Bug#476789: [Debian-olpc-devel] Bug#476789: sugar: fails to find icon system-search

2008-04-21 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 01:36:25PM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote:
Success! Sugar depends on librsvg2-common for its `gdk-pixbuf loader 
and a GTK+ engine, allowing to load SVG images transparently inside 
GTK+ applications'.

But of course.  I already knew that from my initial careful reading 
_all_ source to resolve dependencies.  Why on Earth did I then miss 
adding that dependency...?!?

Thanks a lot - I'll add it now for the upcoming release for Sid.


Would you perhaps be interested in joining our team at Alioth?  We could 
relly use some help packaging Sugar activities...


Why does sugar only recommend sugar-artwork? It seems to be rather 
dependent on it.

Because I believe Sugar works without it, and can imagine odd situations 
where it could make sense to not need it.


  - Jonas

- -- 
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

  - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFIDFKcn7DbMsAkQLgRAssvAJ9VEYh9Fwcnz5Hp/4wJVaolpectLgCfavTb
Gnp2gR1/STY1PVvTlWCpy98=
=uZoj
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Bug#476789: [Debian-olpc-devel] Bug#476789: sugar: fails to find icon system-search

2008-04-21 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 01:36:25PM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote:
Success! Sugar depends on librsvg2-common for its `gdk-pixbuf loader 
and a GTK+ engine, allowing to load SVG images transparently inside 
GTK+ applications'.

Ahem, forget my earlier remark: I misread your posting above (I really 
need to read closer before repying, I guess) and have actually never 
before found the need for librscg2-coomon, only for python-rsvg which 
is provided by python-gnome2-desktop.

Good catch!  I imagine it would have taken me very long to resolve that 
myself.

Could you perhaps share some insight about how you went about?  Any 
tools or tricks I could use in future cases like this?


  - Jonas


- -- 
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

  - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFIDFWjn7DbMsAkQLgRAlMyAJwPfdChtschKzLcgyhD/vTgZoNNJwCgiJl+
Q+17utXu8OGYHQGotmbbljc=
=fWUn
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Bug#476789: [Debian-olpc-devel] Bug#476789: sugar: fails to find icon system-search

2008-04-21 Thread Shaun Jackman
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 1:51 AM, Jonas Smedegaard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
  Could you perhaps share some insight about how you went about?  Any
  tools or tricks I could use in future cases like this?

Unfortunately, it was just dumb look. I had the idea that perhaps GTK
needed a plugin to provide SVG support. So, I used apt-cache pkgnames
and grepped for gtk.*svg|svg.*gtk but came up with nothing. Later that
day, I installeed pychess -- for which I'm thinking about creating a
sugar activity -- and noticed it depended on librsvg2-common:

This package includes the gdk-pixbuf loader and a GTK+ engine,
allowing to load SVG images transparently inside GTK+ applications.

Like I said, dumb luck.

Cheers,
Shaun



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#476789: [Debian-olpc-devel] Bug#476789: sugar: fails to find icon system-search

2008-04-20 Thread Shaun Jackman
Success! Sugar depends on librsvg2-common for its `gdk-pixbuf loader
and a GTK+ engine, allowing to load SVG images transparently inside
GTK+ applications'.

Why does sugar only recommend sugar-artwork? It seems to be rather
dependent on it.

Cheers,
Shaun

On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Jonas Smedegaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 12:12:02PM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote:
  I do have sugar-artwork 0.79.2-1 installed. If you scroll down to the
  bottom of the bug report, you can see the versions of all the
  dependencies that I have installed: http://bugs.debian.org/476789

  Ah, yes. Sorry - I was responding too fast.

  Afterwards I even tried removing sugar-artwork in an attempt at
  provoking that same error, but couldn't.

  I will try harder...



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#476789: [Debian-olpc-devel] Bug#476789: sugar: fails to find icon system-search

2008-04-19 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi shaun,

On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 12:09:57AM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote:

Both sugar and sugar-emulator fail:
AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'get_filename'

Thanks for the bugreport!

I suspect the cause of this is sugar-artwork missing.  Could you please 
check if you have sugar-artwork installed, and if not see if doing so 
makes the error go away.


  - Jonas

- -- 
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

  - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFICbd2n7DbMsAkQLgRAv+dAJ99xx8TJt/G8TzNeNLYiApvYYf/MACfSv26
P5hnm9mTPv9Dznn2oFdbabI=
=b9KI
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Bug#476789: [Debian-olpc-devel] Bug#476789: sugar: fails to find icon system-search

2008-04-19 Thread Shaun Jackman
Hi Jonas,

I do have sugar-artwork 0.79.2-1 installed. If you scroll down to the
bottom of the bug report, you can see the versions of all the
dependencies that I have installed:
http://bugs.debian.org/476789

Cheers,
Shaun

On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 2:12 AM, Jonas Smedegaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hi shaun,

  On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 12:09:57AM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote:

  Both sugar and sugar-emulator fail:
  AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'get_filename'

  Thanks for the bugreport!

  I suspect the cause of this is sugar-artwork missing.  Could you please
  check if you have sugar-artwork installed, and if not see if doing so
  makes the error go away.


   - Jonas



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]