Bug#397922: kmail: undocumented functionality change in reply to.
Hi We are not going to document upgrade issues from 3.5.4 to 3.5.5 any more. Sorry for the inconvenience and for the processing time /Sune -- I cannot click the bus, how does it work? The point is that from Office XP and from Linux and from the panel menu inside iMac you must install on a clock for turning on a SMTP connection of a mail. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#397922: kmail: undocumented functionality change in reply to.
Am Freitag 10 November 2006 21:02 schrieb Kevin Krammer: The reply-to is not set. I did a bit of experimentation and it seems that 'r' replies to the list if reply-to is absent, but uses reply-to if present which would be even more confusing... Would be interesting to have an earlier version of KMail to check. Do you remember which version still worked the way you expected? Well I would have said the last 3.5.4 but that's not true as I just checked. My wife uses still 3.5.2(1.9.1) which already behaves like 3.5.5(1.9.5). Perhaps someone could check with the sarge version just to be sure. so long Chris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#397922: kmail: undocumented functionality change in reply to.
Package: kmail Version: 4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-1 Severity: normal Hi there, I was just very surprised to see a reply I intedndet to sent to the author of the mail I replyed to apear on the whole list. I am pretty sure that kmail 3.5.4 behaved diffrent. In details: in earlier versions of kmail hitting the r key caused kmail to do an ordanary reply to the address present in from or reply-to header. Hitting the l key did a controled list-reply. Now it seems like kmail also does a list-reply if I hit r and there is a list-post header present which might be surprising (or not). At least I'd like to have this change documented at a prominent position but I'd rather prefere have it as it used to be. When I want to do a list-reply I know best myself. so long Chris -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-skogtun-amd64 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages kmail depends on: ii kdebase-kio-plugins4:3.5.5a.dfsg.1-1 core I/O slaves for KDE ii kdelibs4c2a4:3.5.5a.dfsg.1-3 core libraries and binaries for al ii kdepim-kio-plugins 4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-1 KDE pim I/O Slaves ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libaudio2 1.8-2 The Network Audio System (NAS). (s ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libfontconfig1 2.4.1-2 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.2.1-5 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcc11:4.2-20060709-1 GCC support library ii libice61:1.0.1-2 X11 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libidn11 0.6.5-1 GNU libidn library, implementation ii libjpeg62 6b-13 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libkcal2b 4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-1 KDE calendaring library ii libkdepim1a4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-1 KDE PIM library ii libkleopatra1 4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-1 KDE GnuPG interface libraries ii libkmime2 4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-1 KDE MIME interface library ii libkpimidentities1 4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-1 KDE PIM user identity information ii libksieve0 4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-1 KDE mail/news message filtering li ii libmimelib1c2a 4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-1 KDE mime library ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-7PNG library - runtime ii libqt3-mt 3:3.3.7-1 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libsm6 1:1.0.1-3 X11 Session Management library ii libstdc++6 4.2-20060709-1The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 2:1.0.3-2 X11 client-side library ii libxcursor11.1.7-4 X cursor management library ii libxext6 1:1.0.1-2 X11 miscellaneous extension librar ii libxft22.1.8.2-8 FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxi6 1:1.0.1-3 X11 Input extension library ii libxinerama1 1:1.0.1-4.1 X11 Xinerama extension library ii libxrandr2 2:1.1.0.2-4 X11 RandR extension library ii libxrender11:0.9.1-3 X Rendering Extension client libra ii libxt6 1:1.0.2-2 X11 toolkit intrinsics library ii perl 5.8.8-6.1 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-13compression library - runtime Versions of packages kmail recommends: ii procmail 3.22-16Versatile e-mail processor -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#397922: kmail: undocumented functionality change in reply to.
