Bug#334357: unneeded hunks for GENERIC in debian/patches
Robert Millan a écrit : On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 11:58:58AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: Robert Millan a ?crit : Package: kfreebsd-5 Severity: minor The following patches contain hunks for sys/i386/conf/GENERIC which aren't really used (since the config file is now in config/*). Perhaps they should be removed: This GENERIC configuration file is still provided in kfreebsd-source-5.4, so I think it is a good idea to provide it. What do you think? I'm not sure. I think it's confusing to provide complete files in config/, but still provide the patches. That can lead to inconsistencies easily. How do Linux packages do this? The Linux packages make some modifications on the config files, just as we do. However, I have looked at the patch, and it is not necessary to use it to get a working FreeBSD kernel. I'll remove it in the next upload. Aurelien -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334357: unneeded hunks for GENERIC in debian/patches
Robert Millan a écrit : Package: kfreebsd-5 Severity: minor The following patches contain hunks for sys/i386/conf/GENERIC which aren't really used (since the config file is now in config/*). Perhaps they should be removed: This GENERIC configuration file is still provided in kfreebsd-source-5.4, so I think it is a good idea to provide it. What do you think? Aurelien -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334357: unneeded hunks for GENERIC in debian/patches
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 11:58:58AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: Robert Millan a ?crit : Package: kfreebsd-5 Severity: minor The following patches contain hunks for sys/i386/conf/GENERIC which aren't really used (since the config file is now in config/*). Perhaps they should be removed: This GENERIC configuration file is still provided in kfreebsd-source-5.4, so I think it is a good idea to provide it. What do you think? I'm not sure. I think it's confusing to provide complete files in config/, but still provide the patches. That can lead to inconsistencies easily. How do Linux packages do this? -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334357: unneeded hunks for GENERIC in debian/patches
Package: kfreebsd-5
Severity: minor
The following patches contain hunks for sys/i386/conf/GENERIC which aren't
really used (since the config file is now in config/*). Perhaps they should
be removed:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp/kfreebsd/kfreebsd-5-5.4$ lsdiff -H
debian/patches/90{1,3,6}*
debian/patches/901_config.diff:sys/i386/conf/GENERIC
debian/patches/903_disable_non-free_drivers.diff:sys/conf/files
debian/patches/903_disable_non-free_drivers.diff:sys/conf/files.i386
debian/patches/903_disable_non-free_drivers.diff:sys/conf/kern.pre.mk
debian/patches/903_disable_non-free_drivers.diff:sys/i386/conf/GENERIC
debian/patches/903_disable_non-free_drivers.diff:sys/modules/Makefile
debian/patches/906_grow_sysv_ipc_limits.diff:sys/i386/conf/GENERIC
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: kfreebsd-i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: GNU/kFreeBSD 5.3-1
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL
set to C)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
