Bug#533141: closed by Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk (Bug#533141: fixed in netatalk 2.0.4-1)
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 09:37:12AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Did you reset your environment between each step? I.e. remove your unpacked netatalk sources and unpack again from scratch using dpkg-source -x netatalk*.dsc? If not, please try that (as the source becomes infected when the error first occur). Yes, I always unpacked the source a new. What version of Debian are you using which allows you to switch between 1.x and 2.x of libtool? I.e. what is the output of the following commands: lsb_release -a LSB Version: core-2.0-amd64:core-2.0-noarch:core-3.0-amd64:core-3.0-noarch:core-3.1-amd64:core-3.1-noarch:core-3.2-amd64:core-3.2-noarch:cxx-3.0-amd64:cxx-3.0-noarch:cxx-3.1-amd64:cxx-3.1-noarch:cxx-3.2-amd64:cxx-3.2-noarch:desktop-3.1-amd64:desktop-3.1-noarch:desktop-3.2-amd64:desktop-3.2-noarch:graphics-2.0-amd64:graphics-2.0-noarch:graphics-3.0-amd64:graphics-3.0-noarch:graphics-3.1-amd64:graphics-3.1-noarch:graphics-3.2-amd64:graphics-3.2-noarch:qt4-3.1-amd64:qt4-3.1-noarch Distributor ID: Debian Description:Debian GNU/Linux testing (squeeze) Release:testing Codename: squeeze egrep -Hr '^[^#]' /etc/apt/sources.list* I mostly track testing, but I always keep stable, unstable, and experimental available. At the present time, the only thing I have which is neither stable nor testing is the nouveau driver from experimental. I'm mostly up-to-date on squeeze, except I'm still using the lenny KDE pacakges. I also grab the emacs snapshot packages from http://emacs.orebokech.com as well as mplayer, vlc, and related packages from http://www.debian-multimedia.org. -- Itai Itai Seggev, Knox College, Mathematics Department In 1997 a group of programmers started writing a desktop environment to fix a travesty they didn't create. Their program promptly found its way onto un*x systems everywhere. Today, still opposed by a software monopolist, they survive as soldiers of fortune. If you share their vision, if you know you can help, and if you can connect to internet, maybe you can join... the K-Team. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#533141: closed by Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk (Bug#533141: fixed in netatalk 2.0.4-1)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 11:46:58PM -0500, Itai Seggev wrote: At all times I had libltdl7=2.2.6a-4 and libltdl3=1.5.26-4 installed. I started out with the following packages. libtool i=2.2.6a-4 libltdl-dev i=2.2.6a-4 libltl3-dev p This produced the error messages in my bug report, and it still does. (With 2.0.4-1). As someone suggested, I installed libltdl3-dev, giving. libtool i=2.2.6a-4 libltdl-dev p libltl3-dev i=1.5.26-4 This produced the same error messages. At this point I downgraded libtool to match libltdl3-dev, resulting in libtool i=1.5.26-4 libltdl-dev p libltl3-dev i=1.5.26-4 This allowed me to successfully build the package. For completeness, I also tried the following. libtool i=1.5.26-4 libltdl-dev i=2.2.6a-4 libltl3-dev p Unsuprisingly, this died with error messages like those shown below. In all 4 of configurations described above, a ./configure make would succesfully build the package, so I guess something in debian/rules or the patches it applies is wonky. Or there is something wrong with my system. However, I don't really muck with autotools and such. I can write a Makefile, but about the only thing I can do autotools is ./autogen.sh ./configure make make install. :) Anway, thanks for