Bug#363002: xbuffy: Does not report any useful information
package xbuffy tags 363002 pending thanks * Frédéric Brière [EMAIL PROTECTED] [060421 00:25]: On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 09:28:36AM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote: Just since the upgrade from a recent version in Unstable, xbuffy reports all mailboxes to have 0 messages (with option -orig that's no messages in box, without -orig that's no new messages). Same here. 3.3.bl.3-25 works fine, but 3.3.bl.3.dfsg-1 does no good. I'm attaching a trimmed-down message that still exhibits this behavior. (I didn't dare trim it down further, in case the X header parser subs were too picky.) Thanks. With that I found what I overlooked. A version being able to parse this mbox will hit the archives soon. Hochachtungsvoll, Bernhard R. Link -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#363002: xbuffy: Does not report any useful information
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 09:28:36AM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote: Just since the upgrade from a recent version in Unstable, xbuffy reports all mailboxes to have 0 messages (with option -orig that's no messages in box, without -orig that's no new messages). Same here. 3.3.bl.3-25 works fine, but 3.3.bl.3.dfsg-1 does no good. I'm attaching a trimmed-down message that still exhibits this behavior. (I didn't dare trim it down further, in case the X header parser subs were too picky.) That's strange. Well, not given the size of the diff between 3 and 3.dfsg, it ain't. :) -- Frédéric Brière*[EMAIL PROTECTED] = [EMAIL PROTECTED] IS NO MORE: http://www.abacomsucks.com = From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 20 17:17:37 2006 Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 17:17:37 -0400 To: Frederic Briere [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: foo Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frederic Briere) Content-Length: 141 Lines: 6 foo -- Frédéric Brière*[EMAIL PROTECTED] = [EMAIL PROTECTED] IS NO MORE: http://www.abacomsucks.com =
Bug#363002: xbuffy: Does not report any useful information
* Ben Pearre [EMAIL PROTECTED] [060417 04:57]: Just since the upgrade from a recent version in Unstable, xbuffy reports all mailboxes to have 0 messages (with option -orig that's no messages in box, without -orig that's no new messages). [...] I'm using procmail and mutt on local files (ie. berkeley mbox). No Status header field on unread messages, Status: RO is added to read messages. That's strange. What Mailserver do you use? Perhaps it is best to send me the example mailbox, as I can debug the problem then, as I'm currently a bit unsure what could cause this. Hochachtungsvoll, Bernhard R. Link -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#363002: xbuffy: Does not report any useful information
Package: xbuffy Version: 3.3.bl.3.dfsg-1 Severity: important Just since the upgrade from a recent version in Unstable, xbuffy reports all mailboxes to have 0 messages (with option -orig that's no messages in box, without -orig that's no new messages). Age: not sure about this; /usr/share/doc/xbuffy/changelog.Debian does not list anything suspicious recently; previous (working) version may have been up to a couple of months old, also from Unstable, but I don't have a version number. Where can I get that? xbuffy is finding and opening the mailboxes correctly: if I enter an invalid filename it reports -1 messages. Running under strace shows the files being successfully found, stat64'd, opened, read, ... I'm using procmail and mutt on local files (ie. berkeley mbox). No Status header field on unread messages, Status: RO is added to read messages. I'm actually using zsh; not sure why reportbug thinks I'm using bash. Here's some of ~/.xbuffyrc, although I've tried permutations, simple cases (eg. first line only), etc. I'll send a sample mbox file that xbuffy doesn't read if anyone requests it, but that's big... box ~/Mail/Inbox box ~/Mail/ciy box ~/Mail/cu headertime 0 nobeep box ~/Mail/dave box ~/Mail/family box ~/Mail/grade/admin title grade/admin I didn't know what severity to give this bug: xbuffy is completely unusable on my system since it reports no useful information at all (severity 2:Grave), but I have not tested on other systems. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.2 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages xbuffy depends on: ii libc6 2.3.6-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libx11-6 2:1.0.0-6 X11 client-side library ii libxaw7 1:1.0.1-4 X11 Athena Widget library ii libxt61:1.0.0-3 X11 toolkit intrinsics library xbuffy recommends no packages. -- debconf information excluded -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
