Bug#540512: Bug#538822: dash and sh diversions: wouldn't it be nice to fix 538822 and 540512?

2012-10-30 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Paul Gevers (elb...@debian.org):
 Hi all involved,
 
 [This is a ping].
 
 Reading through RC bug 538822 and 540512 (which were already RC during
 Squeeze release in 2010) I have the feeling that it is known how these
 bug could be fixed and changes are available in the git repository.
 Shouldn't we discuss this with the release team and see if we can upload
 the latest changes? I tried to review them, but this is to complicated
 for me.
 
 If we can not get this fixed for Wheezy, do we (again) need
 release-notes to note the fact? Or just use the Pre-Depends as mentioned
 in bug 538822?
 
 Willing to help, if I can.


IMHO (not involved in any of these packages), now is bad time to fix
these bugs: too late in the release process.

What's needed is someone taking care of them as soon as possible after
the release of wheezy. Such important and hairy issues should be dealt
with at the beginning of a release cycle and not when we're polishing
things for a release.

My 2 cents, only.




signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#538822: dash and sh diversions: wouldn't it be nice to fix 538822 and 540512?

2012-10-30 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Christian PERRIER wrote:

 IMHO (not involved in any of these packages), now is bad time to fix
 these bugs: too late in the release process.

Yes, I think we should try to fix the diversion mess in experimental,
ignoring the release cycle, and wait for wheezy+1 or later before
including the changes in sid.

Sorry I dropped the ball on this.  Help testing and tweaking the
patches is always welcome.

On the plus side, this means we have time to make the appropriate
debootstrap improvements to get this working cleanly and well.

Thanks,
Jonathan


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#538822: dash and sh diversions: wouldn't it be nice to fix 538822 and 540512?

2012-10-29 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi all involved,

[This is a ping].

Reading through RC bug 538822 and 540512 (which were already RC during
Squeeze release in 2010) I have the feeling that it is known how these
bug could be fixed and changes are available in the git repository.
Shouldn't we discuss this with the release team and see if we can upload
the latest changes? I tried to review them, but this is to complicated
for me.

If we can not get this fixed for Wheezy, do we (again) need
release-notes to note the fact? Or just use the Pre-Depends as mentioned
in bug 538822?

Willing to help, if I can.
Paul



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature