Bug#488386: please provide an udeb for laptop-detect

2016-12-24 Thread Philipp Kern
On 24.12.2016 16:24, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Christoph Biedl]
>> Um, Jan 5th (i.e. upload by tomorrow-ish) is about uploads that are
>> NEW or about re-entry. Neither applies for laptop-detect, so deadline
>> is *Feb* 5th minus ten days for migration. Or I misread the message
>> horribly.
> Adding the udeb back to laptop-detect will require NEW processing.

As the referenced mail mentions, this is generally about source
packages. Not speaking for -boot here, but in general terms. Britney
will continue to propagate new binary packages when migrating new
versions to testing. The release team has historically asked for some
updates not to be released from NEW, but that was mostly to avoid
uncoordinated transitions.

Kind regards
Philipp Kern



Bug#488386: please provide an udeb for laptop-detect

2016-12-24 Thread Christoph Biedl
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote...

> [Christoph Biedl]
> > Um, Jan 5th (i.e. upload by tomorrow-ish) is about uploads that are
> > NEW or about re-entry. Neither applies for laptop-detect, so deadline
> > is *Feb* 5th minus ten days for migration. Or I misread the message
> > horribly.
> 
> Adding the udeb back to laptop-detect will require NEW processing.

I stand corrected. So it's too late for stretch, too bad.

Christoph


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#488386: please provide an udeb for laptop-detect

2016-12-24 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Christoph Biedl]
> Um, Jan 5th (i.e. upload by tomorrow-ish) is about uploads that are
> NEW or about re-entry. Neither applies for laptop-detect, so deadline
> is *Feb* 5th minus ten days for migration. Or I misread the message
> horribly.

Adding the udeb back to laptop-detect will require NEW processing.

--
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen



Bug#488386: please provide an udeb for laptop-detect

2016-12-24 Thread Christoph Biedl
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote...

> [Christoph Biedl]
> > Now that laptop-detect has been orphaned I intend to do a QA upload in
> > about a week (aiming for stretch).
> 
> Good to hear you are on the case.
> 
> But according to
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2016/12/msg0.html >
> uploads done in less than two days will have little chance of reaching
> Stretch.  You might want to take that into account.

Um, Jan 5th (i.e. upload by tomorrow-ish) is about uploads that are
NEW or about re-entry. Neither applies for laptop-detect, so deadline
is *Feb* 5th minus ten days for migration. Or I misread the message
horribly.

Christoph


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#488386: please provide an udeb for laptop-detect

2016-12-24 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Christoph Biedl]
> Now that laptop-detect has been orphaned I intend to do a QA upload in
> about a week (aiming for stretch).

Good to hear you are on the case.

But according to
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2016/12/msg0.html >
uploads done in less than two days will have little chance of reaching
Stretch.  You might want to take that into account.
-- 
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen



Bug#488386: please provide an udeb for laptop-detect

2016-12-24 Thread Christoph Biedl
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote...

> Is it still unclear why Debian Edu need the laptop-detect-udeb package?
> Can we please have it back, to allow us to drop our copy from the
> debian-edu-install package?

Now that laptop-detect has been orphaned I intend to do a QA upload in
about a week (aiming for stretch). So I found this old issue, it seems
sound, but I'm not sure whether it's is on the agenda, especially
since the related but #487404 was closed in the meantime.

Additionally, since Frans Pop stated in <200806281743.44118.elen...@planet.nl>:

| Also, adding a udeb is not up to Otavio as laptop-detect maintainer. Any 
| new udeb needs to be approved by the D-I team and thus discussed on the 
| debian-boot list.

... a few mails were sent to debian-boot@ as well but AFAICS without a
reaction. So any ACK/NACK from their side is appriciated as well.

Christoph


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#488386: please provide an udeb for laptop-detect

2014-09-19 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen

Is it still unclear why Debian Edu need the laptop-detect-udeb package?
Can we please have it back, to allow us to drop our copy from the
debian-edu-install package?

-- 
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#488386: please provide an udeb for laptop-detect

2012-02-10 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen

[Otavio Salvador 2008-06-28]
 OK, that could be a valid reason. But you've not yet explained why you 
 need it _before_ /target is set up.
 
 I also fail to understand it.

I'll try to give some more background information.

During installation of Debian Edu, a profile question is presented to
the user, and based on the answer to thise profile question a lot of
settings in the installer is adjusted.  The package selection, setup and
the partitioning are all affected by the answer.  Because the
partitioing is affected, the profile question need to be asked _before_
/target/ is available.

When the profile question is asked, the default values are adjusted
depending on the environment and the type of machine being installed.
If installing in an environment without a main-server and on non-laptop
hardware, the default is main-server + thin-client-server.  If
installing in the same environment on a laptop, the default is
standalone.  If installing in an environment _with_ a main-server and on
a non-laptop, the default is workstation.  If installing in an
environment with a main-server present and on a laptop, the default is
roaming workstation.

To get this automatic setup working, we need laptop-detect in d-i.

Please provide the udeb, to allow us to drop our copy of the
laptop-detect in debian-edu-install.
-- 
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org