Bug#516222: RFS: libnet - orphaning libnet

2009-03-27 Thread David Paleino
retitle 516222 O: libnet -- library for the construction and handling of 
network packets
thanks

Hello,
libnet has been in RFA (Request for Adoption) for more than a month now, and
I'm hereby orphaning it.

Someone please pick it up, as it's an important piece of software in Debian.

Sam Roberts (CCed) is taking over upstream development, please contact him when
adopting libnet.

Also CCing one listed Uploader, even though he completely missed from
development, bugfixing, anything.

To mentors: would someone please upload the package? (sid-lintian clean)

http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libnet/libnet_1.1.2.1-5.dsc

Thank you.

Ciao,
David

-- 
 . ''`.  Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
 : :'  : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
 `. `'`  GPG: 1392B174 | http://snipr.com/qa_page
   `-   2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#516222: RFS: libnet - orphaning libnet

2009-03-27 Thread Stefanos Harhalakis
Hello,

On Friday 27 March 2009, David Paleino wrote:
 retitle 516222 O: libnet -- library for the construction and handling of
 network packets thanks

 Hello,
 libnet has been in RFA (Request for Adoption) for more than a month now,
 and I'm hereby orphaning it.

 Someone please pick it up, as it's an important piece of software in
 Debian.

 Sam Roberts (CCed) is taking over upstream development, please contact him
 when adopting libnet.

I'm willing to maintain it.

I'm not familiar with libnet source code but I'm with its subject and I can 
package it whenever a new version becomes available or when a new package is 
needed.

From what you say, I guess that the homepage[1] will change in the near 
future. Is there another one ? 

I see that you use git. Is it madantory to use git? (I'm not familiar with 
it).

Also, I'm somehow new in this maintaining thing, so if there is someone else 
interested, please do it...

... but if not, I'd appreciate any information I can have.

[1] http://www.packetfactory.net/libnet/



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#516222: RFS: libnet - orphaning libnet

2009-03-27 Thread David Paleino
F/up set, please respect it
(I forgot setting it in my first mail, sorry.)

On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:05:21 +0200, Stefanos Harhalakis wrote:

 Hello,

Hello Stefanos,

 On Friday 27 March 2009, David Paleino wrote:
  retitle 516222 O: libnet -- library for the construction and handling of
  network packets thanks
 
  Hello,
  libnet has been in RFA (Request for Adoption) for more than a month now,
  and I'm hereby orphaning it.
 
  Someone please pick it up, as it's an important piece of software in
  Debian.
 
  Sam Roberts (CCed) is taking over upstream development, please contact him
  when adopting libnet.
 
 I'm willing to maintain it.

Great!

 I'm not familiar with libnet source code but I'm with its subject and I can 
 package it whenever a new version becomes available or when a new package is 
 needed.
 
 From what you say, I guess that the homepage[1] will change in the near 
 future. Is there another one ? 
 
 [1] http://www.packetfactory.net/libnet/

Not yet, Sam Roberts is working on it in a github repository:

http://github.com/sam-github/libnet/tree/master

 I see that you use git. Is it madantory to use git? (I'm not familiar with 
 it).

No. You (or whoever is going to maintain it) may use whichever $VCS you want.
There's some old-ish SVN repository for libnet (I migrated it to git recently,
so the history there is not that old -- if you meant to use SVN, that is)

http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/collab-maint/deb-maint/libnet

But please note that the SVN repo is quite broken [0] -- you may want to
remove it and start it all over again (maybe re-importing it from git?)

[0] i.e. I wasn't very comfortable with SVN branches, so I just did all the
changes in trunk/, and there's a beta version packaged there, which I
completely dropped from the Git repo. Also, Sam Roberts seems to have merged
bits from there into 1.1.3 (which he's working on), so I'd warmly suggest not
to use the existing SVN repo at all.

Ciao,
David

-- 
 . ''`.  Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
 : :'  : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
 `. `'`  GPG: 1392B174 | http://snipr.com/qa_page
   `-   2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#516222: RFS: libnet - orphaning libnet

2009-03-27 Thread Jan Christoph Nordholz
Hi Stefanos,

if you need help, I could lend a hand now and then. I don't have the
time to maintain the package on my own, but I have a faible for old
and/or undocumented C code and some experience in delving through
networking code in particular, so I could e.g. help hunting bugs.


Regards,

Jan


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#516222: RFS: libnet - orphaning libnet

2009-03-27 Thread Stefanos Harhalakis
Hello,

On Friday 27 March 2009, Jan Christoph Nordholz wrote:
 Hi Stefanos,

 if you need help, I could lend a hand now and then. I don't have the
 time to maintain the package on my own, but I have a faible for old
 and/or undocumented C code and some experience in delving through
 networking code in particular, so I could e.g. help hunting bugs.

Thank you for your offer. I'm also quite familiar with C and networking code 
and I hope that there will be no problems. If there are any I'll annoy 
you :-)



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#516222: RFS: libnet - orphaning libnet

2009-03-27 Thread Stefanos Harhalakis
On Friday 27 March 2009, David Paleino wrote:
 F/up set, please respect it
 (I forgot setting it in my first mail, sorry.)

Being a user of kmail I don't really know if it is possible to easily handle 
it. Also, I'm not suer I completely understand what you mean. You want to 
only send replies to the debian-devel list? (If yes, excuse this reply :-)

  I see that you use git. Is it madantory to use git? (I'm not familiar
  with it).

 No. You (or whoever is going to maintain it) may use whichever $VCS you
 want. There's some old-ish SVN repository for libnet (I migrated it to git
 recently, so the history there is not that old -- if you meant to use SVN,
 that is)

 http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/collab-maint/deb-maint/libnet

 But please note that the SVN repo is quite broken [0] -- you may want to
 remove it and start it all over again (maybe re-importing it from git?)

I have to have this stored in an VCS? For some other packages i packaged (only 
1 in debian), i used a local copy (at least to begin with).

If yes: Do I have to have the whole package in the VCS or just the debian/ 
directory? From what I've read I assumed that I only need to have local 
copies (or a versioning system) of debian/.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.