Bug#452574: [Pkg-hpijs-devel] Bug#452574: spurious version numbering for hpijs packages
Hello, Am Samstag, den 01.12.2007, 10:03 +0100 schrieb Mark Purcell: Thanks for your report. You're welcome! As you maybe aware we have a large amount of fixes to get hplip into a stable state before I would be happy for release with Debian. The consistency of version numbers whilst a presentation issue, doesn't detract from the functionality so will be looked at, but with a low priority. AFAICT you are doing a very good job in maintaining hplip. Thank you very much for that! I will do my best and support your work by writing bug reports on each and every issue I encounter. Of course the current one (consistency of the version numbers) is somewhere between wishlist and minor (I hope I set the severity appropriately). ;) Cheers, Fabian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#452574: [Pkg-hpijs-devel] Bug#452574: spurious version numbering for hpijs packages
On Friday 23 November 2007, Fabian Greffrath wrote: Since version 2.7.x, both hplip and hpijs do have the same version number, making combined version numbers like '2.7.10+2.7.10-2' redundant. Additionally, it looks silly. ;) Please consider introducing a consistent version number for all hplip and hpijs related packages. Fabian, Thanks for your report. As you maybe aware we have a large amount of fixes to get hplip into a stable state before I would be happy for release with Debian. The consistency of version numbers whilst a presentation issue, doesn't detract from the functionality so will be looked at, but with a low priority. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
