Bug#549003: [Pkg-libvirt-maintainers] Bug#549003: destroy/save has collateral damage
On Sun, 04 Oct 2009, Guido Günther wrote: > On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 11:04:04PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote: > > On Thu, 01 Oct 2009, Guido Günther wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 12:19:37PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote: > > > > On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Guido Günther wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 11:09:57AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote: > > > > > > Package: libvirt-bin > > > > > > Version: 0.6.3-4~bpo50+1 > > > > > > > > > > Every now and then, but not always, virsh destroy $domain, or as I > > > > > > just > > > > > > found out virsh save $domain, not only kills the requested domain, > > > > > > but > > > > > > also a second, unrelated domain. > > > > > This has been fixed upstream already. I think it should be fixed in > > > > > 0.6.5 (squeeze) but it sure is in 0.7.1 (sid). > > > > > > > > > > I'll look into updating the packages on bpo but am a bit short on time > > > > > at the moment. > > > > > > > > Mind if I upload a simple recompile of 0.6.5? (The only thing that > > > > appears to need fixing is the build-dependencies line which is a bit > > > > overzealous.) > > > ...but needed dut to dpkg-dev breackage. I already built a backport > > > yesterday: > > > http://honk.sigxcpu.org/projects/libvirt/snapshots/ > > > Would you mind testing that one? > > > > Hmm. there is no .dsc, but my own backport build for amd64 worked, so > > it's probably fine. > ...and you don't see the colateral damage anymore? Hard to tell. As I said, it doesn't happen every time. -- | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating System | `-http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#549003: [Pkg-libvirt-maintainers] Bug#549003: destroy/save has collateral damage
On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 11:04:04PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote: > On Thu, 01 Oct 2009, Guido Günther wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 12:19:37PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote: > > > On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Guido Günther wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 11:09:57AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote: > > > > > Package: libvirt-bin > > > > > Version: 0.6.3-4~bpo50+1 > > > > > > > > Every now and then, but not always, virsh destroy $domain, or as I > > > > > just > > > > > found out virsh save $domain, not only kills the requested domain, but > > > > > also a second, unrelated domain. > > > > This has been fixed upstream already. I think it should be fixed in > > > > 0.6.5 (squeeze) but it sure is in 0.7.1 (sid). > > > > > > > > I'll look into updating the packages on bpo but am a bit short on time > > > > at the moment. > > > > > > Mind if I upload a simple recompile of 0.6.5? (The only thing that > > > appears to need fixing is the build-dependencies line which is a bit > > > overzealous.) > > ...but needed dut to dpkg-dev breackage. I already built a backport > > yesterday: > > http://honk.sigxcpu.org/projects/libvirt/snapshots/ > > Would you mind testing that one? > > Hmm. there is no .dsc, but my own backport build for amd64 worked, so > it's probably fine. ...and you don't see the colateral damage anymore? -- Guido -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#549003: [Pkg-libvirt-maintainers] Bug#549003: destroy/save has collateral damage
On Thu, 01 Oct 2009, Guido Günther wrote: > On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 12:19:37PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote: > > On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Guido Günther wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 11:09:57AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote: > > > > Package: libvirt-bin > > > > Version: 0.6.3-4~bpo50+1 > > > > > > Every now and then, but not always, virsh destroy $domain, or as I just > > > > found out virsh save $domain, not only kills the requested domain, but > > > > also a second, unrelated domain. > > > This has been fixed upstream already. I think it should be fixed in > > > 0.6.5 (squeeze) but it sure is in 0.7.1 (sid). > > > > > > I'll look into updating the packages on bpo but am a bit short on time > > > at the moment. > > > > Mind if I upload a simple recompile of 0.6.5? (The only thing that > > appears to need fixing is the build-dependencies line which is a bit > > overzealous.) > ...but needed dut to dpkg-dev breackage. I already built a backport > yesterday: > http://honk.sigxcpu.org/projects/libvirt/snapshots/ > Would you mind testing that one? Hmm. there is no .dsc, but my own backport build for amd64 worked, so it's probably fine. -- | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating System | `-http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#549003: [Pkg-libvirt-maintainers] Bug#549003: destroy/save has collateral damage
