Bug#501960: Bug#500171: apertium: FTBFS in ia64
On Sunday 12 October 2008 11:36:26 Chris Lamb wrote: While building in ia64, fails to build [..] The cause of this appears to be flex generating invalid output in some situations, which I've filed as #501960. Chris, Francis, Your RC bug (#500171) appears to be solvable now with the upload of flex (2.5.35-3) (#501960 was blocking), I recommend an upload of a new package with a Build Depend against flex (= 2.5.35-3) should be able to close this bug. Mark -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#501960: Bug#500171: apertium: FTBFS in ia64
Mark Purcell wrote: I recommend an upload of a new package with a Build Depend against flex (= 2.5.35-3) should be able to close this bug. Yip. Francis, please let me know if you would like an NMU for this. Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` [EMAIL PROTECTED] `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#500171: Bug#501960: Bug#500171: apertium: FTBFS in ia64
* Chris Lamb [Wed, 29 Oct 2008 20:38:00 +]: Mark Purcell wrote: I recommend an upload of a new package with a Build Depend against flex (= 2.5.35-3) should be able to close this bug. Yip. Francis, please let me know if you would like an NMU for this. No, please don't upload just for that. This is a transient condition, and we don't normally bump versions in build-dependencies to work against buggy versions. I'll give back apertium on ia64 now. (Though then it'll get caught on the pcre3 shlibs bump; I'll take care of that as well.) Thanks, -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org Listening to: Dar Williams - February -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#501960: Bug#500171: apertium: FTBFS in ia64
notfound 500171 3.0.7+1-2 close 500171 thanks * Adeodato Simó [Wed, 29 Oct 2008 22:09:04 +0100]: * Chris Lamb [Wed, 29 Oct 2008 20:38:00 +]: Mark Purcell wrote: I recommend an upload of a new package with a Build Depend against flex (= 2.5.35-3) should be able to close this bug. Yip. Francis, please let me know if you would like an NMU for this. No, please don't upload just for that. This is a transient condition, and we don't normally bump versions in build-dependencies to work against buggy versions. I'll give back apertium on ia64 now. (Though then it'll get caught on the pcre3 shlibs bump; I'll take care of that as well.) Ah, somebody did that already, but it failed with a different error: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=apertiumver=3.0.7%2B1-2arch=ia64stamp=1225290285file=log Let's close this bug, and open a new one. -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org Listening to: Dar Williams - Iowa (Traveling III) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