On Friday 10 November 2006 14:23, Christian Frommeyer wrote: Package: kmail Version: 4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-1 Severity: normal Hi there, I was just very surprised to see a reply I intedndet to sent to the author of the mail I replyed to apear on the whole list. I am pretty sure that kmail 3.5.4 behaved diffrent. In details: in earlier versions of kmail hitting the r key caused kmail to do an ordanary reply to the address present in from or reply-to header. Hitting the l key did a controled list-reply. Now it seems like kmail also does a list-reply if I hit r and there is a list-post header present which might be surprising (or not). I just tested this with the mail your report generated on the debian-qt-kde mailinglist. Pressing'r' creates this very mail, i.e. two addresses (you and the bugreport). Pressing 'l' generates a mail to the list. Same package version. Which mailinglist did you test it with, maybe it sets itself as the reply-to address? Cheers, Kevin pgpPRwOYDbj5E.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#397922: kmail: undocumented functionality change in reply to.
Am Freitag 10 November 2006 19:54 schrieb Kevin Krammer: I just tested this with the mail your report generated on the debian-qt-kde mailinglist. Pressing'r' creates this very mail, i.e. two addresses (you and the bugreport). Well I can't comment this as I don't have the headers. Pressing 'l' generates a mail to the list. thats working here perfectly as well. Which mailinglist did you test it with, maybe it sets itself as the reply-to address? I first realised the problem on a private list but its the same with e.g. debian-user-german. Sample headers below: Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 19:30:17 +0100 Received-SPF: none (mxeu14: 70.103.162.31 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of lists.debian.org) client-ip=70.103.162.31; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; helo=murphy.debian.org; Received: from [70.103.162.31] (helo=murphy.debian.org) by mx.kundenserver.de (node=mxeu14) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0ML3Dg-1Gib8q3YaO-0006Ez for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 19:30:17 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by murphy.debian.org (Postfix) with QMQP id A3F172E80B; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 12:30:13 -0600 (CST) Old-Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Original-To: debian-user-german@lists.debian.org Received: from ares.dyndns.biz (d014235.adsl.hansenet.de [80.171.14.235]) by murphy.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C1992E6F1 for debian-user-german@lists.debian.org; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 12:30:09 -0600 (CST) Received: from [10.0.0.2] (nova [10.0.0.2]) by ares.dyndns.biz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DA0C5B83D for debian-user-german@lists.debian.org; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 20:30:05 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 19:33:50 +0100 From: Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: debian-user-german@lists.debian.org Subject: debian auf neuer Partition und Partition check Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rc-Virus: 2006-10-25_01 X-Rc-Spam: 2006-04-09_01 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on murphy.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=4.0 tests=AWL,IMPRONONCABLE_1, LDOSUBSCRIBER,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,UNWANTED_LANGUAGE_BODY autolearn=no version=3.0.3 Resent-Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Resent-From: debian-user-german@lists.debian.org X-Mailing-List: debian-user-german@lists.debian.org archive/latest/192581 X-Loop: debian-user-german@lists.debian.org List-Id: debian-user-german.lists.debian.org List-Post: mailto:debian-user-german@lists.debian.org List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Subscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Precedence: list Resent-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Resent-Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 12:30:13 -0600 (CST) Envelope-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status: R X-Status: NC X-KMail-EncryptionState: X-KMail-SignatureState: X-KMail-MDN-Sent: so long Chris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#397922: kmail: undocumented functionality change in reply to.
On Friday 10 November 2006 20:16, Christian Frommeyer wrote: Am Freitag 10 November 2006 19:54 schrieb Kevin Krammer: Which mailinglist did you test it with, maybe it sets itself as the reply-to address? I first realised the problem on a private list but its the same with e.g. debian-user-german. Sample headers below: [snipped headers] The reply-to is not set. I did a bit of experimentation and it seems that 'r' replies to the list if reply-to is absent, but uses reply-to if present Would be interesting to have an earlier version of KMail to check. Do you remember which version still worked the way you expected? Cheers, Kevin pgpVwOkBJy4QN.pgp Description: PGP signature
