Bug#421772: xserver-xorg: EDID takes precedance over DisplaySize
tag 421772 + patch forwarded 421772 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9758 found 421772 2:1.4.1~git20080131-1 stop The bug is still there. I've just posted a patch upstream. --- xorg-server-1.4.1~git20080131/hw/xfree86/modes/xf86EdidModes.c 2008-02-01 04:40:14.0 +0100 +++ xorg-server-1.4.1~git20080131/hw/xfree86/modes/xf86EdidModes.c 2008-02-28 12:16:00.725935688 +0100 @@ -407,8 +407,15 @@ Monitor-DDC = DDC; -Monitor-widthmm = 10 * DDC-features.hsize; -Monitor-heightmm = 10 * DDC-features.vsize; +/* + * Skip widthmm heightmm because xf86SetDpi assumes they contain + * values specified in the config file. Setting them now would break the + * DisplaySize option, and xf86SetDpi would never write to the log that + * DPI settings have been probed. + * + * Monitor-widthmm = 10 * DDC-features.hsize; + * Monitor-heightmm = 10 * DDC-features.vsize; + */ /* If this is a digital display, then we can use reduced blanking */ if (DDC-features.input_type)
Bug#421772: xserver-xorg: EDID takes precedance over DisplaySize
forwarded 421772 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10582 thank you Vincent Lönngren wrote: tis 2007-05-01 klockan 14:05 +0200 skrev Brice Goglin: You appear to be running a release candidate Xserver (1.2.99.903 is 1.3-rc3), is there any chance you try with the final release, aka xserver-xorg-core currently in unstable (2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-3)? Thanks, Brice Ok I just tried it, and the behaviour is the same. Looks like the upstream bug at the URL above. Brice
Bug#421772: xserver-xorg: EDID takes precedance over DisplaySize
Package: xserver-xorg Version: 1:7.1.0-18 Severity: normal Today I found that the EDID values are used instead of the values from the DisplaySize directive in xorg.conf. That's not how it used to be. Passing a -dpi argument to the server still overrides everything. -- Package-specific info: Contents of /var/lib/x11/X.roster: xserver-xorg /etc/X11/X target unchanged from checksum in /var/lib/x11/X.md5sum. X server symlink status: lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 2006-06-03 18:40 /etc/X11/X - /usr/bin/Xorg -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1707984 2007-03-27 08:09 /usr/bin/Xorg Contents of /var/lib/x11/xorg.conf.roster: xserver-xorg VGA-compatible devices on PCI bus: 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV5 [RIVA TNT2/TNT2 Pro] (rev 15) /etc/X11/xorg.conf does not match checksum in /var/lib/x11/xorg.conf.md5sum. Xorg X server configuration file status: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3139 2007-05-01 13:13 /etc/X11/xorg.conf Contents of /etc/X11/xorg.conf: # /etc/X11/xorg.conf (xorg X Window System server configuration file) # # This file was generated by dexconf, the Debian X Configuration tool, using # values from the debconf database. # # Edit this file with caution, and see the /etc/X11/xorg.conf manual page. # (Type man /etc/X11/xorg.conf at the shell prompt.) # # This file is automatically updated on xserver-xorg package upgrades *only* # if it has not been modified since the last upgrade of the xserver-xorg # package. # # If you have edited this file but would like it to be automatically updated # again, run the following command: # sudo dpkg-reconfigure -phigh xserver-xorg Section Files FontPath/usr/share/fonts/X11/misc FontPath/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc FontPath/usr/share/fonts/X11/cyrillic FontPath/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic FontPath/usr/share/fonts/X11/100dpi/:unscaled FontPath/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled FontPath/usr/share/fonts/X11/75dpi/:unscaled FontPath/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled FontPath/usr/share/fonts/X11/Type1 FontPath/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1 FontPath/usr/share/fonts/X11/100dpi FontPath/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi FontPath/usr/share/fonts/X11/75dpi FontPath/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi # path to defoma fonts FontPath/var/lib/defoma/x-ttcidfont-conf.d/dirs/TrueType #Skoj FontPath/usr/local/share/fonts/Type1/adobe/frutiger FontPath/usr/local/share/fonts/Type1/adobe/agaramond EndSection Section Module Loaddbe Loadddc Loadextmod Loadfreetype Loadglx Loadint10 Loadvbe EndSection Section InputDevice Identifier Generic Keyboard Driver kbd Option CoreKeyboard Option XkbRules xorg Option XkbModel pc105 Option XkbLayout se EndSection Section InputDevice Identifier Configured Mouse Driver mouse Option CorePointer Option Device/dev/input/mice Option Protocol ExplorerPS/2 EndSection Section Device Identifier nVidia Corporation NV5 [RIVA TNT2/TNT2 Pro] Driver nv BusID PCI:1:0:0 EndSection Section Monitor Identifier StudioWorks Option DPMS HorizSync 30-70 VertRefresh 50-160 Gamma 1.07 1.136 1.1 DisplaySize 325 244 EndSection Section Screen Identifier Default Screen Device nVidia Corporation NV5 [RIVA TNT2/TNT2 Pro] Monitor StudioWorks DefaultDepth24 SubSection Display Depth 1 Modes 1024x768 800x600 640x480 EndSubSection SubSection Display Depth 4 Modes 1024x768 800x600 640x480 EndSubSection SubSection Display Depth 8 Modes 1024x768 800x600 640x480 EndSubSection SubSection Display Depth 15 Modes 1024x768 800x600 640x480 EndSubSection SubSection Display Depth 16 Modes 1024x768 800x600 640x480 EndSubSection SubSection Display Depth 24 Modes 1024x768 800x600 640x480 EndSubSection EndSection Section ServerLayout Identifier Default Layout Screen Default Screen InputDevice Generic Keyboard InputDevice Configured Mouse EndSection
Bug#421772: xserver-xorg: EDID takes precedance over DisplaySize
reassign 421772 xserver-xorg-core found 421772 2:1.2.99.903-1 thank you Vincent Lönngren wrote: Today I found that the EDID values are used instead of the values from the DisplaySize directive in xorg.conf. That's not how it used to be. Passing a -dpi argument to the server still overrides everything. [...] ii xserver-xorg-core 2:1.2.99.903-1 X.Org X server -- core server You appear to be running a release candidate Xserver (1.2.99.903 is 1.3-rc3), is there any chance you try with the final release, aka xserver-xorg-core currently in unstable (2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-3)? Thanks, Brice
Bug#421772: xserver-xorg: EDID takes precedance over DisplaySize
tis 2007-05-01 klockan 14:05 +0200 skrev Brice Goglin: You appear to be running a release candidate Xserver (1.2.99.903 is 1.3-rc3), is there any chance you try with the final release, aka xserver-xorg-core currently in unstable (2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-3)? Thanks, Brice Ok I just tried it, and the behaviour is the same. -- Vincent Lönngren [EMAIL PROTECTED]