Bug#340150: jwm: *** glibc detected *** free(): invalid next size (normal): 0x0000000000531e50 ***

2006-02-17 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 11:10:55PM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> > On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 09:00:06PM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:

> >> >>   http://cante.net/~jaalto/tmp/debian/jwm

> >>   svn-buildpackage -uc -us -rfakeroot

> > Yes, that appears to have done the correct thing for the most part; the
> > package is correctly non-native, and the trunk directory is gone -- the only
> > problem I see now is that your .orig.tar.gz contains .svn directories which
> > it should not; since
> > "svn+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/home/svn/deb/pkg/jwm/trunk" is not a svn uri
> > that's valid for anyone else, the svn metadata doesn't belong in the
> > orig.tar.gz, and having it there doubles the size of the tarball.  Please
> > rebuild your tarball with --exclude .svn.  It's also common practice to
> > exclude the debian/ directory from the upstream tarball, even when it's
> > present in the same source repository, since (among other reasons) it's not
> > possible to delete a file from under debian/ using the .diff.gz...

> I'll keep these in mind in the future.

> > Everything else looks good, so if you get this taken care of I can
> > upload it with no problems.

> Thank you for your time and good suggestions. I think I made some
> fundamental mistake with 1.1 + svn-buildpackage and that's why the
> .svn dirs are there. 

> I've upgrade to 1.3 as well, so you can get the new *.deb files from

>http://cante.net/~jaalto/tmp/debian/jwm

Ok, was able to review this finally, and it looks good.  Will be uploaded
shortly.

Cheers,
-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#340150: jwm: *** glibc detected *** free(): invalid next size (normal): 0x0000000000531e50 ***

2006-02-05 Thread Jari Aalto
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 09:00:06PM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:
>
>> >>   http://cante.net/~jaalto/tmp/debian/jwm
>
>>   svn-buildpackage -uc -us -rfakeroot
>
> Yes, that appears to have done the correct thing for the most part; the
> package is correctly non-native, and the trunk directory is gone -- the only
> problem I see now is that your .orig.tar.gz contains .svn directories which
> it should not; since
> "svn+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/home/svn/deb/pkg/jwm/trunk" is not a svn uri
> that's valid for anyone else, the svn metadata doesn't belong in the
> orig.tar.gz, and having it there doubles the size of the tarball.  Please
> rebuild your tarball with --exclude .svn.  It's also common practice to
> exclude the debian/ directory from the upstream tarball, even when it's
> present in the same source repository, since (among other reasons) it's not
> possible to delete a file from under debian/ using the .diff.gz...

I'll keep these in mind in the future.

> Everything else looks good, so if you get this taken care of I can
> upload it with no problems.

Thank you for your time and good suggestions. I think I made some
fundamental mistake with 1.1 + svn-buildpackage and that's why the
.svn dirs are there. 

I've upgrade to 1.3 as well, so you can get the new *.deb files from

   http://cante.net/~jaalto/tmp/debian/jwm

Jari



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#340150: jwm: *** glibc detected *** free(): invalid next size (normal): 0x0000000000531e50 ***

2006-02-05 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 09:00:06PM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:

> I've been busy but I ahve now prepared new verison of the package.
> If you find the time to check it, that would be welcomed.

> >> > Severity: grave, because amd64 is a release architecture.

> >> > Jari, if you have packages for 1.1 available, I might be able to
> >> > sponsor an upload of them for you.

> >>   http://cante.net/~jaalto/tmp/debian/jwm

> > Some changes:

> > - The package is a native package (no .orig.tar.gz).  Please change it to
> >   non-native.

> I used options:

>   svn-buildpackage -uc -us -rfakeroot

> Let me know how to fix this issue if this is not correct method.

Yes, that appears to have done the correct thing for the most part; the
package is correctly non-native, and the trunk directory is gone -- the only
problem I see now is that your .orig.tar.gz contains .svn directories which
it should not; since
"svn+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/home/svn/deb/pkg/jwm/trunk" is not a svn uri
that's valid for anyone else, the svn metadata doesn't belong in the
orig.tar.gz, and having it there doubles the size of the tarball.  Please
rebuild your tarball with --exclude .svn.  It's also common practice to
exclude the debian/ directory from the upstream tarball, even when it's
present in the same source repository, since (among other reasons) it's not
possible to delete a file from under debian/ using the .diff.gz...

Everything else looks good, so if you get this taken care of I can upload it
with no problems.
 
-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#340150: jwm: *** glibc detected *** free(): invalid next size (normal): 0x0000000000531e50 ***

2006-02-04 Thread Jari Aalto
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Hi Steve,

I've been busy but I ahve now prepared new verison of the package.
If you find the time to check it, that would be welcomed.

