Bug#494445: oops when loading nf_conntrack_ipv6
Vitaliy, hi, On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 02:55:56PM +0400, Vitaliy Gusev wrote: On 11 August 2008 19:39:35 maximilian attems wrote: hello, could you please take a look at: * oops on load of nf_conntrack_ipv6 http://bugs.debian.org/494445 IPv6 conntrack doesn't work yet. It will be finished in this week. I'm experiencing the oops on our latest kernel (2.6.26-7, seems to include openvz stuff up to 24cebf40). Do you have a fix for this? I'm only asking because you said you were fixing this back then. Thanks, Faidon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#494445: oops when loading nf_conntrack_ipv6
On 7 October 2008 09:59:29 Faidon Liambotis wrote: Vitaliy, hi, On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 02:55:56PM +0400, Vitaliy Gusev wrote: On 11 August 2008 19:39:35 maximilian attems wrote: hello, could you please take a look at: * oops on load of nf_conntrack_ipv6 http://bugs.debian.org/494445 IPv6 conntrack doesn't work yet. It will be finished in this week. I'm experiencing the oops on our latest kernel (2.6.26-7, seems to include openvz stuff up to 24cebf40). Do you have a fix for this? I'm only asking because you said you were fixing this back then. The linux-image-2.6.26-1-openvz doesn't have this fix. Latest 2.6.26-ovz has fix. For 2.6.27-ovz fix patches was sent To Pavel for review. Thanks, Faidon -- Thank, Vitaliy Gusev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#494445: oops when loading nf_conntrack_ipv6
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 12:01:13PM +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote: Vitaliy Gusev wrote: The linux-image-2.6.26-1-openvz doesn't have this fix. Latest 2.6.26-ovz has fix. For 2.6.27-ovz fix patches was sent To Pavel for review. Could you pinpoint the patch for 2.6.26 exactly, e.g. by a commit or by attaching it? If it's simple enough, perhaps the Debian kernel maintainers could add it to Debian's tree. no our diff versus openvz is getting huge: ~/src/linux-2.6.26-openvz$ git diff --shortstat 24cebf40278cb071ff8b.. 39 files changed, 589 insertions(+), 112 deletions(-) and yes there are 2 abi breaker there inside, so this will be considered for the next stable update after release that pumps abi. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#494445: oops when loading nf_conntrack_ipv6
On 7 October 2008 13:01:13 Faidon Liambotis wrote: Vitaliy Gusev wrote: The linux-image-2.6.26-1-openvz doesn't have this fix. Latest 2.6.26-ovz has fix. For 2.6.27-ovz fix patches was sent To Pavel for review. Could you pinpoint the patch for 2.6.26 exactly, e.g. by a commit or by attaching it? Commits: 490910232ebe61f65e5e5c03b7286f11291b6092 (netfilter: call nf_register_hooks from VE0 context only) 3cb8bc3781889ade74c02840b2eb8ddafb6d39c5 (netfilter: NAT: assign nf_nat_seq_adjust_hook from VE0 context only) 5fff3eb60f78acaadcae8562de5d3e6504f4d4f9 (conntrack: adjust context during freeing) 43553442d9467e2cdca7be044ff0cd497abe987f (conntrack: fix oops in nf_ct_frag6_gather) e29a555d7d8f88dbfcaed541e340a4e3977c76aa (ct: Move _nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv6 to net namespace) 2c1b2f728e1ae136ec1713bfec9892cf7cd656b6 (conntrack: Allocate/free ve_nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv6) 482dd20be37f61b2f94e6b3f3de1c1b9b4f9e6f1 (conntrack: prevent call nf_register_hooks() from VE context) 7d3f10fc5d8e268f7572cfdd2287c049bce3af7c (conntrack: prevent call register_pernet_subsys() from VE context) 17b09e1de42db77743ea9ae3dfd3a910ac57ee71 (conntrack: prevent double allocate/free of protos) If it's simple enough, perhaps the Debian kernel maintainers could add it to Debian's tree. Thanks, Faidon -- Thank, Vitaliy Gusev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#494445: oops when loading nf_conntrack_ipv6
Vitaliy Gusev wrote: The linux-image-2.6.26-1-openvz doesn't have this fix. Latest 2.6.26-ovz has fix. For 2.6.27-ovz fix patches was sent To Pavel for review. Could you pinpoint the patch for 2.6.26 exactly, e.g. by a commit or by attaching it? If it's simple enough, perhaps the Debian kernel maintainers could add it to Debian's tree. Thanks, Faidon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
