Bug#472279: Bug#464902: Bug#472279: elog: should this package be removed?

2008-04-17 Thread Raphael Geissert
On Thursday 03 April 2008, HOLZER Martin wrote:
 In case this package gets removed,
 Where can i find the obsolete files to build the package using dpkg ?

You can always get it from snapshots.d.n:
http://snapshot.debian.net/package/elog/



 
 Wiener Linien GmbH  Co KG, A-1031 Wien, Erdbergstraße 202, Postfach 63
 FN 181593z, Handelsgericht Wien, DVR: 0992739, UID-Nr. ATU 47055001,
 www.wienerlinien.at Bankverbindung: Bank Austria Creditanstalt, BLZ 12000,
 Konto Nr. 696 216 209, Linie U3 (Station Erdberg)


Cheers,
-- 
Atomo64 - Raphael

Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Bug#472279: Bug#464902: Bug#472279: elog: should this package be removed?

2008-04-03 Thread HOLZER Martin

In case this package gets removed,
Where can i find the obsolete files to build the package using dpkg ?



-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Raphael Geissert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. April 2008 02:47
An: Recai Oktaş
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Nico Golde; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Bug#464902: Bug#472279: elog: should this package be removed?

Hello Recai, Nico,

On Monday 31 March 2008, Recai Oktaş wrote:
 [Also CC'ing to Nico... I've just noticed the response at #464902.]

 Sorry for the late response!  I had already filed a bug report to 
 orphan
 elog: #464902.  However removing this package from the archives is 
 also fine with me, unless someone willing to maintain it comes up.

Thanks for your reply; I'll wait about a month for anyone to come up and adopt 
elog (Nico: unless the testing/ security team really doesn't want to see this 
package in the archive any longer :). If after a month nobody shows up I'll 
then request its removal.


 Best regards,

Kind regards,
--
Atomo64 - Raphael

Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html



--
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Wiener Linien GmbH  Co KG, A-1031 Wien, Erdbergstraße 202, Postfach 63
FN 181593z, Handelsgericht Wien, DVR: 0992739, UID-Nr. ATU 47055001, 
www.wienerlinien.at
Bankverbindung: Bank Austria Creditanstalt, BLZ 12000, Konto Nr. 696 216 209, 
Linie U3 (Station Erdberg)




Bug#464902: Bug#472279: elog: should this package be removed?

2008-04-03 Thread Nico Golde
Hi Raphael,
* Raphael Geissert [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-03 10:50]:
 On Monday 31 March 2008, Recai Okta?? wrote:
  [Also CC'ing to Nico... I've just noticed the response at #464902.]
 
  Sorry for the late response!  I had already filed a bug report to orphan
  elog: #464902.  However removing this package from the archives is also
  fine with me, unless someone willing to maintain it comes up.
 
 Thanks for your reply; I'll wait about a month for anyone to come up and 
 adopt 
 elog (Nico: unless the testing/ security team really doesn't want to see this 
 package in the archive any longer :). If after a month nobody shows up I'll 
 then request its removal.

No sure this bug is there since quite some time, waiting for 
a month seems fine.
Kind regards
Nico
-- 
Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.


pgpZiWzxyTrIS.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#464902: Bug#472279: elog: should this package be removed?

2008-04-02 Thread Raphael Geissert
Hello Recai, Nico,

On Monday 31 March 2008, Recai Oktaş wrote:
 [Also CC'ing to Nico... I've just noticed the response at #464902.]

 Sorry for the late response!  I had already filed a bug report to orphan
 elog: #464902.  However removing this package from the archives is also
 fine with me, unless someone willing to maintain it comes up.

Thanks for your reply; I'll wait about a month for anyone to come up and adopt 
elog (Nico: unless the testing/ security team really doesn't want to see this 
package in the archive any longer :). If after a month nobody shows up I'll 
then request its removal.


 Best regards,

Kind regards,
-- 
Atomo64 - Raphael

Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html




Bug#472279: elog: should this package be removed?

2008-03-31 Thread Recai Oktaş
[Also CC'ing to Nico... I've just noticed the response at #464902.]

* Raphael Geissert [2008-03-22 20:37:35-0600]
 Source: elog
 Version: 2.6.3+r1764-1
 Severity: serious
 User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Usertags: proposed-removal
 
 Hi,
 
 While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible
 candidate for removal from Debian, because:
 
  * It has a RC bug
  * It has a history of security issues
  * last maintainer upload was on 2006
  * It has almost no users
  * It is not part of etch and, as for now, won't be part of lenny
  * There's a new upstream release that is said to address the RC bug
 
 If you think that it should be orphaned instead of being removed from
 Debian, please reply to this bug and tell so.

Sorry for the late response!  I had already filed a bug report to orphan
elog: #464902.  However removing this package from the archives is also
fine with me, unless someone willing to maintain it comes up.

Best regards,

-- 
roktas


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#472279: elog: should this package be removed?

2008-03-22 Thread Raphael Geissert
Source: elog
Version: 2.6.3+r1764-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: proposed-removal

Hi,

While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible
candidate for removal from Debian, because:

 * It has a RC bug
 * It has a history of security issues
 * last maintainer upload was on 2006
 * It has almost no users
 * It is not part of etch and, as for now, won't be part of lenny
 * There's a new upstream release that is said to address the RC bug

If you think that it should be orphaned instead of being removed from
Debian, please reply to this bug and tell so.

If you agree, sending the following commands to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
should do it (after replacing nn with this bug's number):
severity nn normal
reassign nn ftp.debian.org
retitle nn RM: packagename -- RoM; reasons 
thanks

For more information, see
http://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals
http://ftp-master.debian.org/removals.txt

If you disagree and want to continue to maintain this package, please
just close this bug, preferably in an upload also fixing the other
issues.

Thank you,
-- 
Atomo64 - Raphael

Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]