>> > Severity: grave, because amd64 is a release architecture.
>
>> > Jari, if you have packages for 1.1 available, I might be able to
>> > sponsor an upload of them for you.
>
>>   http://cante.net/~jaalto/tmp/debian/jwm
>
> Some changes:
>
> - The package is a native package (no .orig.tar.gz).  Please change it to
>   non-native.

I used options:

  svn-buildpackage -uc -us -rfakeroot

Let me know how to fix this issue if this is not correct method.

> - You are closing bug #327013 in the changelog, but you say this is *not*
>   the version which fixes it; please don't do this.  Close the bug using the
>   BTS mail interface instead.

Thanks. Done.

> - You have duplicate build-dependencies on libx11-dev.  You may also
>   (looking at the diff) be missing a build-dependency on libpng-dev?

Added. and libxinerama-dev and other too.

> - The trunk/ directory contains a complete second copy of the sources, which
>   almost certainly shouldn't be there; I'm assuming this isn't present in
>   the upstream tarball.

I've swithed to svn-buildpackage which presumably handles this
correctly.

> - The package does not build from source because debian/rules calls "make",
>   not "make all", and the first (i.e., default) rule in the Makefile is
>   *not* "all" -- it's "dput-local".

Fixed. I forgot that the first target is "the default".

> If you address these issues, I should be able to upload for you.  I was able
> to reproduce the original bug on alpha with 0.23-3, and the bug does not
> occur with jwm 1.1-1.
>
> Also, I see that you're build-depending on libxt-dev; it should be trivial
> to remove the need for libxt-dev just by re-running autoconf on the source
> package before building, so please consider this alternative.

autoconf rerun. You can get new build at

  http://cante.net/~jaalto/tmp/debian/jwm

Jari



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#340150: jwm: *** glibc detected *** free(): invalid next size (normal): 0x0000000000531e50 ***

2006-01-18 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Jari,

On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 11:07:14PM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> > severity 340150 grave
> > thanks

> > Severity: grave, because amd64 is a release architecture.

> > Jari, if you have packages for 1.1 available, I might be able to sponsor an
> > upload of them for you.

> I have. I've already sent message to Mac if he can test the new
> release under amd. If you can help as well, the packages can be
> downloaded from

>   http://cante.net/~jaalto/tmp/debian/jwm

> Thank for offering the upload (and possible testing).

Some changes:

- The package is a native package (no .orig.tar.gz).  Please change it to
  non-native.
- You are closing bug #327013 in the changelog, but you say this is *not*
  the version which fixes it; please don't do this.  Close the bug using the
  BTS mail interface instead.
- You have duplicate build-dependencies on libx11-dev.  You may also
  (looking at the diff) be missing a build-dependency on libpng-dev?
- The trunk/ directory contains a complete second copy of the sources, which
  almost certainly shouldn't be there; I'm assuming this isn't present in
  the upstream tarball.
- The package does not build from source because debian/rules calls "make",
  not "make all", and the first (i.e., default) rule in the Makefile is
  *not* "all" -- it's "dput-local".

If you address these issues, I should be able to upload for you.  I was able
to reproduce the original bug on alpha with 0.23-3, and the bug does not
occur with jwm 1.1-1.

Also, I see that you're build-depending on libxt-dev; it should be trivial
to remove the need for libxt-dev just by re-running autoconf on the source
package before building, so please consider this alternative.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#340150: jwm: *** glibc detected *** free(): invalid next size (normal): 0x0000000000531e50 ***

2006-01-17 Thread Jari Aalto
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> severity 340150 grave
> thanks
>
> Severity: grave, because amd64 is a release architecture.
>
> Jari, if you have packages for 1.1 available, I might be able to sponsor an
> upload of them for you.

I have. I've already sent message to Mac if he can test the new
release under amd. If you can help as well, the packages can be
downloaded from

  http://cante.net/~jaalto/tmp/debian/jwm

Thank for offering the upload (and possible testing).

Jari



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#340150: jwm: *** glibc detected *** free(): invalid next size (normal): 0x0000000000531e50 ***

2006-01-17 Thread Steve Langasek
severity 340150 grave
thanks

Severity: grave, because amd64 is a release architecture.

Jari, if you have packages for 1.1 available, I might be able to sponsor an
upload of them for you.

Cheers,
-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#340150: jwm: *** glibc detected *** free(): invalid next size (normal): 0x0000000000531e50 ***

2005-11-21 Thread Marc Lehmann
Package: jwm
Version: 0.23-3
Severity: important


On my amd64 system, jwm violently refuses to start :)


JWM: warning: configuration error: invalid tag in Menu: Font
JWM: warning: invalid border width specified: 1
*** glibc detected *** free(): invalid next size (normal): 0x00531e50 
***
Aborted
[Exit 134 (SIGABRT)] 

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages jwm depends on:
hi  libc62.3.5-4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxext6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxpm4  6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 X pixmap library
ii  xlibs6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 X Window System client libraries m

jwm recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]