Bug#330278: tetex-extra: Failed package install and missing dependency
Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, this is not OK. After purging teTeX /etc/texmf should be empty. Indeed, but it isn't: Purging configuration files for tetex-base ... dpkg - warning: while removing tetex-base, directory `/etc/texmf/latex' not empty so not removed. Removing tex-common ... Purging configuration files for tex-common ... dpkg - warning: while removing tex-common, directory `/etc/texmf/fmt.d' not empty so not removed. dpkg - warning: while removing tex-common, directory `/etc/texmf' not empty so not removed. > This needs work. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# find /etc/texmf/ /etc/texmf/ /etc/texmf/pdftex /etc/texmf/pdftex/pdftex.cfg.postinst-bak /etc/texmf/latex /etc/texmf/latex/lambda.ini /etc/texmf/fmt.d /etc/texmf/fmt.d/00tetex.cnf /etc/texmf/oldstuff_unused /etc/texmf/oldstuff_unused/latex.ini /etc/texmf/oldstuff_unused/cyrtex.ini /etc/texmf/oldstuff_unused/cyrtxinf.ini /etc/texmf/oldstuff_unused/cyramstx.ini /etc/texmf/oldstuff_unused/etex.ini /etc/texmf/oldstuff_unused/platex.ini /etc/texmf/oldstuff_unused/cont-de.ini /etc/texmf/oldstuff_unused/cont-en.ini /etc/texmf/oldstuff_unused/cont-it.ini /etc/texmf/oldstuff_unused/cont-nl.ini /etc/texmf/oldstuff_unused/cont-ro.ini /etc/texmf/oldstuff_unused/cont-uk.ini /etc/texmf/oldstuff_unused/cont-cz.ini /etc/texmf/oldstuff_unused/README /etc/texmf/language.dat.postinst-bak lambda.ini should be moved away (oldstuff or delete) at installation/upgrade time, the others upon purge. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
Bug#330278: tetex-extra: Failed package install and missing dependency
Am Donnerstag, den 29.09.2005, 12:46 +0200 schrieb Hilmar Preusse: > Well, this is not OK. After purging teTeX /etc/texmf should be empty. > This needs work. Did you modify that 01tetex.cnf manually? No, I didn't. Chris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330278: tetex-extra: Failed package install and missing dependency
On 27.09.05 Christian von Kietzell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 27.09.2005, 10:34 +0200 schrieb Hilmar Preusse: Hi, > > > ii tetex-bin 2.0.2-31 The teTeX binary files > > > > > teTeX-bin 2.0.2 does not contain the aleph program. I'm pretty > > sure you see the program aleph from the package aleph. There > > still remains the question why tetex-extra tries to build a > > format for it. Did you have ever teTeX 3.0 installed and > > /etc/texmf/fmt.d/01tetex.cnf is still on your system? > > I did indeed. But I purged everything before I installed the > version from unstable again. Obviously a lot of stuff remained in > /etc/texmf/ even after I had removed each and every TeX-related > package. > Well, this is not OK. After purging teTeX /etc/texmf should be empty. This needs work. Did you modify that 01tetex.cnf manually? H. -- sigmentation fault -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330278: tetex-extra: Failed package install and missing dependency
Am Dienstag, den 27.09.2005, 10:34 +0200 schrieb Hilmar Preusse: > > ii tetex-bin 2.0.2-31 The teTeX binary files > > > teTeX-bin 2.0.2 does not contain the aleph program. I'm pretty sure > you see the program aleph from the package aleph. There still remains > the question why tetex-extra tries to build a format for it. Did you > have ever teTeX 3.0 installed and /etc/texmf/fmt.d/01tetex.cnf is > still on your system? I did indeed. But I purged everything before I installed the version from unstable again. Obviously a lot of stuff remained in /etc/texmf/ even after I had removed each and every TeX-related package. I did it again and checked with "dpkg -S texmf" that no installed package had any files left in there. After (re)moving /etc/texmf reinstallation of all the packages worked. Sorry for the false alert. Regards, Chris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330278: tetex-extra: Failed package install and missing dependency
On 27.09.05 Christian von Kietzell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hi, > Package install fails with the following messages. And that happens > after I installed aleph (before, it reported aleph was missing > completely - looks like tetex-extra should depend on it): > Sorry, I missed that passage. The aleph package has nothing to do with teTeX (see #325551). Interesting is only why he complained about missing aleph. Please answer the questions I asked before. > ii tetex-base2.0.2c-8 Basic library files of teTeX > ii tetex-bin 2.0.2-31 The teTeX binary files > H. -- sigmentation fault -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330278: tetex-extra: Failed package install and missing dependency
