Bug#388701: Why Beryl has just four packages?
I've stopped Beryl for now since they are officially merging with compiz. I need to speak to the compiz maintainer. I have 0.2.1 in a local git repository but im likely just going to chuck it out. With the merge its moot now. - Original Message From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Shawn Starr [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Anibal Avelar [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2007 5:38:39 AM Subject: Bug#388701: Why Beryl has just four packages? On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 11:55:30AM -0500, Shawn Starr wrote: On Wednesday 14 February 2007 00:27, Anibal Avelar wrote: Hi. I see you have in queue NEW three packages: beryl-plugins, beryl-settings and emerald [1] and not ready (yet) beryl. Firstly, the beryl packages were REJECTED because of license issues. Upstream is working with me on resolving the non-free/license issues that remain these will be fixed for the 0.2.0 stable release of Beryl (coming soon). From their homepage: Mar 14: 0.2.0 Released But they also already have 0.2.1 versions available. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388701: Why Beryl has just four packages?
Hi. On 4/23/07, Shawn Starr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've stopped Beryl for now since they are officially merging with compiz. I need to speak to the compiz maintainer. I know something about this. Do you know is officially? The compiz and beryl teams has problems with this process (was the last notice I knew, but I don't follow the process). What don't you put a personal server while we wait for them? or in experimental? (a personal server would be better). If both projects joins but you don't upload them in unstable, but while we can have beryl, I like beryl than compiz due to the beryl-manager ;) Regards -- Anibal Avelar (FixXxeR) http://fixxxer.cc GPG: 83B64656 - C143 4AD8 B017 53FA B742 D6AA CEEA F9F3 83B6 4656 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388701: Why Beryl has just four packages?
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 11:55:30AM -0500, Shawn Starr wrote: On Wednesday 14 February 2007 00:27, Anibal Avelar wrote: Hi. I see you have in queue NEW three packages: beryl-plugins, beryl-settings and emerald [1] and not ready (yet) beryl. Firstly, the beryl packages were REJECTED because of license issues. Upstream is working with me on resolving the non-free/license issues that remain these will be fixed for the 0.2.0 stable release of Beryl (coming soon). From their homepage: Mar 14: 0.2.0 Released But they also already have 0.2.1 versions available. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388701: Why Beryl has just four packages?
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 00:27, Anibal Avelar wrote: Hi. I see you have in queue NEW three packages: beryl-plugins, beryl-settings and emerald [1] and not ready (yet) beryl. Firstly, the beryl packages were REJECTED because of license issues. Upstream is working with me on resolving the non-free/license issues that remain these will be fixed for the 0.2.0 stable release of Beryl (coming soon). I know beryl has another packages: beryl-dbus beryl-manager and optionally: emerald-themes aquamarine heliodor emerald-themes is not needed as the themes are available from emerald. Plus we cannot confirm the licenses of the themes at this time. Aquamarine is completed again, copyright issues need to be resolved (minor). Heliodor I won't be including, gtk-window-decorator from compiz is the same thing and will work with beryl (im not sure of metacity themes as there are issues with this) Do you have plans for the others packages? Because, I have been waiting from the begining those packages, I built my own packages [2] and I uploaded them in my unofficial Debian repository: deb http://fixxxer.cc/debian unstable/ deb-src http://fixxxer.cc/debian unstable/ I have built five packages: beryl, beryl-manager, beryl-plugins, beryl-settings and emerald from the 0.1.4 version. Please, check them. I just proved them under Intel chipsets, and they are working fine (so far). Shawn, I would appreciate if you will let me help you. I'm Debian maintainer and I have a great interest in beryl. You can find the current work on git.debian.org as mentioned, when 0.2 gold is out we will have all copyright/license issues resolved finally. One important thing is the that beryl 0.1.4 has icons that are non-free (from the tango project) and these will be removed in beryl 0.2.0 as upstream has told me. Otherwise, beryl would have to go into non-free. Regards [1] http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html [2] http://fixxxer.cc/debian/unstable/ Thanks, Shawn. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388701: Why Beryl has just four packages?
Hi. I see you have in queue NEW three packages: beryl-plugins, beryl-settings and emerald [1] and not ready (yet) beryl. I know beryl has another packages: beryl-dbus beryl-manager and optionally: emerald-themes aquamarine heliodor Do you have plans for the others packages? Because, I have been waiting from the begining those packages, I built my own packages [2] and I uploaded them in my unofficial Debian repository: deb http://fixxxer.cc/debian unstable/ deb-src http://fixxxer.cc/debian unstable/ I have built five packages: beryl, beryl-manager, beryl-plugins, beryl-settings and emerald from the 0.1.4 version. Please, check them. I just proved them under Intel chipsets, and they are working fine (so far). Shawn, I would appreciate if you will let me help you. I'm Debian maintainer and I have a great interest in beryl. Regards [1] http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html [2] http://fixxxer.cc/debian/unstable/ -- Anibal Avelar (FixXxeR) http://fixxxer.cc GPG: 83B64656 - C143 4AD8 B017 53FA B742 D6AA CEEA F9F3 83B6 4656 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
