Bug#397608: gabber: really suitable for a release ?

2006-11-08 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Package: gabber
Version: 0.8.8-7
Severity: serious

Hi,

Gabber is unmaintained upstream since 2003, and many other good
alternatives exist (gossip for the lightweight gnome client, gajim for
the feature complete gnome client) and are packaged in Debian. Do we
really want to release with gabber ?

Not to mention that it has 1 serious and 5 important bugs, not counting
this one.
-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#397608: gabber: really suitable for a release ?

2006-11-08 Thread Goedson Teixeira Paixao
Em Qua, 2006-11-08 às 13:32 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum escreveu:
 Package: gabber
 Version: 0.8.8-7
 Severity: serious
 
 Hi,
 
 Gabber is unmaintained upstream since 2003, and many other good
 alternatives exist (gossip for the lightweight gnome client, gajim for
 the feature complete gnome client) and are packaged in Debian. Do we
 really want to release with gabber ?
 
 Not to mention that it has 1 serious and 5 important bugs, not counting
 this one.

I'm fixing the serious bugs and should upload the fix for them and some
other minor bugs by this weekend. Except for these bugs, I see no reason
not to release it in Etch, since it has the same functionality (and
bugs) that are in Sarge. For Etch+1 we'll certainly replace it with
gabber2, which will fix most of the bugs but still lack some
functionality.

-- 
Goedson Teixeira Paixaohttp://mundolivre.wordpress.com/
Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.jabber.org/


signature.asc
Description: Esta é uma parte de mensagem	assinada digitalmente