Bug#431931: Bug#454498: status update?

2010-11-23 Thread Ondřej Surý
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 23:00, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
h...@debian.org wrote:
 On Sun, 21 Nov 2010, Costin Gusa wrote:
 Is it ok to ask here about including uoa.gr autocreate/autosieve
 patches or should I file a bug against the newly 2.4.4? (I just found
 them prepared for 2.4.4 here:

 Unless one of the other Cyrus maintainers overrides me, those will be
 added only after they get merged upstream.

That won't be me. I'm with hmh on that issue. I consider those patches
too invasive to be included in stock Debian installation (no need to
argue with me).

Ondrej
-- 
Ondřej Surý ond...@sury.org



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#431931: Bug#454498: status update?

2010-11-23 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010, Ondřej Surý wrote:
 On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 23:00, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
 h...@debian.org wrote:
  On Sun, 21 Nov 2010, Costin Gusa wrote:
  Is it ok to ask here about including uoa.gr autocreate/autosieve
  patches or should I file a bug against the newly 2.4.4? (I just found
  them prepared for 2.4.4 here:
 
  Unless one of the other Cyrus maintainers overrides me, those will be
  added only after they get merged upstream.
 
 That won't be me. I'm with hmh on that issue. I consider those patches
 too invasive to be included in stock Debian installation (no need to
 argue with me).

Two votes against, then.

That said, it *is* being merged upstream, but I understand there are a
few problems still, and it might end up being targeted to a future 2.5
branch.

I *really* don't want to ever deal with bugs about bad interaction of
those patches and a murder cluster that uses online replication...

-- 
  One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie. -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#431931: Bug#454498: status update?

2010-11-22 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010, Costin Gusa wrote:
 Is it ok to ask here about including uoa.gr autocreate/autosieve
 patches or should I file a bug against the newly 2.4.4? (I just found
 them prepared for 2.4.4 here:

Unless one of the other Cyrus maintainers overrides me, those will be
added only after they get merged upstream.

-- 
  One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie. -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#431931: Bug#454498: status update?

2010-11-21 Thread Costin Gusa
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 20:21, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
h...@debian.org wrote:
 On Fri, 19 Nov 2010, Costin Gusa wrote:
 It's almost a year since last message on this list, squeeze is frozen,
 cyrus stable is already 2.4.4.

 2.4.4 is in experimental.

 Sadly, this makes me wonder not if we will see cyrus-2.3 in
 testing/experimental, but if we EVER will have a modern cyrus back in

 No, we have decided to skip 2.3 entirely.  I am not junking the 2.3.16
 packages until I move production to 2.4 (which I won't do until 2.4 is a lot
 more stable), so either I or someone else might decide to maintain 2.3, and
 bring the upload 2.3 to unstable issue back to the table.

 But neither 2.3 or 2.4 are going in for squeeze, except as a
 (fully-supported) backports later on (I for one will need it).


Thank you for the update. Actually I have sent the question without
checking pkg-cyrus-imapd-debian-devel@ first, which would have given
me the answer :)

As long as we have something newer, it's fine. Probably the OP wanted
the same thing at the moment of creating the bug and not necessarily a
specific version.

Is it ok to ask here about including uoa.gr autocreate/autosieve
patches or should I file a bug against the newly 2.4.4? (I just found
them prepared for 2.4.4 here:
http://www.vx.sk/download/patches/cyrus-imapd/)



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org