Bug#503395: RFS: mod-spamhaus

2008-11-03 Thread Giuseppe Iuculano
Paul Wise ha scritto:
 On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 2:15 AM, Giuseppe Iuculano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mod-spamhaus/mod-spamhaus_0.7-1.dsc
 
 Some more things:
 
 Your package description needs some grammar fixes, please ask for a
 review on debian-l10n-english.

Done [0]

 
 You don't specify any specific version the GPL for your packaging, was
 that intentional?

Ok, now it is licensed under the same license as the software itself.

 
 Upstream's license grant is unclear about the GPL version; either
 version 3 of the License. doesn't make sense.
 
 The ReadMe.txt file only contains information present elsewhere in the
 package (debian/copyright, debian/control, debian/rules,
 debian/postinst, debian/conf), I don't think you need to ship it in
 the .deb.
 
 Other than that (and without having tested it) the package looks good.
 


Fixed and uploaded again on mentors.

[0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-l10n-english/2008/11/msg3.html

Giuseppe.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#503395: RFS: mod-spamhaus

2008-11-03 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 10:43 PM, Giuseppe Iuculano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Fixed and uploaded again on mentors.

Sorry about this, but I just noticed that there is already a DNSBL
module for apache2 in Debian (libapache2-mod-defensible). Please
investigate if mod-spamhaus is useful to add despite that.

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#503395: RFS: mod-spamhaus

2008-11-03 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 11:29 PM, Giuseppe Iuculano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Yes, I know, but I prefer (and I'm using) mod-spamhaus because:

Fair enough, I've uploaded the package.

Thanks for your work, please mail debian-mentors for future uploads
and I'll upload if I am able.

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#503395: RFS: mod-spamhaus

2008-11-03 Thread Giuseppe Iuculano
Paul Wise ha scritto:
 Sorry about this, but I just noticed that there is already a DNSBL
 module for apache2 in Debian (libapache2-mod-defensible). Please
 investigate if mod-spamhaus is useful to add despite that.
 

Yes, I know, but I prefer (and I'm using) mod-spamhaus because:

1) I can choose HTTP methods (POST,PUT,...) to block
2) I can have a whitelist
3) I can have a custom error (Access Denied, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for more
information)


Giuseppe.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#503395: RFS: mod-spamhaus

2008-11-02 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Giuseppe Iuculano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 There is a LICENSE file, isn't it enough?

License and copyright holder are two different things. Licenses
specify what you are allowed to do with the work, the copyright holder
information tells you who is giving you a license.

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#503395: RFS: mod-spamhaus

2008-11-02 Thread Giuseppe Iuculano
Paul Wise ha scritto:
 
 The upstream source does not contain any copyright information, you
 might want to ask them to fix that.

There is a LICENSE file, isn't it enough?



Giuseppe.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#503395: RFS: mod-spamhaus

2008-11-02 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 5:54 AM, Giuseppe Iuculano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mod-spamhaus/mod-spamhaus_0.6-1.dsc

A review of your source package:

debian/watch should use the standard sf qa redirector, please read the
uscan manual page.

The upstream source does not contain any copyright information, you
might want to ask them to fix that.

There is a new upstream version available (0.7).

Please ask upstream to fix the compiler warnings:

src/mod_spamhaus.c: In function 'core':
src/mod_spamhaus.c:256: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer
without a cast
src/mod_spamhaus.c: In function 'num_cached_ip':
src/mod_spamhaus.c:358: warning: passing argument 1 of 'atoi' makes
pointer from integer without a cast
src/mod_spamhaus.c: At top level:
src/mod_spamhaus.c:367: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
src/mod_spamhaus.c:368: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
src/mod_spamhaus.c:369: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
src/mod_spamhaus.c:370: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#503395: RFS: mod-spamhaus

2008-11-02 Thread Giuseppe Iuculano
Paul Wise ha scritto:
 A review of your source package:
 
 debian/watch should use the standard sf qa redirector, please read the
 uscan manual page.
 
 The upstream source does not contain any copyright information, you
 might want to ask them to fix that.
 
 There is a new upstream version available (0.7).
 
 Please ask upstream to fix the compiler warnings:
 
 src/mod_spamhaus.c: In function 'core':
 src/mod_spamhaus.c:256: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer
 without a cast
 src/mod_spamhaus.c: In function 'num_cached_ip':
 src/mod_spamhaus.c:358: warning: passing argument 1 of 'atoi' makes
 pointer from integer without a cast
 src/mod_spamhaus.c: At top level:
 src/mod_spamhaus.c:367: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
 src/mod_spamhaus.c:368: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
 src/mod_spamhaus.c:369: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
 src/mod_spamhaus.c:370: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
 


Upstream uploaded a new tarball with copyright and compiler warnings fixes. I
uploaded the new revision on mentors:

- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mod-spamhaus
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main
contrib non-free
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mod-spamhaus/mod-spamhaus_0.7-1.dsc


Thanks for your review.


Giuseppe.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#503395: RFS: mod-spamhaus

2008-11-02 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 2:15 AM, Giuseppe Iuculano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mod-spamhaus/mod-spamhaus_0.7-1.dsc

Some more things:

Your package description needs some grammar fixes, please ask for a
review on debian-l10n-english.

You don't specify any specific version the GPL for your packaging, was
that intentional?

Upstream's license grant is unclear about the GPL version; either
version 3 of the License. doesn't make sense.

The ReadMe.txt file only contains information present elsewhere in the
package (debian/copyright, debian/control, debian/rules,
debian/postinst, debian/conf), I don't think you need to ship it in
the .deb.

Other than that (and without having tested it) the package looks good.

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#503395: RFS: mod-spamhaus

2008-11-02 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Upstream's license grant is unclear about the GPL version; either
 version 3 of the License. doesn't make sense.

In addition, the Makefile and the source code say it is GPL v2 or
later. I think upstream should make up their mind about which version
of the GPL to use.

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#503395: RFS: mod-spamhaus

2008-10-25 Thread Giuseppe Iuculano
Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package mod-spamhaus.

* Package name: mod-spamhaus
  Version : 0.5-1
  Upstream Author : Luca Ercoli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/mod-spamhaus/
* License : GPL
  Section : web

It builds these binary packages:
libapache2-mod-spamhaus - Apache DNSBL module that deny access to a known bad IP
address

The package appears to be lintian clean.

The upload would fix these bugs: 503395


What's mod_spamhaus
===

mod_spamhaus is an Apache module that use DNSBL in order to block spam relay via
web forms, preventing URL injection, block http DDoS attacks from bots and
generally protecting your web service denying access to a known bad IP address.
It take advantage of the Spamhaus Block List (SBL) and the Exploits Block List
(XBL) querying sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org Spamhaus's DNSBLs are offered as a free
public service for low-volume non-commercial use.


The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mod-spamhaus
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main
contrib non-free
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mod-spamhaus/mod-spamhaus_0.5-1.dsc

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Kind regards
 Giuseppe Iuculano



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature