Bug#338911: udev 0.074-2 fails to start with linux 2.6.14
I recompiled the kernel with the missing option, reinstalled udev 0.074-2 again - udev works as exspected. The linux-images should all be checked, that this option is enabled (I do not know how this affecs older images 2.6.14 - eventually there should be a dependance of udev to the newer linux images). Uwe P.S.: @Marco: The corrupt rule does not show in syslog with 0.074-2 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#338911: udev 0.074-2 fails to start with linux 2.6.14
Package: udev Version: 0.074-2 Severity: grave Since today I have a linux-2.6.12 (with mkinitrd) and linux-2.6.14 (with yaird) running in parallel on an alpha machine (Alphastation 500/500). With udev-0.071-1 the system starts without any problems with both kernels. When then switching to udev-0.074-2 (installed by apt-get with testing today), udevd fails to start with linux-2.6.14. The entries from syslog: Nov 13 18:22:14 localhost udevd[8989]: main: uevent socket not available Nov 13 18:22:14 localhost udevd[8994]: init_uevent_netlink_sock: bind failed: No such file or directory Additionally I have a lot of occurences of the following warning with udev-0.071-1: Nov 13 19:04:09 localhost udev[3832]: add_to_rules: invalid rule 'PROGRAM' All this does not happen with 2.6.12. The problem is, that the new initrd system (yaird) uses udev extensively because the initrd does only loads the root file system no network drivers or other scsi dirvers. A failing udev hangs the whole boot process. So I started the system in emergency mode with kernel 2.6.12 again, reinstalled old udev and set pacakage to HOLD. System information:alpha:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo cpu : Alpha cpu model : EV56 cpu variation : 7 cpu revision : 0 cpu serial number : system type : Alcor system variation : Alcor system revision : 0 system serial number : cycle frequency [Hz] : 5 timer frequency [Hz] : 1024.00 page size [bytes] : 8192 phys. address bits : 40 max. addr. space # : 127 BogoMIPS : 994.44 kernel unaligned acc : 0 (pc=0,va=0) user unaligned acc : 0 (pc=0,va=0) platform string : Digital AlphaStation 500/500 cpus detected : 1 L1 Icache : 8K, 1-way, 32b line L1 Dcache : 8K, 1-way, 32b line L2 cache : 96K, 3-way, 64b line L3 cache : 8192K, 1-way, 64b line alpha:~# mount /dev/sda3 on / type ext3 (rw,errors=remount-ro) /dev/sda2 on /boot type ext2 (rw) /dev/sda4 on /var type ext3 (rw) /dev/sdb1 on /home type ext3 (rw) /dev/shm on /tmp type none (rw,bind) proc on /proc type proc (rw) sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw) devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,gid=5,mode=620) tmpfs on /dev/shm type tmpfs (rw) usbfs on /proc/bus/usb type usbfs (rw) tmpfs on /dev type tmpfs (rw,size=10M,mode=0755) automount(pid3918) on /misc type autofs (rw,fd=4,pgrp=3918,minproto=2,maxproto=4) alpha:~# lspci :00:06.0 Ethernet controller: Digital Equipment Corporation DECchip 21040 [Tulip] (rev 26) :00:07.0 RAID bus controller: Silicon Image, Inc. SiI 3114 [SATALink/SATARaid] Serial ATA Controller (rev 02) :00:08.0 VGA compatible controller: Digital Equipment Corporation PBXGB [TGA2] (rev 22) :00:09.0 SCSI storage controller: QLogic Corp. ISP1020 Fast-wide SCSI (rev 02) :00:0a.0 Non-VGA unclassified device: Intel Corporation 82375EB/SB PCI to EISA Bridge (rev 15) :00:0b.0 Ethernet controller: Digital Equipment Corporation DECchip 21140 [FasterNet] (rev 20) :00:0c.0 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB (rev 43) :00:0c.1 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB (rev 43) :00:0c.2 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB 2.0 (rev 04) - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de - http://www.schindlers-software.de eMails: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (private); [EMAIL PROTECTED] (company) Tel./Fax: +49 700 PCLATEIN (+49 700 72528346) Schindlers Software - Home of Schindlers PC-LATEIN 3.20 DIE Software zum Lateinlernen!