reassign 330278 tetex-bin stop On 27.09.05 Christian von Kietzell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hi, > Setting up tetex-extra (2.0.2c-8) ... > > Running initex. This may take some time. ... > warning: Could not open char translation file `cp227.tcx'. > warning: Could not open char translation file `cp227.tcx'. > fatal: illegal option -ini > Error: `aleph -ini -jobname=lamed -progname=lamed *lambda.ini' failed > Strange. What does "dpkg -S aleph" and "dpkg -l aleph" tell you? > ii tetex-bin 2.0.2-31 The teTeX binary files > teTeX-bin 2.0.2 does not contain the aleph program. I'm pretty sure you see the program aleph from the package aleph. There still remains the question why tetex-extra tries to build a format for it. Did you have ever teTeX 3.0 installed and /etc/texmf/fmt.d/01tetex.cnf is still on your system? H. -- sigmentation fault -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330278: tetex-extra: Failed package install and missing dependency
Package: tetex-extra Version: 2.0.2c-8 Severity: normal Package install fails with the following messages. And that happens after I installed aleph (before, it reported aleph was missing completely - looks like tetex-extra should depend on it): === Setting up tetex-extra (2.0.2c-8) ... Creating config file /etc/texmf/dvips/config.ams with new version Creating config file /etc/texmf/dvips/config.cm with new version Creating config file /etc/texmf/dvips/config.amz with new version Creating config file /etc/texmf/dvips/config.cmz with new version Running initex. This may take some time. ... warning: Could not open char translation file `cp227.tcx'. warning: Could not open char translation file `cp227.tcx'. fatal: illegal option -ini Error: `aleph -ini -jobname=lamed -progname=lamed *lambda.ini' failed fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/lambda.oft installed. fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/omega.oft installed. fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/amstex.fmt installed. fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/metafun.mem installed. fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/mpost.mem installed. ### fmtutil: Error! Not all formats have been built successfully. Visit the log files in directory /var/lib/texmf/web2c for details. ### This is a summary of all `failed' messages and warnings: `aleph -ini -jobname=lamed -progname=lamed *lambda.ini' failed Running fmtutil failed. dpkg: error processing tetex-extra (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 === Cheers, Chris -- Package-specific info: Please read and follow the instructions in the first lines below the text: "-- Package-specific info:". Thank you. Press ENTER to continue If you report an error when running one of the TeX-related binaries (latex, pdftex, metafont,...), or if the bug is related to bad or wrong output, please include a MINIMAL example input file that produces the error in your report. Don't forget to also include minimal examples of other files that are needed, e.g. bibtex databases. Often it also helps to include the logfile. Please, never send included pictures! If your example file isn't short or produces more than one page of output (except when multiple pages are needed to show the problem), you can probably minimize it further. Instructions on how to do that can be found at http://www.latex-einfuehrung.de/mini-en.html (english) or http://www.latex-einfuehrung.de/mini.html (german) ## minimal input file ## other files ## List of ls-R files -rw-rw-r-- 1 root staff 79 2005-09-27 09:46 /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R -rw-rw-r-- 1 root users 957 2005-09-27 09:54 /var/lib/texmf/ls-R lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 29 2005-09-27 09:42 /usr/share/texmf/ls-R -> /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXMFMAIN -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.1 Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages tetex-extra depends on: ii dpkg 1.13.11.0.1package maintenance system for Deb ii gsfonts 8.14+v8.11+urw-0.2 Fonts for the Ghostscript interpre ii tetex-base2.0.2c-8 Basic library files of teTeX ii tetex-bin 2.0.2-31 The teTeX binary files ii ucf 2.002 Update Configuration File: preserv tetex-extra recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