On Thu, 01 Oct 2009, Guido Günther wrote: > On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 12:19:37PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote: > > On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Guido Günther wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 11:09:57AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote: > > > > Package: libvirt-bin > > > > Version: 0.6.3-4~bpo50+1 > > > > > > Every now and then, but not always, virsh destroy $domain, or as I just > > > > found out virsh save $domain, not only kills the requested domain, but > > > > also a second, unrelated domain. > > > This has been fixed upstream already. I think it should be fixed in > > > 0.6.5 (squeeze) but it sure is in 0.7.1 (sid). > > > > > > I'll look into updating the packages on bpo but am a bit short on time > > > at the moment. > > > > Mind if I upload a simple recompile of 0.6.5? (The only thing that > > appears to need fixing is the build-dependencies line which is a bit > > overzealous.) > ...but needed dut to dpkg-dev breackage. I already built a backport I changed it to Build-dep: dpkg-dev >> x | dpkg-dev << x. > yesterday: > http://honk.sigxcpu.org/projects/libvirt/snapshots/ > Would you mind testing that one? I'll try later today. -- | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating System | `-http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#549003: [Pkg-libvirt-maintainers] Bug#549003: destroy/save has collateral damage
On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 12:19:37PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote: > On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Guido Günther wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 11:09:57AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote: > > > Package: libvirt-bin > > > Version: 0.6.3-4~bpo50+1 > > > > Every now and then, but not always, virsh destroy $domain, or as I just > > > found out virsh save $domain, not only kills the requested domain, but > > > also a second, unrelated domain. > > This has been fixed upstream already. I think it should be fixed in > > 0.6.5 (squeeze) but it sure is in 0.7.1 (sid). > > > > I'll look into updating the packages on bpo but am a bit short on time > > at the moment. > > Mind if I upload a simple recompile of 0.6.5? (The only thing that > appears to need fixing is the build-dependencies line which is a bit > overzealous.) ...but needed dut to dpkg-dev breackage. I already built a backport yesterday: http://honk.sigxcpu.org/projects/libvirt/snapshots/ Would you mind testing that one? Cheers, -- Guido -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#549003: [Pkg-libvirt-maintainers] Bug#549003: destroy/save has collateral damage
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Guido Günther wrote: > On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 11:09:57AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote: > > Package: libvirt-bin > > Version: 0.6.3-4~bpo50+1 > > Every now and then, but not always, virsh destroy $domain, or as I just > > found out virsh save $domain, not only kills the requested domain, but > > also a second, unrelated domain. > This has been fixed upstream already. I think it should be fixed in > 0.6.5 (squeeze) but it sure is in 0.7.1 (sid). > > I'll look into updating the packages on bpo but am a bit short on time > at the moment. Mind if I upload a simple recompile of 0.6.5? (The only thing that appears to need fixing is the build-dependencies line which is a bit overzealous.) -- | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating System | `-http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#549003: [Pkg-libvirt-maintainers] Bug#549003: destroy/save has collateral damage
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 11:09:57AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote: > Package: libvirt-bin > Version: 0.6.3-4~bpo50+1 > > Hi, > > I'm using virsh with kvm (85+dfsg-4~bpo50+1) on 2.6.30.8. > > Every now and then, but not always, virsh destroy $domain, or as I just > found out virsh save $domain, not only kills the requested domain, but > also a second, unrelated domain. This has been fixed upstream already. I think it should be fixed in 0.6.5 (squeeze) but it sure is in 0.7.1 (sid). I'll look into updating the packages on bpo but am a bit short on time at the moment. Cheers, -- Guido -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#549003: destroy/save has collateral damage
Package: libvirt-bin Version: 0.6.3-4~bpo50+1 Hi, I'm using virsh with kvm (85+dfsg-4~bpo50+1) on 2.6.30.8. Every now and then, but not always, virsh destroy $domain, or as I just found out virsh save $domain, not only kills the requested domain, but also a second, unrelated domain. Cheers, Peter -- | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating System | `-http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
