Bug#519006: breaks dump builds, too
On 10.06.2010 21:05, Arnaud Patard (Rtp) wrote: Matthias Klosed...@debian.org writes: so what do you propose? - drop mips as a release architecture? - do you volunteer to make gcc-4.5 ready for inclusion in mips and fix any resulting RC-critical issue? I'm no gcc or binutils hacker. I've reported what I understood on the issue in order to help seeing it fixed. My mail was not intended to offense you at all. Unfortunately, it looks like it was not well perceived so I will stop replying to this bug. I'm not using Debian on my mips boxes after all... no, I'm not offended, just stating that I don't work on this issue and asking if somebody else is working on this. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#519006: breaks dump builds, too
Matthias Klose d...@debian.org writes: On 09.06.2010 12:02, Arnaud Patard (Rtp) wrote: Matthias Klosed...@debian.org writes: Hi, On 08.06.2010 20:02, Bdale Garbee wrote: This prevents dump from building on mips/mipsel, which means the version of dump in testing is now months out of date. Is there an estimate for when this bug will be fixed? this is up to the debian-mips maintainers to answer. is there different behaviour when all objects involved in the link are rebuilt with binutils from experimental? hmm... Why are you talking about binutils ? From what I remember, the patch fixing the issue is in gcc 4.5 reference? http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10144#c6 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=519006#97 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=519006#111 and someone said it won't be easy to backport it. so what do you propose? - drop mips as a release architecture? - do you volunteer to make gcc-4.5 ready for inclusion in mips and fix any resulting RC-critical issue? I'm no gcc or binutils hacker. I've reported what I understood on the issue in order to help seeing it fixed. My mail was not intended to offense you at all. Unfortunately, it looks like it was not well perceived so I will stop replying to this bug. I'm not using Debian on my mips boxes after all... Arnaud -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#519006: breaks dump builds, too
On 08.06.2010 20:02, Bdale Garbee wrote: This prevents dump from building on mips/mipsel, which means the version of dump in testing is now months out of date. Is there an estimate for when this bug will be fixed? this is up to the debian-mips maintainers to answer. is there different behaviour when all objects involved in the link are rebuilt with binutils from experimental? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#519006: breaks dump builds, too
Matthias Klose d...@debian.org writes: Hi, On 08.06.2010 20:02, Bdale Garbee wrote: This prevents dump from building on mips/mipsel, which means the version of dump in testing is now months out of date. Is there an estimate for when this bug will be fixed? this is up to the debian-mips maintainers to answer. is there different behaviour when all objects involved in the link are rebuilt with binutils from experimental? hmm... Why are you talking about binutils ? From what I remember, the patch fixing the issue is in gcc 4.5 and someone said it won't be easy to backport it. Arnaud -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#519006: breaks dump builds, too
On 09.06.2010 12:02, Arnaud Patard (Rtp) wrote: Matthias Klosed...@debian.org writes: Hi, On 08.06.2010 20:02, Bdale Garbee wrote: This prevents dump from building on mips/mipsel, which means the version of dump in testing is now months out of date. Is there an estimate for when this bug will be fixed? this is up to the debian-mips maintainers to answer. is there different behaviour when all objects involved in the link are rebuilt with binutils from experimental? hmm... Why are you talking about binutils ? From what I remember, the patch fixing the issue is in gcc 4.5 reference? and someone said it won't be easy to backport it. so what do you propose? - drop mips as a release architecture? - do you volunteer to make gcc-4.5 ready for inclusion in mips and fix any resulting RC-critical issue? Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#519006: breaks dump builds, too
This prevents dump from building on mips/mipsel, which means the version of dump in testing is now months out of date. Is there an estimate for when this bug will be fixed? Bdale -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
