Bug#425680: closed by Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bug#426002: fixed in samba 3.0.25a-1)
The error, sadly, still persists. Our Gentoo boxes run flawless with the patch. Link to gentoo's bugzilla: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=179867 /var/log/syslog: May 28 10:51:28 chalenger smbd[2564]: domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user x in domain DOMAIN to Domain controller . Error was NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL. -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-686 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages samba depends on: ii debconf 1.5.11 Debian configuration management sy ii libacl1 2.2.41-1Access control list shared library ii libattr1 2.4.32-1Extended attribute shared library ii libc62.3.6.ds1-13GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libcomer 1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-2 common error description library ii libcupsy 1.2.7-4 Common UNIX Printing System(tm) - ii libgnutl 1.4.4-3 the GNU TLS library - runtime libr ii libkrb53 1.4.4-7etch1MIT Kerberos runtime libraries ii libldap2 2.1.30-13.3 OpenLDAP libraries ii libpam-m 0.79-4 Pluggable Authentication Modules f ii libpam-r 0.79-4 Runtime support for the PAM librar ii libpam0g 0.79-4 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libpopt0 1.10-3 lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii logrotat 3.7.1-3 Log rotation utility ii lsb-base 3.1-23.1Linux Standard Base 3.1 init scrip ii netbase 4.29Basic TCP/IP networking system ii procps 1:3.2.7-3 /proc file system utilities ii samba-co 3.0.24-6etch3 Samba common files used by both th ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-13 compression library - runtime Versions of packages samba recommends: pn smbldap-tools none (no description available) -- debconf information: samba/nmbd_from_inetd: * samba/run_mode: daemons samba/log_files_moved: samba/tdbsam: false * samba/generate_smbpasswd: true -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#425680: closed by Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bug#426002: fixed in samba 3.0.25a-1)
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 10:59:15AM +0200, Daniel Franganillo wrote: The error, sadly, still persists. With which version? You appear to be replying to the bug closure message resulting from the upload of samba 3.0.25a to Debian unstable, but you reported that you were running the version of samba from stable. Of course an upload to unstable hasn't fixed anything in stable. Our Gentoo boxes run flawless with the patch. With which patch? There are several floating around, including two different patches against 3.0.24 included in the upstream bug report. What we really need to know is if the packages at http://people.debian.org/~vorlon/samba/ fix this bug or not, so that we know whether we need to use the other upstream patch for the updated security release. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#425680: closed by Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bug#426002: fixed in samba 3.0.25a-1)
2007/5/28, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]: You appear to be replying to the bug closure message resulting from the upload of samba 3.0.25a to Debian unstable, but you reported that you were running the version of samba from stable. I just replied to the last message received in the bug report. Our Gentoo boxes run flawless with the patch. With which patch? There are several floating around, including two different patches against 3.0.24 included in the upstream bug report. What we really need to know is if the packages at http://people.debian.org/~vorlon/samba/ fix this bug or not, so that we know whether we need to use the other upstream patch for the updated security release. Please, read carefully my previous message. Regards. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#425680: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#425680: closed by Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bug#426002: fixed in samba 3.0.25a-1)
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 12:03:10PM +, Daniel Franganillo wrote: 2007/5/28, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]: You appear to be replying to the bug closure message resulting from the upload of samba 3.0.25a to Debian unstable, but you reported that you were running the version of samba from stable. I just replied to the last message received in the bug report. Our Gentoo boxes run flawless with the patch. With which patch? There are several floating around, including two different patches against 3.0.24 included in the upstream bug report. What we really need to know is if the packages at http://people.debian.org/~vorlon/samba/ fix this bug or not, so that we know whether we need to use the other upstream patch for the updated security release. Please, read carefully my previous message. Your message did not say that you were testing the etch3 binary packages. I see that the reportbug information included in your report mentions the etch3 version number, ok. I'll advise the security team to scrap the current build and will reroll with the full upstream patch. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
