Bug#496383: xastir - broken temp file patch (#496383)
Op zondag 31-08-2008 om 18:06 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Gerfried Fuchs: * Joop Stakenborg [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-28 16:53:41 CEST]: Op donderdag 28-08-2008 om 16:06 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Tomas Hoger: You probably wanted to use: TMPFILE=`mktemp -t` instead of TMPFILE = 'mktemp -t' in your patch for #496383, right? Ouch, will fix ASAP, thanks! You didn't, the required fix required to use backticks instead of quotes ... I am sorry, I am not a very good shell script writer. I'm currently building an NMU to fix this problem (find attached the interdiff for it). Furthermore, the TMPFILE never gets removed, is there a particular reason to not do so? No reason. I will contact upstream so the next version will fix this. So long, Rhonda Thanks, Joop signature.asc Description: Dit berichtdeel is digitaal ondertekend
Bug#496383: xastir - broken temp file patch (#496383)
* Joop Stakenborg [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-28 16:53:41 CEST]: Op donderdag 28-08-2008 om 16:06 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Tomas Hoger: You probably wanted to use: TMPFILE=`mktemp -t` instead of TMPFILE = 'mktemp -t' in your patch for #496383, right? Ouch, will fix ASAP, thanks! You didn't, the required fix required to use backticks instead of quotes ... I'm currently building an NMU to fix this problem (find attached the interdiff for it). Furthermore, the TMPFILE never gets removed, is there a particular reason to not do so? So long, Rhonda xastir_1.9.2-2_1.9.2-2.1.interdiff.gz Description: Binary data
Bug#496383: xastir - broken temp file patch (#496383)
* Gerfried Fuchs [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-31 18:06:54 CEST]: I'm currently building an NMU to fix this problem (find attached the interdiff for it). Furthermore, the TMPFILE never gets removed, is there a particular reason to not do so? Uploaded, one further question, did you actually at any point take a look at the lintian output of the package? It's a fair bit, even including an Error and not only Warnings, and some of the Warnings do indeed look a bit fishy, especially the debian-rules-calls-debhelper-in-odd-order one. So long, Rhonda -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#496383: xastir - broken temp file patch (#496383)
Hi Joop! You probably wanted to use: TMPFILE=`mktemp -t` instead of TMPFILE = 'mktemp -t' in your patch for #496383, right? HTH -- Tomas Hoger -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#496383: xastir - broken temp file patch (#496383)
Op donderdag 28-08-2008 om 16:06 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Tomas Hoger: Hi Joop! You probably wanted to use: TMPFILE=`mktemp -t` instead of TMPFILE = 'mktemp -t' in your patch for #496383, right? Ouch, will fix ASAP, thanks! HTH -- Tomas Hoger Joop signature.asc Description: Dit berichtdeel is digitaal ondertekend