your time! Let me know if there's something further I can do to help. Thanks for the details! Did you reset your environment between each step? I.e. remove your unpacked netatalk sources and unpack again from scratch using dpkg-source -x netatalk*.dsc? If not, please try that (as the source becomes infected when the error first occur). What version of Debian are you using which allows you to switch between 1.x and 2.x of libtool? I.e. what is the output of the following commands: lsb_release -a egrep -Hr '^[^#]' /etc/apt/sources.list* Kind regards, - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEAREDAAYFAko7QCgACgkQn7DbMsAkQLj99QCeJKwmsPVVE1NkDSL7WTipbR/0 FnQAoIXMW+/IckUHEBNyYvJYwF8I0B2T =sOBi -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#533141: closed by Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk (Bug#533141: fixed in netatalk 2.0.4-1)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:26:30PM -0500, Itai Seggev wrote: This issue wasn't quite solved for me, but I'm no longer sure this is a bug in netatalk. After further investigation, I discovered that the bug manifested because of the following two situations a) libltdl-dev provides libltdl3-dev and hence satisfies the build-dep b) even if you install libltdl3-dev, you can still have the shiny libtool 2.2 installed. Either of these conditions results in build failure. I was only able to build the package successfully when I had libltdl3-dev and libtool=1.5.26 installed. Whether this is a bug in netatalk, libtool, or in my layman's understanding of build dependencies, I shall leave to wiser minds than mine. Please elaborate: What system are you using, that provides you the old libtool to install, concurrently with the new libltdl-dev? Yes, libltdl-dev provides libltdl3-dev, but you describred something else: you described how explicitly requesting one of them _uninstalled_ the other to replace it - and that does not sound like a single package providing the other virtually. So please elaborate on the system you are using. Kind regards, - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEAREDAAYFAko59C4ACgkQn7DbMsAkQLgrAQCfflfp245DDp7JGgcu6F69ba7d XDUAn2j129Olgn/1/zxHaMZ44iEzpkpW =6bGd -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#533141: closed by Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk (Bug#533141: fixed in netatalk 2.0.4-1)
At all times I had libltdl7=2.2.6a-4 and libltdl3=1.5.26-4 installed. I
started out with the following packages.
libtool i=2.2.6a-4
libltdl-dev i=2.2.6a-4
libltl3-dev p
This produced the error messages in my bug report, and it still does. (With
2.0.4-1). As someone suggested, I installed libltdl3-dev, giving.
libtool i=2.2.6a-4
libltdl-dev p
libltl3-dev i=1.5.26-4
This produced the same error messages. At this point I downgraded libtool to
match libltdl3-dev, resulting in
libtool i=1.5.26-4
libltdl-dev p
libltl3-dev i=1.5.26-4
This allowed me to successfully build the package. For completeness, I also
tried the following.
libtool i=1.5.26-4
libltdl-dev i=2.2.6a-4
libltl3-dev p
Unsuprisingly, this died with error messages like those shown below.
In all 4 of configurations described above, a ./configure make would
succesfully build the package, so I guess something in debian/rules or the
patches it applies is wonky. Or there is something wrong with my system.
However, I don't really muck with autotools and such. I can write a Makefile,
but about the only thing I can do autotools is ./autogen.sh ./configure
make make install. :)
Anway, thanks for your time! Let me know if there's something further I can do
to help.
