Bug#540332: ITP: at-spi2-core -- Assistive Technology Service Provider Interface (Core) - dbus

2010-03-30 Thread Sebastian Dröge
On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 11:02 +0200, Mario Lang wrote:

  They're part of GNOME 2.30, which is a goal for squeeze,
 
 part of in the sense that they are installed in paralell with at-spi,
 or does this mean GNOME 2.30 wants to ship at-spi2 as the
 default accessibility backend?
 You have to understand that the switch from at-spi to at-spi2 is
 very very substantial and likely will break a few things.

They're part of GNOME 2.30 as optional alternative to at-spi(1).
at-spi(1) is still in the platform and at-spi2 is part of the desktop
suite.

It would be great to have both available in squeeze as alternatives
IMHO.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#540332: ITP: at-spi2-core -- Assistive Technology Service Provider Interface (Core) - dbus

2010-03-30 Thread Mario Lang
Sebastian Dröge sl...@circular-chaos.org writes:

 what's the plan with at-spi2-core/-atk? Will they be uploaded to
 experimental soonish (to get them out of NEW) and then to unstable?

I am really not sure right now.

 They're part of GNOME 2.30, which is a goal for squeeze,

part of in the sense that they are installed in paralell with at-spi,
or does this mean GNOME 2.30 wants to ship at-spi2 as the
default accessibility backend?
You have to understand that the switch from at-spi to at-spi2 is
very very substantial and likely will break a few things.

Additionally, upstream of a lot of GNOME accessibility stuff
has just been fired by Oracle, so this switch comes at
the worst time possible, with very little upstream support.

I am not so happy with changing the accessibility backend
beneath our asses a few days before releasing squeeze.

Personally, I'd like to see squeeze released with at-spi(1)
to ensure a decent user experience, and switch to at-spi2
in squeeze+1 development.

However, if anyone can demonstrate at-spi2 stability, I guess
a switch is fine as well.  But this needs to be tested a lot, by
people that *use* the infrastructure so that we can be sure we havent
missed anything.

-- 
CYa,
  ⡍⠁⠗⠊⠕ | Debian Developer URL:http://debian.org/
  .''`. | Get my public key via finger mlang/k...@db.debian.org
 : :' : | 1024D/7FC1A0854909BCCDBE6C102DDFFC022A6B113E44
 `. `'
   `-  URL:http://delysid.org/  URL:http://www.staff.tugraz.at/mlang/



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#540332: ITP: at-spi2-core -- Assistive Technology Service Provider Interface (Core) - dbus

2010-03-29 Thread Sebastian Dröge
Hi,
what's the plan with at-spi2-core/-atk? Will they be uploaded to
experimental soonish (to get them out of NEW) and then to unstable?
They're part of GNOME 2.30, which is a goal for squeeze, and as such
should go into unstable as soon as a stable release exists.

Thanks for working on these packages :)


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#540332: ITP: at-spi2-core -- Assistive Technology Service Provider Interface (Core) - dbus

2010-03-29 Thread Ray Wang
Hi,

These packages were taken care of by Mario,
but I haven't heard any news from them yet,

Mario, could you give some updates from you?
if nobody is taking charge of them, I'm happy to help :)


2010/3/29 Sebastian Dröge sl...@circular-chaos.org:
 Hi,
 what's the plan with at-spi2-core/-atk? Will they be uploaded to
 experimental soonish (to get them out of NEW) and then to unstable?
 They're part of GNOME 2.30, which is a goal for squeeze, and as such
 should go into unstable as soon as a stable release exists.

 Thanks for working on these packages :)




-- 
Ray Wang
 - Free As In Freedom



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#540332: ITP: at-spi2-core -- Assistive Technology Service Provider Interface (Core) - dbus

2009-08-08 Thread Ray Wang
Oh yes, you're right,  I didn't notice there were already preliminary
packages for new at-spi, since they are just released recently.
I'm terribly sorry to duplicate your jobs. I think I should close this
bug, but how? :)

Sorry again, please ignore my reports.  :)

On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Cyril Bruleboisk...@debian.org wrote:
 Ray Wang rayw...@gnome.org (07/08/2009):
 Package: wnpp
 Severity: wishlist
 Owner: Ray Wang rayw...@gnome.org


 * Package name    : at-spi2-core
   Version         : 0.1.0
   Upstream Author : Mike Gorse mgo...@novell.com
                     Mark Doffman mark.doff...@codethink.co.uk
 * URL             : https://projects.codethink.co.uk/index.php/p/at-spi2
 * License         : LGPL
   Programming Lang: C
   Description     : Assistive Technology Service Provider Interface (Core) - 
 dbus

 This library, based on ATK, is a general interface for applications to
 make use of the accessibility toolkit.  This version is based on dbus.

 Hi,

 it was mentioned by Mario in [1]. I guess it'd be nice for you to
 coordinate with “us” (-accessibility) for the packaging of at-*
 packages, Mario already has spent some time diving into this set of
 packages.

  1. 871vnukw3s@x2.delysid.org

 Thanks for considering.

 (No need to Cc me if you keep -devel or -accessibility in the loop.)

 Mraw,
 KiBi.

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

 iEYEARECAAYFAkp8BAUACgkQeGfVPHR5Nd2kYACgjGt07A8Ur+celdlyiJ7aJXBb
 CXYAnji7tzwVYLiXlpqHYUpQfNVlOK/s
 =nJb9
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-





-- 
Ray Wang
 - Free As In Freedom



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#540332: ITP: at-spi2-core -- Assistive Technology Service Provider Interface (Core) - dbus

2009-08-07 Thread Ray Wang
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ray Wang rayw...@gnome.org


* Package name: at-spi2-core
  Version : 0.1.0
  Upstream Author : Mike Gorse mgo...@novell.com
Mark Doffman mark.doff...@codethink.co.uk
* URL : https://projects.codethink.co.uk/index.php/p/at-spi2
* License : LGPL
  Programming Lang: C
  Description : Assistive Technology Service Provider Interface (Core) - 
dbus

This library, based on ATK, is a general interface for applications to
make use of the accessibility toolkit.  This version is based on dbus.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
  APT prefers lenny
  APT policy: (500, 'lenny')
Architecture: i386 (i686)



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#540332: ITP: at-spi2-core -- Assistive Technology Service Provider Interface (Core) - dbus

2009-08-07 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Ray Wang rayw...@gnome.org (07/08/2009):
 Package: wnpp
 Severity: wishlist
 Owner: Ray Wang rayw...@gnome.org
 
 
 * Package name: at-spi2-core
   Version : 0.1.0
   Upstream Author : Mike Gorse mgo...@novell.com
 Mark Doffman mark.doff...@codethink.co.uk
 * URL : https://projects.codethink.co.uk/index.php/p/at-spi2
 * License : LGPL
   Programming Lang: C
   Description : Assistive Technology Service Provider Interface (Core) - 
 dbus
 
 This library, based on ATK, is a general interface for applications to
 make use of the accessibility toolkit.  This version is based on dbus.

Hi,

it was mentioned by Mario in [1]. I guess it'd be nice for you to
coordinate with “us” (-accessibility) for the packaging of at-*
packages, Mario already has spent some time diving into this set of
packages.

 1. 871vnukw3s@x2.delysid.org

Thanks for considering.

(No need to Cc me if you keep -devel or -accessibility in the loop.)

Mraw,
KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature