Bug#516131: aptitude: unmarkauto not working?

2015-12-03 Thread Francesco Potortì
>2009-02-19 13:01 Francesco Potort�:
>>
>>
>>[...]
>>
>> tucano:/tmp# aptitude unmarkauto glpk-doc glpk-utils
>> Reading package lists... Done
>> Building dependency tree
>> Reading state information... Done
>> Reading extended state information
>> Initializing package states... Done
>> Reading task descriptions... Done
>> The following packages will be REMOVED:
>>   glpk-doc{u} glpk-utils{u}
>> 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 2 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
>> Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 1892kB will be freed.
>> Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?]   n
>> Abort.
>>
>>Something is going wrong.  I cannot seem to be able to tell aptitude
>>that I really want those packages.
>
>Unfortunately this package does not exist and the new octave-info
>doesn't have the same dependencies.
>
>But in general, I have not observed this kind of behaviour nor have seen
>bugs reported related to this in the recent years/versions.  Some parts
>of the resolver were changed a lot in those years, esp. in the run up to
>0.6.
>
>Have you experienced the same behaviour since, or did it only happen
>during that time?

Maybe I have had the same behaviour other times, but I do not remember.
The only thing that I know is that I still remember that every time I
tried using nomarkauto it did not work, but it is not something that I
do often.

Also, I suspect that nomarkauto is a rarely used command, so I would not
rely on lack of feedback to assume that it works.  And osrry, I have not
ime now to devise a different test to check the functionality of
unmarkauto. 

-- 
Francesco Potortì (ricercatore)Voice:  +39.050.621.3058
ISTI - Area della ricerca CNR  Mobile: +39.348.8283.107
via G. Moruzzi 1, I-56124 Pisa Skype:  wnlabisti
(entrance 20, 1st floor, room C71) Web:http://fly.isti.cnr.it



Bug#516131: aptitude: unmarkauto not working?

2015-12-02 Thread Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo


Hi Francesco,

2009-02-19 13:01 Francesco Potort�:



[...]

tucano:/tmp# aptitude unmarkauto glpk-doc glpk-utils
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Reading extended state information
Initializing package states... Done
Reading task descriptions... Done
The following packages will be REMOVED:
  glpk-doc{u} glpk-utils{u}
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 2 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 1892kB will be freed.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?]   n
Abort.

Something is going wrong.  I cannot seem to be able to tell aptitude
that I really want those packages.


Unfortunately this package does not exist and the new octave-info
doesn't have the same dependencies.

But in general, I have not observed this kind of behaviour nor have seen
bugs reported related to this in the recent years/versions.  Some parts
of the resolver were changed a lot in those years, esp. in the run up to
0.6.

Have you experienced the same behaviour since, or did it only happen
during that time?


Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo 



Bug#516131: aptitude: unmarkauto not working?

2009-02-20 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 02:01:52PM +0100, Francesco Potort� 
poto...@isti.cnr.it was heard to say:
  tucano:/tmp# aptitude unmarkauto glpk-doc glpk-utils
  Reading package lists... Done
  Building dependency tree
  Reading state information... Done
  Reading extended state information
  Initializing package states... Done
  Reading task descriptions... Done
  The following packages will be REMOVED:
glpk-doc{u} glpk-utils{u}
  0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 2 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
  Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 1892kB will be freed.
  Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?]   n
  Abort.
 
 Something is going wrong.  I cannot seem to be able to tell aptitude
 that I really want those packages.

  If you show those packages (e.g., with aptitude show, do they show
as being automatically installed?

  Daniel



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#516131: aptitude: unmarkauto not working?

2009-02-20 Thread Francesco Potorti`
  If you show those packages (e.g., with aptitude show, do they show
as being automatically installed?

Yes:

tucano:/tmp# dpkg --purge glpk
(Reading database ... 342694 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing glpk ...

tucano:/tmp# dpkg --purge libglpk-dev
(Reading database ... 342685 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing libglpk-dev ...

tucano:/tmp# aptitude install bash
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree   
Reading state information... Done
Reading extended state information  
Initializing package states... Done
Writing extended state information... Done
Reading task descriptions... Done
The following packages will be REMOVED:
  glpk-doc{u} glpk-utils{u} 
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 2 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 1892kB will be freed.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?] n
Abort.

tucano:/tmp# aptitude unmarkauto glpk-doc glpk-utils
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree   
Reading state information... Done
Reading extended state information  
Initializing package states... Done
Reading task descriptions... Done
The following packages will be REMOVED:
  glpk-doc{u} glpk-utils{u} 
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 2 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 1892kB will be freed.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?] n
Abort.

tucano:/tmp# aptitude show glpk-doc glpk-utils
Package: glpk-doc
New: yes
State: not installed
Automatically installed: yes
Version: 4.29-2
Priority: optional
Section: doc
Maintainer: Debian Scientific Computation Team 
pkg-scicomp-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Uncompressed Size: 508k
Conflicts: glpk ( 4.15)
Description: linear programming kit - documentation files
 GLPK (GNU Linear Programming Kit) is intended for solving large-scale linear
 programming (LP), mixed integer programming (MIP), and other related problems.
 It is a set of routines written in ANSI C and organized in the form of a
 callable library. 
 
 This package contains the C API reference manual and the GNU MathProg modeling
 language manual.
Homepage: http://www.gnu.org/software/glpk/glpk.html

Package: glpk-utils
New: yes
State: not installed
Automatically installed: yes
Version: 4.29-2
Priority: optional
Section: math
Maintainer: Debian Scientific Computation Team 
pkg-scicomp-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Uncompressed Size: 360k
Depends: libglpk0 (= 4.29-2), libc6 (= 2.7-1), libgmp3c2, libltdl3 (=
 1.5.2-2), zlib1g (= 1:1.1.4)
Conflicts: glpk ( 4.15)
Description: linear programming kit - documentation files
 GLPK (GNU Linear Programming Kit) is intended for solving large-scale linear
 programming (LP), mixed integer programming (MIP), and other related problems.
 It is a set of routines written in ANSI C and organized in the form of a
 callable library. 
 
 This package contains the following stand-alone tools: 
 * glpsol: LP/MIP solver 
 * tspsol: TSP solver
Homepage: http://www.gnu.org/software/glpk/glpk.html

-- 
Francesco Potortì (ricercatore)Voice: +39 050 315 3058 (op.2111)
ISTI - Area della ricerca CNR  Fax:   +39 050 315 2040
via G. Moruzzi 1, I-56124 Pisa Email: poto...@isti.cnr.it
(entrance 20, 1st floor, room C71) Web:   http://fly.isti.cnr.it/




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#516131: aptitude: unmarkauto not working?

2009-02-19 Thread Francesco Potort�
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.4.11.11-1
Severity: normal

I try this:

 tucano:/tmp# aptitude install octave3.1-info
 Reading package lists... Done
 Building dependency tree
 Reading state information... Done
 Reading extended state information
 Initializing package states... Done
 Reading task descriptions... Done
 The following packages will be REMOVED:
   glpk-doc{u} glpk-utils{u}
 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 2 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
 Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 1892kB will be freed.
 Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?] n
Abort.

Okay, this is normal: i removed the old empty glpk package, so I have to
tell aptitude that I really want these.  So I do:

 tucano:/tmp# aptitude unmarkauto glpk-doc glpk-utils
 Reading package lists... Done
 Building dependency tree
 Reading state information... Done
 Reading extended state information
 Initializing package states... Done
 Reading task descriptions... Done
 The following packages will be REMOVED:
   glpk-doc{u} glpk-utils{u}
 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 2 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
 Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 1892kB will be freed.
 Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?]   n
 Abort.

Something is going wrong.  I cannot seem to be able to tell aptitude
that I really want those packages.

-- Package-specific info:
aptitude 0.4.11.11 compiled at Nov 20 2008 05:11:32
Compiler: g++ 4.3.2
Compiled against:
  apt version 4.6.0
  NCurses version 5.7
  libsigc++ version: 2.0.18
  Ept support enabled.

Current library versions:
  NCurses version: ncurses 5.7.20081213
  cwidget version: 0.5.12
  Apt version: 4.6.0
linux-vdso.so.1 =  (0x7fff6000)
libapt-pkg-libc6.7-6.so.4.6 = /usr/lib/libapt-pkg-libc6.7-6.so.4.6 
(0x7f1e67a36000)
libncursesw.so.5 = /lib/libncursesw.so.5 (0x7f1e677eb000)
libsigc-2.0.so.0 = /usr/lib/libsigc-2.0.so.0 (0x7f1e675e6000)
libcwidget.so.3 = /usr/lib/libcwidget.so.3 (0x7f1e67313000)
libept.so.0 = /usr/lib/libept.so.0 (0x7f1e6709a000)
libxapian.so.15 = /usr/lib/libxapian.so.15 (0x7f1e66d3)
libz.so.1 = /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0x7f1e66b19000)
libpthread.so.0 = /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x7f1e668fd000)
libstdc++.so.6 = /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0x7f1e665f1000)
libm.so.6 = /lib/libm.so.6 (0x7f1e6636e000)
libgcc_s.so.1 = /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x7f1e66157000)
libc.so.6 = /lib/libc.so.6 (0x7f1e65e04000)
libutil.so.1 = /lib/libutil.so.1 (0x7f1e65c01000)
libdl.so.2 = /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x7f1e659fd000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x7f1e67cf7000)
Terminal: screen.linux
$DISPLAY is set.
`which aptitude`: /usr/bin/aptitude
aptitude version information:

aptitude linkage:

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'testing-proposed-updates')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, lc_ctype=it...@euro (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to C)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages aptitude depends on:
ii  apt [libapt-pkg-libc6. 0.7.20.2  Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii  libc6  2.7-18GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libcwidget30.5.12-4  high-level terminal interface libr
ii  libept00.5.26High-level library for managing De
ii  libgcc11:4.3.3-3 GCC support library
ii  libncursesw5   5.7+20081213-1shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libsigc++-2.0-0c2a 2.0.18-2  type-safe Signal Framework for C++
ii  libstdc++6 4.3.3-3   The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libxapian151.0.7-4   Search engine library
ii  zlib1g 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-12 compression library - runtime

Versions of packages aptitude recommends:
ii  aptitude-doc-en [aptitude-do 0.4.11.11-1 English manual for aptitude, a ter
ii  libparse-debianchangelog-per 1.1.1-2 parse Debian changelogs and output

Versions of packages aptitude suggests:
pn  debtags   none (no description available)
ii  tasksel   2.78   Tool for selecting tasks for insta

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org