Bug#427271: Bug#427260: am-utils: FTBFS: error: cannot find UTS_RELEASE in linux/version.h

2007-06-04 Thread Tim Cutts
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
 On 03/06/07 at 01:38 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
 On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 09:26:29AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
 On 02/06/07 at 23:17 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
 Hi Lucas,
 This was a bug in linux-libc-dev that has since been fixed.
 Actually, the bug in linux-libc-dev was #423462, but it was about
 LINUX_VERSION_CODE, not UTS_RELEASE. The full content of
 /usr/include/linux/version.h in linux-libc-dev is:
 #define LINUX_VERSION_CODE 132629
 #define KERNEL_VERSION(a,b,c) (((a)  16) + ((b)  8) + (c))
 So maybe UTS_RELEASE should be added to that file, and those bugs should
 be reassigned to linux-libc-dev. I've stopped filing bugs about those
 issues in the meantime.
 
 Actually:
 waldi UTS_RELEASE is not defined in version.h any longer.
 this is not a bug in the kernel
 waldi linux/utsrelease.h is the correct header now

OK, so are we now saying that this *is* an am-utils bug after all
(albeit a really annoying one since it looks like this is just a case of
 the kernel guys pulling the rug from under your feet)?

Tim


-- 
The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute is operated by Genome Research 
Limited, a charity registered in England with number 1021457 and a 
company registered in England with number 2742969, whose registered 
office is 215 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BE.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#427260: am-utils: FTBFS: error: cannot find UTS_RELEASE in linux/version.h

2007-06-04 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 04/06/07 at 09:21 +0100, Tim Cutts wrote:
 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
  On 03/06/07 at 01:38 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
  On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 09:26:29AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
  On 02/06/07 at 23:17 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
  Hi Lucas,
  This was a bug in linux-libc-dev that has since been fixed.
  Actually, the bug in linux-libc-dev was #423462, but it was about
  LINUX_VERSION_CODE, not UTS_RELEASE. The full content of
  /usr/include/linux/version.h in linux-libc-dev is:
  #define LINUX_VERSION_CODE 132629
  #define KERNEL_VERSION(a,b,c) (((a)  16) + ((b)  8) + (c))
  So maybe UTS_RELEASE should be added to that file, and those bugs should
  be reassigned to linux-libc-dev. I've stopped filing bugs about those
  issues in the meantime.
  
  Actually:
  waldi UTS_RELEASE is not defined in version.h any longer.
  this is not a bug in the kernel
  waldi linux/utsrelease.h is the correct header now
 
 OK, so are we now saying that this *is* an am-utils bug after all
 
I think so.
-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#427260: am-utils: FTBFS: error: cannot find UTS_RELEASE in linux/version.h

2007-06-03 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
reopen 427260
reopen 427271
thanks

On 02/06/07 at 23:17 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
 Hi Lucas,
 
 This was a bug in linux-libc-dev that has since been fixed.
 
Hi Steve,

Actually, the bug in linux-libc-dev was #423462, but it was about
LINUX_VERSION_CODE, not UTS_RELEASE. The full content of
/usr/include/linux/version.h in linux-libc-dev is:

#define LINUX_VERSION_CODE 132629
#define KERNEL_VERSION(a,b,c) (((a)  16) + ((b)  8) + (c))

So maybe UTS_RELEASE should be added to that file, and those bugs should
be reassigned to linux-libc-dev. I've stopped filing bugs about those
issues in the meantime.

Thank you,
-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#427260: am-utils: FTBFS: error: cannot find UTS_RELEASE in linux/version.h

2007-06-02 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Package: am-utils
version: 6.1.5-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on i386

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.

Relevant part:
appending configuration tag CXX to libtool
checking for ld used by g++... /usr/bin/ld
checking if the linker (/usr/bin/ld) is GNU ld... yes
checking whether the g++ linker (/usr/bin/ld) supports shared libraries... yes
checking for g++ option to produce PIC... -fPIC
checking if g++ PIC flag -fPIC works... yes
checking if g++ supports -c -o file.o... yes
checking whether the g++ linker (/usr/bin/ld) supports shared libraries... yes
checking dynamic linker characteristics... GNU/Linux ld.so
checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate
checking whether stripping libraries is possible... yes
appending configuration tag F77 to libtool
configure: *** EXTRA OPTION PROCESSING ***
checking additional preprocessor flags... 
checking additional compiler flags... 
checking additional linker flags... 
configure: *** UNIX VARIANTS ***
checking host headers version... 
configure: error: cannot find UTS_RELEASE in linux/version.h.
  This Linux system may be misconfigured or unconfigured!
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 1

The full build log is available from
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2007/05/22/

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot containing a sid i386
environment.  Internet was not accessible from the build systems.
-- 
Lucas Nussbaum

-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]