Bug#455081: Time for upgrade or new package

[Nicolas Spalinger]

reassign 455081 ttf-sil-gentium-basic
thanks


Yes, Gentium Basic needs to go into a new package as the two fonts are
released separately upstream and have different usage scenarios.

I will take care of that.


-- 
Nicolas Spalinger
http://scripts.sil.org
http://pkg-fonts.alioth.debian.org
https://launchpad.net/people/fonts



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#455081: Time for upgrade or new package

[Nicolas Spalinger]

reassign 455081 wnpp
thanks

Ooops, reassigning to the right package.



-- 
Nicolas Spalinger
http://scripts.sil.org
http://pkg-fonts.alioth.debian.org
https://launchpad.net/people/fonts





signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#455081: Time for upgrade or new package

[Juhapekka Tolvanen]

Package: ttf-sil-gentium
Version: 1.02+dfsg-4
Severity: wishlist


SIL has released more font families in their Gentium fonts. Unlike
former Gentium fonts, bold versions are provided too. Those new font
familiess are called Gentium Basic and Gentium Book Basic. Both families
include regular, italic, bold and bold italic weights. They are still
beta-version, but maybe they will get more testers, if they are
available as Debian-packages, too.

http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsiitem_id=Gentium_basic_sc=1


-- Package-specific info:
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name   VersionDescription
+++-==-==-
ii  fontconfig 2.5.0-2generic font configuration library - support
ii  libfreetype6   2.3.5-1+b1 FreeType 2 font engine, shared library files
ii  libxft22.1.12-2   FreeType-based font drawing library for X

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (1100, 'testing'), (990, 'stable'), (500, 
'testing-proposed-updates'), (500, 'proposed-updates'), (101, 'testing'), (99, 
'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-3-k7 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=fi_FI.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages ttf-sil-gentium depends on:
ii  defoma   0.11.10-0.1 Debian Font Manager -- automatic f

ttf-sil-gentium recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
Juhapekka naula Tolvanen * http colon slash slash iki dot fi slash juhtolv
eiga wo miyou kimi no yakusoku dohri te wo tsunai de. yoru ni wa owakare
desu ringo to ichigo ga kusaru mae ni. yume wa hirogaru kimi no yakusoku
dohri kisu wo shi nagara.   Dir en grey



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#455081: Time for upgrade or new package

[Gürkan Sengün]

On 2007-12-08 23:38:45 +0100 Juhapekka Tolvanen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Package: ttf-sil-gentium
Version: 1.02+dfsg-4
Severity: wishlist

SIL has released more font families in their Gentium fonts. Unlike
former Gentium fonts, bold versions are provided too. Those new font
familiess are called Gentium Basic and Gentium Book Basic. Both 
families

include regular, italic, bold and bold italic weights. They are still
beta-version, but maybe they will get more testers, if they are
available as Debian-packages, too.


I'm subscribed to their news. The point is that I don't know if this 
should
go into the existing ttf-sil-gentium package or not. There's already 
another

ITP for a new package at #451201.

Nicolas, what do you think? New package or shall I integrate both into
this one?


http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsiitem_id=Gentium_basic_sc=1


Guerkan

--
while(!asleep()) sheep++;




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]