Bug#536905: Drop helium or keep uuagc

[Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva]

Hi Joachim.

Excerpts from Joachim Breitner's message of Seg Set 27 09:05:06 -0300 2010:
(...)
> helium is in testing but not buildable:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=598174
> due to uuagc missing there. Uuagc has an RC bug:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=536905
> 
> Looking at the hackage page, uuagc is actively maintained, but does not
> seem to have any uess in Debian. Drop it (and thus helium?) or keep it?

This bug seems to be already corrected in the newer upstream version, which
builds fine using the current debian/ dir, so I think it will be an easy fix
for us.  I'd say we drop it from squeeze, to avoid the inclusion of a new
upstream version now, and correct it for wheezy.

Greetings.
(...)
-- 
marcot
http://marcot.eti.br/
[Flattr=54498]


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#536905: Drop helium or keep uuagc

[Joachim Breitner]

Hi,

helium is in testing but not buildable:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=598174
due to uuagc missing there. Uuagc has an RC bug:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=536905

Looking at the hackage page, uuagc is actively maintained, but does not
seem to have any uess in Debian. Drop it (and thus helium?) or keep it?

Greetings,
Joachim


-- 
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
  nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
  JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part