Bug#425905: nscd: should it depend on libc6-amd64
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 01:48:24PM +1200, Andrew Ruthven wrote: Hi, The latest version of nscd (2.5-11) has the bogus dependency on libc6-amd65 again: Package: nscd Priority: optional Section: admin Installed-Size: 244 Maintainer: GNU Libc Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Architecture: i386 Source: glibc Version: 2.5-11 Depends: libc6-amd64 (= 2.5-5) it is a dpkg-shlibdeps bug, and should be sorted out at some point. The problem is known, and consequences are quite harmless, as what should appear is libc6 (= 2.5-5) and it happens that libc6-amd64 also neds libc6 (= 2.5-5). So it will be sorted out eventually. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O[EMAIL PROTECTED] OOOhttp://www.madism.org pgpqziLo2DJc8.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#425905: nscd: should it depend on libc6-amd64
Hi, The latest version of nscd (2.5-11) has the bogus dependency on libc6-amd65 again: Package: nscd Priority: optional Section: admin Installed-Size: 244 Maintainer: GNU Libc Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Architecture: i386 Source: glibc Version: 2.5-11 Depends: libc6-amd64 (= 2.5-5) ... Cheers! -- Andrew Ruthven, Wellington, New Zealand At home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | This space intentionally |left blank. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#425905: nscd: should it depend on libc6-amd64 ?
reassign 425905 dpkg-dev,nscd Daniel Jacobowitz a écrit : On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 11:17:10PM +0300, Wladimir Mutel wrote: I have K7 CPU. Lots of other my hosts have i686. Why upgrade to nscd 2.5-8 should bring libc6-amd64 with itself ? It doesn't even have a dependency on libc6 (non-amd64), so I think this must be a bug in the build process. This is a bug in dpkg-shlibdeps. -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#425905: nscd: should it depend on libc6-amd64 ?
Package: nscd Version: 2.5-8 Severity: normal Hi, I have K7 CPU. Lots of other my hosts have i686. Why upgrade to nscd 2.5-8 should bring libc6-amd64 with itself ? Are there really any benefits from this, even on x86_64 CPUs ? What is so performance-critical in nscd that wins from 64bit-optimized code ? Thank you in advance for your reactions. Hope to see this dependency removed or downgraded to suggests/recommends soon. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-k7 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=uk_UA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=uk_UA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages nscd depends on: ii libc6-amd64 2.5-8 GNU C Library: 64bit Shared librar nscd recommends no packages. -- debconf-show failed -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#425905: nscd: should it depend on libc6-amd64 ?
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 11:17:10PM +0300, Wladimir Mutel wrote: I have K7 CPU. Lots of other my hosts have i686. Why upgrade to nscd 2.5-8 should bring libc6-amd64 with itself ? It doesn't even have a dependency on libc6 (non-amd64), so I think this must be a bug in the build process. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
