Bug#380304: Bug #380304 (nut-usb: bcmxcp_usb does not find ups at bootup)

2006-12-20 Thread Arnaud Quette 

Hi again Sergio,

2006/12/20, Sergio Gelato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

Sorry, I should have read the original bug report more carefully. You
were probably right, and I should have opened two new bugs instead of
piggying back on this one. My apologies. I'd still like that patch
applied, if possible, since it does fix a known bug in nut-usb.


ok, the bad news first:
seems I'm still not awaken enough. I've mixed the udev problem with
that one. Thus I've completely missed the integration of this patch in
-3.

The good news now:
- this patch is included in nut 2.0.5, but there are few (no) chance
to see it make its way into etch,
- but I may release a -4 with some more init  things (lsb compliance)
and more things. No promise, but I'll do my best.

Arnaud
--
Linux / Unix Expert - MGE UPS SYSTEMS - R&D Dpt
Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/
Debian Developer - http://people.debian.org/~aquette/
OpenSource Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#380304: Bug #380304 (nut-usb: bcmxcp_usb does not find ups at bootup)

2006-12-20 Thread Sergio Gelato 
Is this issue really fixed by using the native udev rules? I don't think so.

The rules' only purpose is to change the ownership and permissions on the 
/{dev,proc}/bus/usb device files, and the bug (at least my interpretation 
of it; the original submitter's statement was vague) is reproducible when 
bcmxcp_usb is run as root.

Please reopen this bug.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#380304: Bug #380304 (nut-usb: bcmxcp_usb does not find ups at bootup)

2006-12-20 Thread Sergio Gelato 
Sorry, I should have read the original bug report more carefully. You
were probably right, and I should have opened two new bugs instead of
piggying back on this one. My apologies. I'd still like that patch
applied, if possible, since it does fix a known bug in nut-usb.

* Sergio Gelato [2006-12-20 12:28:17 +0100]:
> Is this issue really fixed by using the native udev rules? I don't think so.
> 
> The rules' only purpose is to change the ownership and permissions on the 
> /{dev,proc}/bus/usb device files, and the bug (at least my interpretation 
> of it; the original submitter's statement was vague) is reproducible when 
> bcmxcp_usb is run as root.
> 
> Please reopen this bug.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]