Bug#490247: cdd-dev: Data from official package should take precedence on manually filed data in task file
Hi Frederic (and others), I just want to mention that in the log file /srv/alioth.debian.org/chroot/home/groups/cdd/webtools/logs/debian-science.out those packages are mentioned that have resolved ITP bugs and thus can be removed from the prospective package list in the tasks files to keep these clean from cruft. One more hint: in the same directory is the file debian-science.out which lists suspicious things. Many of them are listed because packages vanished or were renamed - others are mentioned because the tool is weak to detect alternatives properly. But having a look into this file from time to time helps to detect problematic dependencies in the tasks file. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#490247: cdd-dev: Data from official package should take precedence on manually filed data in task file
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008, Frederic Daniel Luc Lehobey wrote: Package: cdd-dev :-) The webtools stuff is not (yet) in cdd-dev - and perhaps it will never be packaged because in principle it needs only be installed on one host (alioth) and thus I have not seen a reason to package this stuff. (I have really thought about this, but found no good reason to do so ...) I think the information displayed for an official package when this package finally entered Debian should be the data of the package and not the data from the task file. Definitely! See for example the data for the Paraview package on this page http://cdd.alioth.debian.org/science/tasks/viewing.html that even displays the WNPP and older data obsoleted by the new package. Thanks for spotting this. I'll try to fix this and leave the bug open for the moment - but it just does not concern the cdd-dev package (for those who wonder whether there is something wrong with cdd-dev or not). Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#490247: cdd-dev: Data from official package should take precedence on manually filed data in task file
Hi, Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] (2008-07-11 09:03:09) : On Fri, 11 Jul 2008, Frederic Daniel Luc Lehobey wrote: Package: cdd-dev :-) The webtools stuff is not (yet) in cdd-dev - and perhaps it will never be packaged because in principle it needs only be installed on one host (alioth) and thus I have not seen a reason to package this stuff. Yes, you're right. What would be the best way to report bugs on the webtools stuff? With a new pseudo-package (http://www.debian.org/Bugs/pseudo-packages)? directly on debian-custom (but we'll lack the features of the BTS)? Thanks for spotting this. I'll try to fix this and leave the bug open for the moment - but it just does not concern the cdd-dev package (for those who wonder whether there is something wrong with cdd-dev or not). Thanks. Sorry for introducing a possible confusion. Best regards, Frédéric Lehobey -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#490247: cdd-dev: Data from official package should take precedence on manually filed data in task file
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008, Frederic Lehobey wrote: Yes, you're right. What would be the best way to report bugs on the webtools stuff? With a new pseudo-package (http://www.debian.org/Bugs/pseudo-packages)? directly on debian-custom (but we'll lack the features of the BTS)? Hmmm, I do not have a good idea. I do not really think that this rather minor tool should be regarded as pseudo package. Perhaps this might be a reason for packaging it? Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#490247: cdd-dev: Data from official package should take precedence on manually filed data in task file
Package: cdd-dev Version: 0.5.4 Severity: normal Hi, I think the information displayed for an official package when this package finally entered Debian should be the data of the package and not the data from the task file. See for example the data for the Paraview package on this page http://cdd.alioth.debian.org/science/tasks/viewing.html that even displays the WNPP and older data obsoleted by the new package. Best regards, Frédéric Lehobey -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-6-k7 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages cdd-dev depends on: ii apt 0.7.14 Advanced front-end for dpkg ii build-essential 11.3 informational list of build-essent ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.22 Debian configuration management sy ii debhelper 7.0.10 helper programs for debian/rules ii make 3.81-5 The GNU version of the make util cdd-dev recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
