Bug#495000: please consider making libatlas-base-dev optional
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009, Riku Voipio wrote: On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 09:45:02PM -0500, Tim Abbott wrote: Any news on this? It is blocking arrival of sagemath on several architectures (alpha, arm*) I hope you'll understand that I prioritized getting sagemath into Debian over getting its dependencies working on all architectures. Ok, I just wanted to know if there were any issues that were blocking solving this bug. Just a quick update on this; I've confirmed with upstream that they'd be happy to take a patch that modified iml to just require any blas implementation. Unfortunately, I've been quite busy and so I've not had time to rewrite their m4 yet. -Tim Abbott -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#495000: please consider making libatlas-base-dev optional
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 09:45:02PM -0500, Tim Abbott wrote: Any news on this? It is blocking arrival of sagemath on several architectures (alpha, arm*) I hope you'll understand that I prioritized getting sagemath into Debian over getting its dependencies working on all architectures. Ok, I just wanted to know if there were any issues that were blocking solving this bug. Now that Sage is in Debian, I will try to get this (and the analogous bug on linbox) fixed relatively soon. Thanks! -- rm -rf only sounds scary if you don't have backups -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#495000: please consider making libatlas-base-dev optional
user debian-...@lists.debian.org usertag 495000 eabi thanks Any news on this? It is blocking arrival of sagemath on several architectures (alpha, arm*) -- rm -rf only sounds scary if you don't have backups -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#495000: please consider making libatlas-base-dev optional
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009, Riku Voipio wrote: user debian-...@lists.debian.org usertag 495000 eabi thanks Any news on this? It is blocking arrival of sagemath on several architectures (alpha, arm*) I hope you'll understand that I prioritized getting sagemath into Debian over getting its dependencies working on all architectures. Now that Sage is in Debian, I will try to get this (and the analogous bug on linbox) fixed relatively soon. Thanks, -Tim Abbott -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#495000: please consider making libatlas-base-dev optional
Package: iml Version: 1.0.3-1 Severity: wishlist Some platforms[1] are missing atlas, and thus can't compile ilm. However, it looks like iml is not including any atlas_* headers, only cblas.h, which is provided by libblas-dev. Please allow building agains libbblas-dev on platforms where atlas isn't available. [1] http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?suite=unstablep=atlas -- rm -rf only sounds scary if you don't have backups -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