error message snippet---
/usr/src/netatalk-2.0.4/./configure: line 23815: _LT_CMD_GLOBAL_SYMBOLS:
command not found
checking for _ prefix in compiled symbols... no
/usr/src/netatalk-2.0.4/./configure: line 23874: syntax error near unexpected
token `newline'
/usr/src/netatalk-2.0.4/./configure: line 23874: `_LT_TRY_DLOPEN_SELF('
make[1]: *** [config.status] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/netatalk-2.0.4'
make: *** [debian/stamp-makefile-build] Error 2
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
debuild: fatal error at line 1324:
dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -D -us -uc failed
error message snippet
--
Itai
Itai Seggev, Knox College, Mathematics Department
In 1997 a group of programmers started writing a desktop environment to fix a
travesty they didn't create. Their program promptly found its way onto un*x
systems everywhere. Today, still opposed by a software monopolist, they survive
as soldiers of fortune. If you share their vision, if you know you can help,
and if you can connect to internet, maybe you can join... the K-Team.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#533141: closed by Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk (Bug#533141: fixed in netatalk 2.0.4-1)
This issue wasn't quite solved for me, but I'm no longer sure this is a bug in netatalk. After further investigation, I discovered that the bug manifested because of the following two situations a) libltdl-dev provides libltdl3-dev and hence satisfies the build-dep b) even if you install libltdl3-dev, you can still have the shiny libtool 2.2 installed. Either of these conditions results in build failure. I was only able to build the package successfully when I had libltdl3-dev and libtool=1.5.26 installed. Whether this is a bug in netatalk, libtool, or in my layman's understanding of build dependencies, I shall leave to wiser minds than mine. --Itai On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:06:10PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report which was filed against the netatalk package: #533141: Current netatalk fails to build from source It has been closed by Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk. Their explanation is attached below along with your original report. If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate message then please contact Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk by replying to this email. -- 533141: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=533141 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems From: Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk To: 533141-cl...@bugs.debian.org Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:03:43 + Subject: Bug#533141: fixed in netatalk 2.0.4-1 Source: netatalk Source-Version: 2.0.4-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of netatalk, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: netatalk_2.0.4-1.diff.gz to pool/main/n/netatalk/netatalk_2.0.4-1.diff.gz netatalk_2.0.4-1.dsc to pool/main/n/netatalk/netatalk_2.0.4-1.dsc netatalk_2.0.4-1_amd64.deb to pool/main/n/netatalk/netatalk_2.0.4-1_amd64.deb netatalk_2.0.4.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/n/netatalk/netatalk_2.0.4.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 533...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk (supplier of updated netatalk package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 23:32:48 +0200 Source: netatalk Binary: netatalk Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2.0.4-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk Changed-By: Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk Description: netatalk - AppleTalk user binaries Closes: 533141 533344 533345 Changes: netatalk (2.0.4-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream release. * Update local CDBS snippets: + Fix package-relations cleanup of debhelper 7 + Implement fail-source-not-repackaged rule in upstream-tarball.mk + Update URL to draft DEP5 format in copyright-check.mk output * Add proper copyright header to debian/rules. * Rewrite copyright to use DEP5 r54 proposed machine-readable format. * Fix and improve db upgrade commands in README.Debian, and adjust NEWS. Closes: bug#533344, thanks to Itai Seggev. * Update dependencies: + Suggest texlive-base-bin (not tetex-bin). Closes: bug#533345, thanks to Itai Seggev + Suggest (not recommend) libpam-cracklib + Build-depend on libcups2-dev (not libcupsys2-dev), thanks to lintian * Fix patches against autogenerated files: + Renumber patches 208, 209 and 211 to have them applied last. + Rewrite and rename patch 109 to unconditionally avoid broken xfs quota, and add new patch 294 doing the same to autogenerated configure script. + Disable patches 107 and 112 to avoid maintaining complex autotools patch for feature we do not currently use anyway (zeroconf). Together, above closes: bug#533141, thanks to Itai Seggev and Frank Lahm. * Drop Uploaders stanza: I am already maintainer (lintian complains), and Sebastian haven't contributed for a couple of years (package is in LowNMU and collab-maint: contributions are still welcome!). Checksums-Sha1: fd560e401a8235f9554f91d21a4b4e1bd87ba09e 1462 netatalk_2.0.4-1.dsc c5c46eca6a17d88c327f4052add20d75aeb174bb 1345860 netatalk_2.0.4.orig.tar.gz 3a1fe567e96f64d362a6eb275d35eb2f1c5036f7 56102 netatalk_2.0.4-1.diff.gz 0a8499b33efb5140cdcf1347b557974a55410200 971812 netatalk_2.0.4-1_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: 17c12e312bca465b040366d689ca0eca25f59a09d6a751018ae8330fe2d04598 1462