Bug#338911: udev 0.074-2 fails to start with linux 2.6.14
severity 338911 important tag 338911 unreproducible moreinfo thanks On Nov 13, Uwe Schindler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since today I have a linux-2.6.12 (with mkinitrd) and linux-2.6.14 (with yaird) running in parallel on an alpha machine (Alphastation 500/500). Did you build your own kernel? I wonder if this is alpha-specific. Nov 13 18:22:14 localhost udevd[8994]: init_uevent_netlink_sock: bind failed: No such file or directory This is the code that fails: snl.nl_family = AF_NETLINK; snl.nl_pid = getpid(); snl.nl_groups = 0x; uevent_netlink_sock = socket(PF_NETLINK, SOCK_DGRAM, NETLINK_KOBJECT_UEVENT); retval = bind(uevent_netlink_sock, (struct sockaddr *) snl, sizeof(struct sockaddr_nl)); But I do not know exactly what ENOENT means when binding an AF_NETLINK socket. Additionally I have a lot of occurences of the following warning with udev-0.071-1: Nov 13 19:04:09 localhost udev[3832]: add_to_rules: invalid rule 'PROGRAM' As it says, it looks like one or more of your rules are broken. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#338911: udev 0.074-2 fails to start with linux 2.6.14
At 20:23 13.11.2005, Marco d'Itri wrote: severity 338911 important tag 338911 unreproducible moreinfo thanks On Nov 13, Uwe Schindler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since today I have a linux-2.6.12 (with mkinitrd) and linux-2.6.14 (with yaird) running in parallel on an alpha machine (Alphastation 500/500). Did you build your own kernel? I wonder if this is alpha-specific. Yes its my own kernel, but this is only a patched debian one (fixed IRQ handler). So almost exactly the debian one. Nov 13 18:22:14 localhost udevd[8994]: init_uevent_netlink_sock: bind failed: No such file or directory This is the code that fails: snl.nl_family = AF_NETLINK; snl.nl_pid = getpid(); snl.nl_groups = 0x; uevent_netlink_sock = socket(PF_NETLINK, SOCK_DGRAM, NETLINK_KOBJECT_UEVENT); retval = bind(uevent_netlink_sock, (struct sockaddr *) snl, sizeof(struct sockaddr_nl)); But I do not know exactly what ENOENT means when binding an AF_NETLINK socket. Cannot help here, you should send the bug upstream. Is there a change in the code compared to 0.071? Additionally I have a lot of occurences of the following warning with udev-0.071-1: Nov 13 19:04:09 localhost udev[3832]: add_to_rules: invalid rule 'PROGRAM' As it says, it looks like one or more of your rules are broken. I will look after it, but I did not change any of the default rules... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#338911: udev 0.074-2 fails to start with linux 2.6.14
On Nov 13, Uwe Schindler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Cannot help here, you should send the bug upstream. I did. Is there a change in the code compared to 0.071? Many. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#338911: udev 0.074-2 fails to start with linux 2.6.14
Found the problem. It seem that for alpha kernels the following is not enabled: alpha:/boot# grep UEV config-2.6.14-alcor # CONFIG_KOBJECT_UEVENT is not set I did not change that, in the original kernel it is the same: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/boot$ grep UEV config-2.6.14-1-alpha-generic # CONFIG_KOBJECT_UEVENT is not set So we should assign this bug to package linux-2.6 for alpha From the Release Notes of udev: udev 073 Fixed bug in udevd, if inotify is not available. We depend on netlink uevents now, kernels without that event source will not work with that version of udev anymore. Uwe At 20:40 13.11.2005, Marco d'Itri wrote: On Nov 13, Uwe Schindler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Cannot help here, you should send the bug upstream. I did. Is there a change in the code compared to 0.071? Many. -- ciao, Marco - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de - http://www.schindlers-software.de eMails: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (private); [EMAIL PROTECTED] (company) Tel./Fax: +49 700 PCLATEIN (+49 700 72528346) Schindlers Software - Home of Schindlers PC-LATEIN 3.20 DIE Software zum Lateinlernen! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
