Bug#471354: [Pkg-gnutls-maint] Bug#471354: closed by Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#471354: libgnutls13: gnutls13=1.4.4-3 causes pam_ldap failures based on transfer size)

2008-04-15 Thread Chris Adams


On Mar 17, 2008, at 6:54 PM, Simon Josefsson wrote:
Can we check whether my workaround will be included in pam_ldap  
first?
Otherwise we're in the situation where some users will not be able  
to

authenticate against LDAP without any obvious reason.


Hello,
well I will just wait for a negative answer from you.

Do you think this is severe enough to try to get a stable update in?


Have you identified what fixes the problem?  To me it sounds like the
decompression-leads-to-larger-output-than-input problem that was fixed
some time ago.



This is probably correct - pulling in the libgnutls from testing also  
fixes the problem. In that case I'm going to try to get my workaround  
in libpam-ldap since fixing libgnutls would be a lot more work.


Chris

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Bug#471354: [Pkg-gnutls-maint] Bug#471354: closed by Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#471354: libgnutls13: gnutls13=1.4.4-3 causes pam_ldap failures based on transfer size)

2008-03-18 Thread Simon Josefsson
Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On 2008-03-17 Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Mar 17, 2008, at 2:24 PM, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>> >>Upgrading to the version in testing solves the problem.
>> >
>> >Ok. I am marking the bug as fixed in that version. Since this is not
>> >rc (speak up if you disagree), that is probably going to be the only
>> >action I am taking.
>
>> Can we check whether my workaround will be included in pam_ldap first?  
>> Otherwise we're in the situation where some users will not be able to  
>> authenticate against LDAP without any obvious reason.
>
> Hello,
> well I will just wait for a negative answer from you.
>
> Do you think this is severe enough to try to get a stable update in?

Have you identified what fixes the problem?  To me it sounds like the
decompression-leads-to-larger-output-than-input problem that was fixed
some time ago.

/Simon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#471354: closed by Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#471354: libgnutls13: gnutls13=1.4.4-3 causes pam_ldap failures based on transfer size)

2008-03-18 Thread Chris Adams


On Mar 17, 2008, at 2:24 PM, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:

Upgrading to the version in testing solves the problem.


Ok. I am marking the bug as fixed in that version. Since this is not
rc (speak up if you disagree), that is probably going to be the only
action I am taking.


Can we check whether my workaround will be included in pam_ldap first?  
Otherwise we're in the situation where some users will not be able to  
authenticate against LDAP without any obvious reason.


Chris

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Bug#471354: closed by Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#471354: libgnutls13: gnutls13=1.4.4-3 causes pam_ldap failures based on transfer size)

2008-03-18 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2008-03-17 Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Mar 17, 2008, at 2:24 PM, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> >>Upgrading to the version in testing solves the problem.
> >
> >Ok. I am marking the bug as fixed in that version. Since this is not
> >rc (speak up if you disagree), that is probably going to be the only
> >action I am taking.

> Can we check whether my workaround will be included in pam_ldap first?  
> Otherwise we're in the situation where some users will not be able to  
> authenticate against LDAP without any obvious reason.

Hello,
well I will just wait for a negative answer from you.

Do you think this is severe enough to try to get a stable update in?
cu andreas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]