Bug#494473: severity of 494473 is serious
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 07:51:31PM -0700, Paul Hardy wrote: Robert: On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Paul Hardy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 09:04:34AM -0700, Paul Hardy wrote: I just saw from reading about Bug #494460 that it was unifont-bin that installed unifont.hex. With the package I put together last night for testing, /usr/share/unifont/unifont.hex is put in place by the unifont package, not the unifont-bin package... If it would be better, you could take the unifont source package the way I put it together and make these changes: 1) Delete the file debian/unifont.install (nothing else used it -- I just added it for this bug) 2) Add the directory usr/share/unifont to debian/unifont-bin.install I'll leave it up to your judgment. If it will be easier for GRUB to upload the above as a -3 version, please do so. When I wrote the above, I didn't have a preference one way or another. Now I do. After thinking about this, I believe the best long-term solution is to leave unifont.hex as part of the unifont package, the way it is in the -2 release, and not placing it in the unifont-bin package. This is because the nature of unifont.hex and of the unifont package in general are both Architecture: all and the nature of the unifont-bin package is definitely not Architecture: all. With unifont.hex out of the unifont-bin package, that will prevent redundant copies of a 4 Megabyte unifont.hex file (one for each architecture) from getting put in every single binary build. Ok. -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#494473: severity of 494473 is serious
Dear all, Thank you all for getting unifont 5.1.20080808-2 uploaded! Yes, just as Paul mentioned, I had been very busy with my work and personal life, and I would have missed the necessary Replaces: line too; thank you Robert for catching that. :-) Cheers, Anthony -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#494473: severity of 494473 is serious
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35 # introduces regressions in other packages severity 494473 serious -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#494473: severity of 494473 is serious
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 6:23 AM, Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35 # introduces regressions in other packages severity 494473 serious Robert, If you'd like to perform an NMU of the unifont-5.1.20080808-2 package that I told you about for testing, go ahead and upload it. I realize this is urgent. Please let me and Anthony Fok know. Paul Hardy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#494473: severity of 494473 is serious
I just saw from reading about Bug #494460 that it was unifont-bin that installed unifont.hex. With the package I put together last night for testing, /usr/share/unifont/unifont.hex is put in place by the unifont package, not the unifont-bin package. Will that still be okay for GRUB? Paul Hardy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#494473: severity of 494473 is serious
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 08:56:07AM -0700, Paul Hardy wrote: On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 6:23 AM, Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35 # introduces regressions in other packages severity 494473 serious Robert, If you'd like to perform an NMU of the unifont-5.1.20080808-2 package that I told you about for testing, go ahead and upload it. I realize this is urgent. Please let me and Anthony Fok know. Sure, I'll sponsor it right away. -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#494473: severity of 494473 is serious
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 09:04:34AM -0700, Paul Hardy wrote: I just saw from reading about Bug #494460 that it was unifont-bin that installed unifont.hex. With the package I put together last night for testing, /usr/share/unifont/unifont.hex is put in place by the unifont package, not the unifont-bin package. Will that still be okay for GRUB? I'd just have to adjust the Build-Depends. Assuming the release team is okay with me doing that, it's no problem for GRUB ;-) -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#494473: severity of 494473 is serious
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 07:05:46PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 08:56:07AM -0700, Paul Hardy wrote: On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 6:23 AM, Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35 # introduces regressions in other packages severity 494473 serious Robert, If you'd like to perform an NMU of the unifont-5.1.20080808-2 package that I told you about for testing, go ahead and upload it. I realize this is urgent. Please let me and Anthony Fok know. Sure, I'll sponsor it right away. Done. I noticed a Replaces is missing on the unifont-bin versions that used to include unifont.hex (this is always needed when moving files between packages). Since we're on a hurry, I added that for you: Replaces: unifont-bin ( 1:5.1.20080706-1) -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#494473: severity of 494473 is serious
Robert: On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sure, I'll sponsor it right away. Done. I noticed a Replaces is missing on the unifont-bin versions that used to include unifont.hex (this is always needed when moving files between packages). Since we're on a hurry, I added that for you: Replaces: unifont-bin ( 1:5.1.20080706-1) Thank you. I'll update my final -2 copy from what appears on debian.org. Paul Hardy GPG Key ID: E6E6E390 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#494473: severity of 494473 is serious
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 09:04:34AM -0700, Paul Hardy wrote: I just saw from reading about Bug #494460 that it was unifont-bin that installed unifont.hex. With the package I put together last night for testing, /usr/share/unifont/unifont.hex is put in place by the unifont package, not the unifont-bin package. Will that still be okay for GRUB? I'd just have to adjust the Build-Depends. Assuming the release team is okay with me doing that, it's no problem for GRUB ;-) If it would be better, you could take the unifont source package the way I put it together and make these changes: 1) Delete the file debian/unifont.install (nothing else used it -- I just added it for this bug) 2) Add the directory usr/share/unifont to debian/unifont-bin.install I'll leave it up to your judgment. If it will be easier for GRUB to upload the above as a -3 version, please do so. Paul Hardy GPG Key ID: E6E6E390 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#494473: severity of 494473 is serious
Robert: On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Paul Hardy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 09:04:34AM -0700, Paul Hardy wrote: I just saw from reading about Bug #494460 that it was unifont-bin that installed unifont.hex. With the package I put together last night for testing, /usr/share/unifont/unifont.hex is put in place by the unifont package, not the unifont-bin package... If it would be better, you could take the unifont source package the way I put it together and make these changes: 1) Delete the file debian/unifont.install (nothing else used it -- I just added it for this bug) 2) Add the directory usr/share/unifont to debian/unifont-bin.install I'll leave it up to your judgment. If it will be easier for GRUB to upload the above as a -3 version, please do so. When I wrote the above, I didn't have a preference one way or another. Now I do. After thinking about this, I believe the best long-term solution is to leave unifont.hex as part of the unifont package, the way it is in the -2 release, and not placing it in the unifont-bin package. This is because the nature of unifont.hex and of the unifont package in general are both Architecture: all and the nature of the unifont-bin package is definitely not Architecture: all. With unifont.hex out of the unifont-bin package, that will prevent redundant copies of a 4 Megabyte unifont.hex file (one for each architecture) from getting put in every single binary build. Paul Hardy GPG Key ID: E6E6E390 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
