Bug#449875: Reconsider the removal
Hi, On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 07:32:51PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote: So I'm asking you to reconsider your decision and include the working watch file on your next upload rather than removing it. You are of course right - I thought upstream would only drop in the file without a version - a new package is just being built - sorry for being so annoying. Cheers, -- Guido -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#449875: Reconsider the removal
Hi, The watch file sent to this report does work, and since you are using the same version numbering as upstream I don't see any reason why you are removing the watch file on the next upload. Upstream doesn't have a version number in the tarballs name Your package's upstream download directory looks like: nss_updatedb-4.tar.gz 15-Mar-2006 11:06 63K nss_updatedb-4.tar.gz 15-Mar-2006 11:06 63K nss_updatedb-5.tar.gz 05-May-2006 16:18 63K nss_updatedb-6.tar.gz 17-May-2006 16:44 63K nss_updatedb-7.tar.gz 13-Nov-2006 22:37 63K nss_updatedb-8.tar.gz 27-Oct-2007 10:43 95K Which work just fine with uscan and the watch file I submitted on my previous message. So I'm asking you to reconsider your decision and include the working watch file on your next upload rather than removing it. Sincerely, -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
