Bug#488384: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#488384: Bug#488384: samba: Missing ldb admin tools in 3.2 packages

2008-06-30 Thread Christian Perrier 
Quoting Jelmer Vernooij ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):

  Is the ldb/tools code in samba 3.2 source tree the same codebase? 
 Yeah, like tdb and talloc, the ldb source code is shared (and regularly
 synced) between the two versions.

OK, then closing with Suggests: ldb-tools for samba seems fair, then.

 
 ldb probably should be team-maintained if samba is going to recommend /
 suggest it.


Well, if this is Suggests I don't really see the need ;



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#488384: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#488384: Bug#488384: samba: Missing ldb admin tools in 3.2 packages

2008-06-29 Thread Jelmer Vernooij 
Am Sonntag, den 29.06.2008, 10:32 +0200 schrieb Christian Perrier:
 Quoting Jelmer Vernooij ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
   And we could have samba Suggests:  samba-tools if ldb tools are
   important to manage Samba 3.2 servers.
  These tools are already packaged in the ldb-tools packaged. What about
  just suggesting that package?
 (ldb-tools being a binary package built by the ldb source package,
 maintained by Jelmer himself)
 
 If I understand well, the ldb package is code from the Samba4
 development tree.
 
 Is the ldb/tools code in samba 3.2 source tree the same codebase? 
Yeah, like tdb and talloc, the ldb source code is shared (and regularly
synced) between the two versions.

ldb probably should be team-maintained if samba is going to recommend /
suggest it.

Cheers,

Jelmer
-- 
Jelmer Vernooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://samba.org/~jelmer/
Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]