Bug#503921: gnupg2 to provide gnupg?
* Harald Dunkel (harald.dun...@aixigo.de) wrote: Now that Wheezy is out, wouldn't it be nice to get this off the table? This bug report is almost 5 years old. Are there any concerns? I'd still like to do it. I've just uploaded a new version that splits out gpgv2 into its own package so this should be pretty straightforward to do for gnupg/gnupg2 and gpgv/gpgv2. -- Eric Dorland e...@kuroneko.ca ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#503921: gnupg2 to provide gnupg?
Now that Wheezy is out, wouldn't it be nice to get this off the table? This bug report is almost 5 years old. Are there any concerns? Regards Harri -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#503921: gnupg2 to provide gnupg?
Hi. Yes I know that I'm impatient,... ;) .. but anything new here? :-) Cheers, Chris. This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#503921: gnupg2 to provide gnupg?
Hi Eric. Sorry for that ultra long delay. On Sun, 2008-12-28 at 17:35 -0500, Eric Dorland wrote: I want to see it get done, and I'd definitely want to get it in for squeeze, but I've had a harder time finding time for my Debian work lately due to real work so I don't want to make promises I can't keep :) But it's definitely high on my personal Debian todo list. Great great great :-) And would it be possible for you, to arrange with the gnupg maintainer which name will be chosen for the gnupg1 binary? e.g. gpg1 for gnupg and gpg2 for gnupg2 and gpg for the alternatives symlink? This would almost certainly be the case. Wonderful. Looking forward to see this happen :-) Best wishes, Chris. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Bug#503921: gnupg2 to provide gnupg?
* calestyo-webm...@scientia.net (calestyo-webm...@scientia.net) wrote: Hi Eric. Would it be possible to do this now, and not wait for lenny to release? Or perhaps making the necessary modifications just for experimental? Unfortunately we're in a deep freeze right now, and it's a fairly non-trivial thing to do even to get it put into experimental. Patches are certainly welcome though :) The reason is that I'm about to write some OpenPGP decryption scripts for cryptsetup where I'd like to use the gnupg or gnupg2 and it would make things easier for me if alternatives would already be implemented ;) -- Eric Dorland e...@kuroneko.ca ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#503921: gnupg2 to provide gnupg?
Hi Eric. On Sun, 2008-12-28 at 16:54 -0500, Eric Dorland wrote: Unfortunately we're in a deep freeze right now, and it's a fairly non-trivial thing to do even to get it put into experimental. Patches are certainly welcome though :) Ok I see,... I'd really like to help you but I'm stuck with work too :-/ But is this going to be implemented? I mean at some point? And would it be possible for you, to arrange with the gnupg maintainer which name will be chosen for the gnupg1 binary? e.g. gpg1 for gnupg and gpg2 for gnupg2 and gpg for the alternatives symlink? Best wishes, Chris. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Bug#503921: gnupg2 to provide gnupg?
* Christoph Anton Mitterer (cales...@scientia.net) wrote: Hi Eric. On Sun, 2008-12-28 at 16:54 -0500, Eric Dorland wrote: Unfortunately we're in a deep freeze right now, and it's a fairly non-trivial thing to do even to get it put into experimental. Patches are certainly welcome though :) Ok I see,... I'd really like to help you but I'm stuck with work too :-/ But is this going to be implemented? I mean at some point? I want to see it get done, and I'd definitely want to get it in for squeeze, but I've had a harder time finding time for my Debian work lately due to real work so I don't want to make promises I can't keep :) But it's definitely high on my personal Debian todo list. And would it be possible for you, to arrange with the gnupg maintainer which name will be chosen for the gnupg1 binary? e.g. gpg1 for gnupg and gpg2 for gnupg2 and gpg for the alternatives symlink? This would almost certainly be the case. -- Eric Dorland e...@kuroneko.ca ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#503921: gnupg2 to provide gnupg?
Hi Eric. Would it be possible to do this now, and not wait for lenny to release? Or perhaps making the necessary modifications just for experimental? The reason is that I'm about to write some OpenPGP decryption scripts for cryptsetup where I'd like to use the gnupg or gnupg2 and it would make things easier for me if alternatives would already be implemented ;) Best wishes, Chris. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#503921: gnupg2 to provide gnupg?
forcemerge 483724 503921 thanks * Harald Dunkel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Package: gnupg2 Version: 2.0.9-3.1 Severity: wishlist Do you think it would be possible for gnupg2 to provide gnupg? AFAICS gnupg2 provides more configuration options and is backward compatible to gnupg. That should be sufficient to resolve the dependencies of other packages, e.g. dpkg-dev and debian keyring. Why install both? Esp. I like gnupg2's new log-file option. Very nice to document who logs in onto the server. BTW, gnupg2's description still describes gnupg, and its restriction over PGP2. I have plans to make it an alternative post-lenny, assuming the gnupg maintainer is amenable. -- Eric Dorland [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#503921: gnupg2 to provide gnupg?
Package: gnupg2 Version: 2.0.9-3.1 Severity: wishlist Do you think it would be possible for gnupg2 to provide gnupg? AFAICS gnupg2 provides more configuration options and is backward compatible to gnupg. That should be sufficient to resolve the dependencies of other packages, e.g. dpkg-dev and debian keyring. Why install both? Esp. I like gnupg2's new log-file option. Very nice to document who logs in onto the server. BTW, gnupg2's description still describes gnupg, and its restriction over PGP2. Many thanx Harri -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
