Bug#434050: textpattern: Proposes to configure obsolete web server packages
OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du samedi 21 juillet 2007, vers 17:08, Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait: Another question related to this bug: do we really want to drop support for web servers that are not in Debian any more? I didn't find any discussion related to this. Well, I doubt you can easily and safely configure web server that have not been installed with the Debian package, so yes. Just a note to let you know that I have asked for advice in debian-webapps. I would like to find another web server to configure to keep at least two choices and avoiding to reword the question (and having to reword it again when a new popular web server will appear). So I am waiting for some feedback. :) -- BOFH excuse #138: BNC (brain not (user brain not connected)
Bug#434050: textpattern: Proposes to configure obsolete web server packages
Package: textpattern Severity: normal There are no more apache, apache-ssl and apache-perl packages in unstable. Therefore, the debconf question about web server to configure is obsolete. That question (which you introduced without a call for translations which would have shown the problem) should be removed. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.21-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#434050: textpattern: Proposes to configure obsolete web server packages
OoO En ce doux début de matinée du samedi 21 juillet 2007, vers 08:59, Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait: There are no more apache, apache-ssl and apache-perl packages in unstable. Therefore, the debconf question about web server to configure is obsolete. That question (which you introduced without a call for translations which would have shown the problem) should be removed. Hi Christian ! How should I do a call for translation ? The Debian Developer's Reference seems outdated on this issue. Which document describes this process ? Are you aware of a package that already migrated from multiple Apache configuration to Apache 2 only configuration and that have used debian-l10n-english to validate the template ? Packages that I know still configure multiple Apache (roundcube, zabbix). -- BOFH excuse #15: temporary routing anomoly
Bug#434050: textpattern: Proposes to configure obsolete web server packages
OoO En ce doux début de matinée du samedi 21 juillet 2007, vers 08:59, Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait: There are no more apache, apache-ssl and apache-perl packages in unstable. Therefore, the debconf question about web server to configure is obsolete. That question (which you introduced without a call for translations which would have shown the problem) should be removed. Another question related to this bug: do we really want to drop support for web servers that are not in Debian any more? I didn't find any discussion related to this. -- Indent to show the logical structure of a program. - The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan Plauger)
Bug#434050: textpattern: Proposes to configure obsolete web server packages
How should I do a call for translation ? The Debian Developer's Reference seems outdated on this issue. Which document describes this Yeah, I know. Basically, this is just using the podebconf-report-po command. See its manpage. process ? Are you aware of a package that already migrated from multiple Apache configuration to Apache 2 only configuration and that have used debian-l10n-english to validate the template ? Packages that I know still configure multiple Apache (roundcube, zabbix). We recently had one. I don't remember which one. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#434050: textpattern: Proposes to configure obsolete web server packages
OoO Pendant le temps de midi du samedi 21 juillet 2007, vers 12:57, Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait: process ? Are you aware of a package that already migrated from multiple Apache configuration to Apache 2 only configuration and that have used debian-l10n-english to validate the template ? Packages that I know still configure multiple Apache (roundcube, zabbix). We recently had one. I don't remember which one. I have looked at debian-l10n-english and found the following webapps: - mantis - mediawiki Both of them still propose to configure multiple version of Apache. There is also myphpmoney but this one doesn't propose specifically to configure a web server. -- printk(KERN_ERR msp3400: chip reset failed, penguin on i2c bus?\n); 2.2.16 /usr/src/linux/drivers/char/msp3400.c
Bug#434050: textpattern: Proposes to configure obsolete web server packages
Quoting Vincent Bernat ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Another question related to this bug: do we really want to drop support for web servers that are not in Debian any more? I didn't find any discussion related to this. Well, I doubt you can easily and safely configure web server that have not been installed with the Debian package, so yes. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#434050: textpattern: Proposes to configure obsolete web server packages
OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du samedi 21 juillet 2007, vers 17:08, Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait: Another question related to this bug: do we really want to drop support for web servers that are not in Debian any more? I didn't find any discussion related to this. Well, I doubt you can easily and safely configure web server that have not been installed with the Debian package, so yes. I was thinking to backports (even if then, the package could be modified) or for people that have installed Apache before Debian package was uninstalled. But I agree with you that this is a very tiny case. -- panic(bad_user_access_length executed (not cool, dude)); 2.0.38 /usr/src/linux/kernel/panic.c
