx7 csbx7 csbx7.pfb
csbx8 csbx8 csbx8.pfb
csbx9 csbx9 csbx9.pfb
csbxsl10 csbxsl10 csbxsl10.pfb
csbxti10 csbxti10 csbxti10.pfb
cscsc10 cscsc10 cscsc10.pfb
csdunh10 csdunh10 csdunh10.pfb
csff10 csff10 csff10.pfb
csfi10 csfi10 csfi10.pfb
csfib8 csfib8 csfib8.pfb
csinch csinch csinch.pfb
csitt10 csitt10 csitt10.pfb
csr10 csr10 csr10.pfb
csr12 csr12 csr12.pfb
csr17 csr17 csr17.pfb
csr5 csr5 csr5.pfb
csr6 csr6 csr6.pfb
csr7 csr7 csr7.pfb
csr8 csr8 csr8.pfb
csr9 csr9 csr9.pfb
cssl10 cssl10 cssl10.pfb
cssl12 cssl12 cssl12.pfb
cssl8 cssl8 cssl8.pfb
cssl9 cssl9 cssl9.pfb
cssltt10 cssltt10 cssltt10.pfb
csss10 csss10 csss10.pfb
csss12 csss12 csss12.pfb
csss17 csss17 csss17.pfb
csss8 csss8 csss8.pfb
csss9 csss9 csss9.pfb
csssbx10 csssbx10 csssbx10.pfb
csssdc10 csssdc10 csssdc10.pfb
csssi10 csssi10 csssi10.pfb
csssi12 csssi12 csssi12.pfb
csssi17 csssi17 csssi17.pfb
csssi8 csssi8 csssi8.pfb
csssi9 csssi9 csssi9.pfb
csssq8 csssq8 csssq8.pfb
csssqi8 csssqi8 csssqi8.pfb
cstcsc10 cstcsc10 cstcsc10.pfb
csti10 csti10 csti10.pfb
csti12 csti12 csti12.pfb
csti7 csti7 csti7.pfb
csti8 csti8 csti8.pfb

Bug#329189: tetex-base: dvips -Poutline not using .pfb fonts

2005-10-03 Thread Ralf Stubner
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 23:13 +0200, Arne Ahrend wrote:
 On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 13:03:42 +0200
 Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
You don't, by chance, have backups of the old psfonts_t1.map
  and/or of the updmap log file - either as
  /var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.log, or /tmp/updm*?  If you have some of
  these, please send them - but only the old ones that produced a buggy
  psfonts_t1.map is of any use.
 
 I could not find any such log file and did not keep the original map file.
 However, I am able to reproduce the problem by completely removing tetex-base,
 tetex-bin and tetex-extra and reinstalling them.
 
 Running of updmap is being reported during the installation,
 but the resulting /var/lib/texmf/dvips/config/psfonts_t1.map
 appears to match the one I had prior to reporting this issue.

I am not sure if this helps debugging, but the fonts that where
initially missing from psfonts_t1.map are the ones from bsr.map,
bsr-interpolated.map, omega.map, xypic.map and eurosym.map. This are the
map files (and fonts) provided by tetex-extra. I would expect 
updmap to be called twice. Once during tetex-base configuration and once
during tetex-extra configuration. This sounds as if update-updmap was
executed during tetex-extra configuration, but not updmap itself.

cheerio
ralf



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#329189: tetex-base: dvips -Poutline not using .pfb fonts

2005-09-27 Thread Frank Küster
Arne Ahrend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Package: tetex-base
 Version: 2.0.2c-8
 Severity: normal



 After a fresh install (AMD64) dvips -Pwww or -Poutline would not use
 the .pfb fonts. However, -Pcmz would.  I believe this is due to
 missing entries in /var/lib/texmf/dvips/config/psfonts_t1.map. Running
 updmap manually once resolves the issue, as does overwriting
 /var/lib/texmf/dvips/config/psfonts_t1.map with the one from the i386
 distribution.

This file should be generated by running updmap in the postinst (of both
tetex-base and tetex-bin) - and if that fails, the postinst should
fail.  You don't, by chance, have backups of the old psfonts_t1.map
and/or of the updmap log file - either as
/var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.log, or /tmp/updm*?  If you have some of
these, please send them - but only the old ones that produced a buggy
psfonts_t1.map is of any use.

Regards, Frank

-- 
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer




Bug#329189: tetex-base: dvips -Poutline not using .pfb fonts

2005-09-20 Thread Arne Ahrend
Package: tetex-base
Version: 2.0.2c-8
Severity: normal



After a fresh install (AMD64) dvips -Pwww or -Poutline would not use the .pfb 
fonts. However, -Pcmz would.
I believe this is due to missing entries in 
/var/lib/texmf/dvips/config/psfonts_t1.map. Running updmap manually
once resolves the issue, as does overwriting 
/var/lib/texmf/dvips/config/psfonts_t1.map with the one from the
i386 distribution.

##
 List of ls-R files

-rw-rw-r--  1 root staff 79 Sep 20 00:29 /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R
-rw-rw-r--  1 root users 742 Sep 20 00:29 /var/lib/texmf/ls-R
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root 29 Sep 13 01:05 /usr/share/texmf/ls-R - 
/var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXMFMAIN

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-rc1
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages tetex-base depends on:
ii  debconf   1.4.58 Debian configuration management sy
ii  dpkg  1.13.11package maintenance system for Deb
ii  texinfo   4.7-2.2Documentation system for on-line i
ii  ucf   2.001  Update Configuration File: preserv

Versions of packages tetex-base recommends:
pn  tetex-doc none (no description available)

Versions of packages tetex-bin depends on:
ii  debconf1.4.58Debian configuration management sy
ii  debianutils2.14.3Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii  dpkg   1.13.11   package maintenance system for Deb
ii  ed 0.2-20The classic unix line editor
ii  libc6  2.3.5-6   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc11:4.0.1-2 GCC support library
ii  libice66.8.2.dfsg.1-6Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libkpathsea3   2.0.2-31  path search library for teTeX (run
ii  libpaper1  1.1.14-3  Library for handling paper charact
ii  libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-1PNG library - runtime
ii  libsm6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-6X Window System Session Management
ii  libstdc++6 4.0.1-2   The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libt1-55.1.0-2   Type 1 font rasterizer library - r
ii  libwww05.4.0-9   The W3C WWW library
ii  libx11-6   6.8.2.dfsg.1-6X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxaw76.8.2.dfsg.1-6X Athena widget set library
ii  libxext6   6.8.2.dfsg.1-6X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxmu66.8.2.dfsg.1-6X Window System miscellaneous util
ii  libxt6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-6X Toolkit Intrinsics
ii  mime-support   3.35-1MIME files 'mime.types'  'mailcap
ii  perl   5.8.7-3   Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 
ii  sed4.1.2-8   The GNU sed stream editor
ii  ucf2.001 Update Configuration File: preserv
ii  xlibs  6.8.2.dfsg.1-6X Window System client libraries m
ii  zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4.sarge.2 compression library - runtime

Versions of packages tetex-extra depends on:
ii  dpkg  1.13.11package maintenance system for Deb
ii  gsfonts   8.14+v8.11+urw-0.2 Fonts for the Ghostscript interpre
ii  tetex-bin 2.0.2-31   The teTeX binary files
ii  ucf   2.001  Update Configuration File: preserv

-- debconf information excluded


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]