Bug#551689: [Pkg-scicomp-devel] Bug#551689: libatlas3gf-{base, core2sse3, corei7sse3} depend on libatlas3gf-amd64sse3, not libatlas3gf-base on amd64
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>> Looks as if libatlas3gf-amd64sse3 is the base package.
>> The desired dependencies will be
>> libatlas3gf-*sse3 -> libatlas3gf-base.
> Well, here, no. libatlas3gf-*sse3 is an optimized replacement of
> libatlas3gf-base.
Then the weird thing happens in i386, too.
On i386, I found that libatlas3gf-{sse,sse2,sse3,core2sse3} depend on
libatlas3gf-base.
--
Ryo IGARASHI, Ph.D.
rigar...@gmail.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#551689: [Pkg-scicomp-devel] Bug#551689: libatlas3gf-{base, core2sse3, corei7sse3} depend on libatlas3gf-amd64sse3, not libatlas3gf-base on amd64
Thanks for testing Ryo.
> This time all the packages can be installed properly, but I found weird
> dependencies
> upon binary packages:
>
> $ dpkg --info libatlas3gf-corei7sse3_3.8.3-6_amd64.deb
> ...snip...
> Depends: libatlas3gf-amd64sse3, libc6 (>= 2.3.2)
It is pretty weird. Does anyone on pkg-scicomp have an idea here ?
Could it be introduced by ${shlibs:Depends} ?
> Looks as if libatlas3gf-amd64sse3 is the base package.
> The desired dependencies will be
> libatlas3gf-*sse3 -> libatlas3gf-base.
Well, here, no. libatlas3gf-*sse3 is an optimized replacement of
libatlas3gf-base.
Sylvestre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
